Got Proof's--Need Judges!

Just-Us (Noel L. Hillman's Little Rascals) vs. Justice (E. Hickson & M. Grant)

The allegation, as held on page 10 of the complaint avers: "Once all the afore mentioned, hired lawyers acting on behalf of, and for the benefit of Harrah's and Caesars, they concertedly would utilize the willful ignorance of judges Noel L. Hillman and Robert B. Kugler," are not bare but supported by documentary proofs that the "Just-Us" Klan don't want you, John and Jane Q Public to see.  Far be it from a new "Two live Crew of Two", the "Justice Crew (Hickson & Grant)" not to make injustice know.  You be the Judge!

This band of cohorts do not know the meaning of ethics, and they lay J.S.H.I.T. (Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics) upon their oaths to uphold the Constitutions of the United States of America and the State of New Jersey.  But now they have given me the proofs I need to come to you for "Supreme Tweet Justice", please follow along.  In my first complaint I filed an action for the violation of my civil and constitutional rights. Injustice lead to the filing of a second action for "Fraud Upon the Court" and "Denial of Access to the Court."  Now I can lay it before you.

How we do!  Over the course of this blog I've preached "Basis in fact and law." Hence the facts that you will need to form your own opinions are:

• The 2nd Complaint- "See Source Link" to the right "A_EDH_MKG_Orig_Complaint_2011_Redac.

• Exhibits Attached to Complaint- I would like to share these documents with all, but there are 174 pages of proofs, some of which cannot be redacted so I must limit access to those requesting a link by emailing such a request to TheCasinoGamingOracle@gmail.com "Request for link to Exhibits."
• Hillman Opinion 11/30/2011- "See Source Link" to the right "Hillman Opinion_11_30_11.

You know "How we do 2", those familiar with this blog site have come to know that I provide you with my basis in law as well.  I cite the Constitutions, Statutes, Regulations and all decisional case law upon which I feel supports my averments.  Not a law, but the American Bar Association said the following, which I will use as a spring-board to this issue, and they said:

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, JUSTICE IN JEOPARDY: REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON THE 21ST CENTURY JUDICIARY 10 (2003) (JUSTICE IN JEOPARDY).

And so, when it comes to the judiciary, the American Bar Association’s Model Code of

Judicial Conduct (some variation of which has been adopted by virtually every state

judicial system and the federal courts) declares that judges “shall avoid impropriety and

the appearance of impropriety in all the judges activities,” and adds that judges “shall act

at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and

independence of the judiciary.”

I feel ashamed that I'll be closing here, but I'm going to try and follow the rules of effective blogging, by limiting the length of my postings.  Please, sign up if you can, especially those in the legal field.  Yes I know pro se litigants and members of the bar got "BEEF" but judge my content. Also have the moxie to stand for what you believe don't hide in fear of the talk around the water cooler or the rumors that will float around chambers and the back hall of justice. If you need motivation read the article "Youngpeople on trial need people who care." Hey! If you need a further break, pass some time like I do at Acronymically Speaking 101 @ as101byogg.blogspot.com.

 Thank you, TheCasinoGamingOracle

Black History Month 2012 reigns in and all still do not have equal protection of the laws and meaningful access to the Courts of these United States of America.