Pages

Showing posts with label Hickson v Acme Justice Corp.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hickson v Acme Justice Corp.. Show all posts

Monday, May 7, 2012

Appreciating Those Viewing the First 100


I just wanted to take the time to say thank you to each and every viewer of The Casino Gaming Oracle.  This post marks a milestone, it is the 100th post of this blog site.

My much appreciated loyal viewers know that I strive to thank each of you for viewing this blog.  From day one this blog has been my vehicle to make the corruption and injustice exacted in Southern New Jersey known.
 Trust me, it is not easy getting the word out on injustice these days, especially on this venue.  With all the competition for you viewership, I'm thankful to have made it this far.  Just look at the name of the blog.  Who would expect to read about legal matters, or injustice from a site named the casino gaming oracle?

According to all the so called laws of blogging this blog should not be relevant, but your continued support tells a story to the contrary.  With this 100th post and over 7200 page views the word is spreading.  Yeah, the law does not appeal to many.  I mean with all of the Stumbling, Pinning, and Insta-this, and Digging-that going on it's a wonder I get 10 views per post.
 But, as the numbers are showing, there are some of you that care about this subject matter.  To all the lawyers and other judicial officers that support me, thank you, because I know and understand the particular circumstances that you face in expressing any agreement you may have with the concepts and truth's I'm setting forth.  Yet I must say that if I were a lawyer I would do all to protect my profession and acknowledge the truth when I see it.

 To date the most popular post are:

  • Hickson v Acme Justice Corporation- this is overall introductory post as to what this civil action is all about.  A great place to get up to speed in the corruption and the acronym (JSHIT) is also introduced. For those that didn't get it, I titled this post because our judge in this matter is just like the coyote, all his "Acme (JSHIT)" fails.
  • Absolute Immunity Via Recusal- In this post I introduce you to the motion for recusal by which the judges could have saved their absolute immunity, but now that as of 5/7/2012 said ruling on the motion is 76 days past due the 2/21/2012 hearing date, it would appear that we have proof of further violation of my Constitutional Rights.
  • All-In-All It's Just More JSHIT on the Wall- In this post I asked the question: You be the judge, has the court been given notice that the plaintiff's are seeking the recusal of these judges from civil actions 11-cv-06304 and 08-cv-02407? After linking to my proofs this posts blasted it's way to the 3rd most popular post, while being one of the youngest post on the list.
  • Proselytization of KMW- If there was on post that I would hope the world could see it would be this one, why? First of all you have a new African-American, female judge yielding to the "Good ole Boy's Network." Enough said, why, because as a judge gender, and race should not come into play, but then to fold under pressure is unforgivable. Then this judge had the nerve to go out and give a seminar on Human Rights to a sorority of African-American women that should be able to look up to her.
 Please continue to tune in as these civil actions are still on-going and the resolution is not around the corner.  I do have actions to take and I will see justice done. I will further need all the help I can get from you, my viewers.  Please continue to tell a friend or two and lawyers, if you must, have a friend comment for you but do comment, and if you are not a lawyer and just have a question, please ask it and I will do my best to answer it for you.

Thank You one and all,
Gaming Oracle!

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Judge Lies to Cover Lies, (JSHIT #8)


Please don't pre-judge me to be disrespectful when I say that a judge lies to cover lies, but I have to call it as I see it.  Pro se litigants face enough prejudice in courts due to their pro se "status," so please allow me to continue giving you the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and then you can judge for yourselves.

Previously within "JSHIT #8, Have Judge That Will Lie!" I gave you the facts and showed you the documents relating to the filing of the "Third Amended Complaint" in civil action 08cv02407.  You were also given the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure that stated when and how a paper is filed with the court.  So, based on the facts and the law, was the "Third Amended Complaint" filed on 8/18/2009?

Yes, as you saw when you clicked the link this document was stamped filed by the clerk of the court on 8/18/2009 as document [32], which is further reflected by the courts docket sheet showing the same.  But now we must remember that we have a judge that knows he cannot make a ruling on a document that is supported by documentary proofs attached as exhibits, so a plan had to be devised to correct his understudy's mistake in following the rules correctly.
Again, knowing that the complaint was supported by strong proofs, Judge Noel L. Hillman and his band of cohorts took from 8/18/2009 through 11/02/2009 to devise their plan.  After coming up with this plan Judge Karen Williams was called upon to issue an Order stating that I had 20 days to re-file a document that was already filed on 8/18/2009.  [See Order granting32 Motion on the docket sheet by scrolling to page 11.]

Since I smell some "JSHIT," let's see what the law has to say on the matter, because it's obvious that we have to take it further than FRCVP 5, when dealing with this band of wrongdoers.  Dean v. Veterans Admin. Regional Office, 943F. 2d 667, 671 says:

See also Rodgers v. Bowen, 790 F.2d 1550, 1552 (11th Cir.1986) ("[A] complaint is `filed' for statute of limitations purposes when it is `in the actual or constructive possession of the clerk,' regardless of the untimely payment of the required filing fee.") (citations omitted); Robinson v. City of Fairfield, 750 F.2d 1507, 1511 (11th Cir.1985) (the filing of legal and factual nature of claim along with application for appointment of counsel and for authority to commence action without prepayment of costs constitutes the filing of a complaint).
 These judicial officers must be "smoking the good shit," they have to be high on something if the docket shows the complaint in the possession of the clerk, the document itself clearly says as seen on the Notice of Motion: "Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 32 Filed 08/18/09 page 1 of 7 Page ID: 519."  Go ahead check it, I'll wait...one thousand one...one thousand two…

Okay, you're back.  Please excuse me but after seeing that you'll understand why I am upset.  How can lying ass Judge Noel L. Hillman have the hubris to write sentence number four, stating:

Sentence #4- That same month, he filed his Motion for Summary Judgment.

America, lets him write this "JSHIT" other lawyers and judges accept this "JSHIT," and start citing the "JSHIT," and the next thing you know we have bad judge made law.  As a pro se litigant I am held to the same rules of court and rules of professional conduct.  Let me boldly state that I hereby proclaim "NOT ON MY [FN] WATCH!"
 Of course he has to state sentence four as he does, this liar knew they were going to put on their "Broadway level" performance of Dec. 14, 2009, wherein "Ms. Proselytization" would attempt to indoctrinate me into this school of thought. NOT!  Later on I will show you how DAG for the State of New Jersey, Kathleen Bartus did submit the documents they would use to over expose and remove 8 pages from my complaint.  Folks federal statutory law calls that tampering with, destruction, and mutilation of documents filed within a Court of the United States of America.

Any wonder why as you read this on 3/8/2012, lying ass Hillman's ruling on the motion to recuse himself from civil action 08-cv-02407 and 11-cv-06304 is 16 days past due from the 2/21/2012 hearing date. The "JSHIT" stinks something awful, and someone needs to get off the "judicial pot."

See, on Dec. 14, 2009, before court commenced I filed the Motion for Summary Judgment at 10:41 AM.  You can see at the link that the clerk of the court stamped it "Received 10:41 AM," and then it was stamped within the system: "Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 39 Filed 12/14/09."  Bad news is, further research has shown me that this practice of "twice filing" might just be worthy of another form of "JSHIT."  You check it out, go to google scholar, in the search box, type "filed twice," and watch the page results fill to the max, Hmm???
 I'll close here, but thanks for coming back each day.  Oh before I forget, I got to thinking, what about all those with everyday questions on the law?  Well I've created a page on Facebook that all can join to ask, discuss, and share their experiences with the law.  You can make posts and all sort's of things, many will probably know how to use this page better than I do, but my pledge will be to get the best answers and keep the conversations going. I will just ask that it stays law related, so please tell as many friends as you can and lets all be friends at 1lol-LaymenOnLaw at http://www.facebook.com/1lolLaymenOnLaw.  I figured others might enjoy saying "this one layman on the law says, or has found."  Again, this community page is open to all laypersons, lawyers, and all in between. See you there!

Thank You,
The Casino Gaming Oracle!

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Bent Minds Fixation on Corruption


By now several people have seen and clicked the "Tweets" of The Casino Gaming Oracle, others have seen the same and wondered, why is this guy attacking our honorable courts and judges?  They (these so-called-honorable) judges are only human folks and fall prey to greed and corruption as well.  Here are a few supporting facts.

On Monday, Feb. 13, 2012, www.lawlessamerica.com posted an article titled "Texas Federal Judge W. Royal Furgeson, Jr. charged with Corruption in Looting Over $4 Million." Let me be honest with you, as most of those that have followed this blog know, I am sharing the same type of information, and one would think that I would welcome the news that there are other corrupt judges out there.
 Read that again folks, "Welcome the news that there are other corrupt judges out there."  In any society that should not be welcomed news. What saddened me most was the appearance of the same "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics" (JSHIT), that I am trying to make known.  This is evident when the above article reports that: "The judges did this, as explained further in this letter, through numerous ex parte meetings, ignoring the law, fabricating events, concealing evidence from the public, ignoring due process, predetermining outcomes, and perjuring statements."

The above points out the major frustration of those like myself and the reporter above, because (JSHIT) is designed to be undetectable to the untrained, and think about it, as you read the above, I'll bet the first thing you said to yourself was: "what proofs does this guy have of ex parte meetings."  That's where you have to slow down and read the facts, because these judges have become so bold that they tell on themselves.

If you were able to ask anyone that knows me, they would tell you that I am always using myself as an example, hence from my own case and previous post, here is support of:

 Now you are armed with the facts,  you should begin to see that I am not the only one to say that your Federal Court Judges should be given a second look as they are going rogue.  You now have others that are publishing their beliefs that they, or those they know of, are being subjected to denial of their Civil and Constitutional Rights. 

Another article was posted titled: "Federal Judge Clarence Coopercharged with Corruption in the case of Scott Hintz -- Scott sent to Prison," but what should be most troubling to you is that now, as I have been doing, these postings are being supported by documentary proofs.  These same proofs are being ignored by those sworn to report such treason.  Folks, plain and simple, that's the good ole boy's and girl's at their self-protecting best. The question is will you stand for  it or continue to ignore it as long as you're not affected personally?
 Please this is a matter of "Public Concern" and you have to act, first by voicing your comments below.  This does not require you to identify yourself, but it shows that a concerned, breathing, and moral person has read the information and was moved to comment.

Don't forget there are only 6 days remaining until Judge Noel L. Hillman will show his conformity to the subject matter of this post. I thank you for following the "Count Down," and pray that you continue to tell a friend or two.

The Casino Gaming Oracle!

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Before Me, I Am Not The First.


Injustice Has been Uncovered as the Past Reveals.
Earl Hickson and Markland Grant must cover every basis and reveal every truth, so that the public may come to know the full facts supporting civil action 1:11-cv-06304.  The Judges, Lawyer's, Deputy Attorney General's, Clerk's of the Court, Harrah's Hotel and Casino, and Caesars Hotel Casino Atlantic City, have conspired and utilize the judges positions to conceal the truth from you, members of the public.  But here be it known, as two tell the truth.

Within her article of Nov.15, 2011, Nic Corbett/The Star-Ledger, headlined, "Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito to Rutgers law Students:'Judging is a Craft.'  The article opens by stating: "In the debate over "activist judges," the contending sides have great difficulty in articulating how exactly they want judges to act, according to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr."
 Through literature and films we learn and accept that witches often must turn to their "book of spells."  Judges have similar books at their disposal, and those we are concerned with here are the "Rules of Court."  When a judge fails to follow the rules of court we are deprived of justice, and the justice made to appear is his own personal justice, or incantation. 

Earl Hickson and Markland Grant are not the first to seek that a casino be held liable under section 1983.   In 2005 the Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit upheld the lower courts decision in Romanski v Detroit Entertainment, 428 F. 3d 629.  An attorney, Phillip Thomas posted an article headed, "Harrah's Sanctioned for Cheating in Casino Litigation." Mr. Thomas highlighted statements from the judges order in the case wherein the judge said: "This court is not naive. It is aware that litigants are frequently successful in concealing information from courts, largely because the power to conceal one’s own documents is far greater than a court’s power to uncover them. It seems very likely that, for every case in which conduct of this nature is uncovered, there are dozens in which the deception is successful. It is simply too expensive in judicial resources for courts with heavy dockets to uncover this sort of misconduct."

Judge Higginbotham, Jr., dissenting in Prinz v Greate Bay, 705 F.2d 692, 702 holds: "Prinz suffered the indignity of being in police custody for 20 hours for an act which was not  a crime.  The majority compounds the injustice of an arrest for an act which was not a crime by allowing the casino to rely on a collateral estoppel defense which was neither pleaded nor proven as required by the rules and precedents.  Unfortunately, once again the odds come out in favor of the casino and against the casino customers.  By considering an issue not articulated in the pleadings, trial, or post trial motions we are expecting of trial judges an omniscience which mortals do not have." [Note the link above is to copy I was able to get in 2010, please compare this to the copy that appears on Google Scholar wherein this dissent is missing, Hmm?]
 I have followed the example of Frederick Douglass, who wrote his narrative and set forth the facts of his life and his struggle.  Within the "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, by Frederick Douglass," the preface by WM. Lloyd Garrison, Boston, May 1, 1845, at page 12 holds: "Such will try to discredit the shocking tales of slaveholding cruelty which are recorded in this truthful Narrative: but they will labor in vain.  Mr. Douglass has frankly disclosed the place of his birth, the names of those who claimed ownership in his body and soul, and the names also of those who committed the crimes which he has alleged against them.  His statements therefore, may easily be disproved, if they are untrue."

I do the same, I will make my allegations, I will show you my proofs, and I will name those that have committed crimes, for if what I say is not true they may easily disprove them instead of concealing the truth via the appearance of justice. Hence I ask you to be the judge of the judges and exercise the craft of the reasonable person armed with all the facts of the circumstance.

Thank you, The Casino Gaming Oracle!

Black History Month 2012 reigns in and all still do not have equal protection of the laws and meaningful access to the Courts of these United States of America.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Spam? NOT! My Cause is!


Spamming AC Beaches this is!

To all the "Star Wars" fans and others that are not, I posit that you may search the heavens and all of the websites with "Yoda Quotes," yet you will not find "Spam? Not! My Cause is!"  This is a "Casino Gaming Oracle" original.

Back in the day "Spam" came with a key. Ask any ole head and they will tell you the frustrations of getting that key to circumvent that odd-shaped-can.  Today you just pop the top and shake that puppy out so to speak. [See Spam.com] Today and on this venue we use the word in a different context, and spam is something we don't want to much of.  How much of your civil and constitutional rights do you want?
One can not spam a cause.  Wait! Before the hater's fly up in arms, hear this.  George Bush said Sadaam had weapons of mass destruction, told the nation.  Was that spam?  Turned out to be bull-you-know what, but was it spam, I ask? [See Bush knew Saddam had no weapons ofmass destruction]
 The Civil Rights Movement called for the equal treatment of all U.S. citizens, yes the momentum was carried by the African-American citizens of the United States, but there were other ethnic groups involved in this calling.  That's it, you see it?  A calling. Both of the given examples were callings, callings that were of public interest.

Even today there is division on this issue of the above movement. The Gov. of the State of New Jersey has posited that there was no need for this movement to take to the streets and the same could have been accomplished by referendum. In response "Black leaders" voiced their displeasure and the article "Black Leaders Blast NJ Governor's Slap at Civil Rights" reports the same. Is this spam I ask?

Yes there will still be some nay-Sayers  that will disagree, but I further posit that like "beauty," a cause is in the eye of the beholder, and or it falls on the ear of the listener.  Whether said listener agrees with what he or she hears is their decision, but the information still forms a cause for those that support the idea.  Hence those that supported former President Bush signed on to go get Sadaam.  Those that supported the Civil Rights Movement marched. Those that disagreed with NJ Gov. Christie, stood up.
I am releasing the facts of a machination exacted by the Southern New Jersey Casino industry, where by they use the Municipal Court of Atlantic City New Jersey to effect unlawful eviction of patrons, in violation of said patron's civil and constitutional rights.  Said machination has progressed to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, wherein judges loyal to the Atlantic City Casinos' attempt to grant said corporations an undue advantage in violation of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey.  [See Hickson v Acme Justice Corporation]

I am asking the you, the public at large view my allegations and supporting evidence, and make your own conclusion.  The acts I reveal are comparable to "Weapons of Mass Destruction" for they destroy the fabric of our judicial system, and consume our trust in the integrity of the courts, in a "mushroom cloud" of doubt and disbelief that judicial officers are committing such acts.
When you see a reference to "thecasinogamingoracle," or a friend asks, "have you heard about (JSHIT)," or you see one of the two on "Twitter," you will have the choice to make, "will I stand and march to eradicate this blight upon my judicial system, or ignore it for the effect is not direct as of this day."  I posit the day will come when the effect is direct.  Your heart-of-heart's will tell you the same, even now you may be saying "Spam Not This Cause Is."

Thank You, one and all, please tell a friend or two!
The Casino Gaming Oracle!

Black History Month 2012 reigns in and all still do not have equal protection of the laws and meaningful access to the Courts of these United States of America.