This is Some (JSHIT), True or False?

This is a test of the emergency (JSHIT) broadcast system.  In the event that you find that a "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactic" has occurred please proceed to your nearest "plus one (+1) key" and "plus one" this post if you find it to be true, and some (JSHIT) has occurred.  If you do not believe that (JSHIT) has reared it's ugly head, and my averments are false, do not "plus one" this post, and leave a comment with your basis in fact and law for your opinion.

If you do not know what "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT)" are, well welcome to "The Casino Gaming Oracle."  You must be a "newbie."  All those familiar with this blog know that (JSHIT)  is my acronym for the bullshit judicial officers pull to effect injustice, especially when they are getting their ass kick in court, or they are owed a favor by the judge for not snitching on the judge or some other judicial officer, or "good ole boy's and girl's" network member. (JSHIT defined,click here)

TRUE or FALSE?

Release Notes  |   District CM/ECF Release 4.1  |  12/2/2009 says:

A1  All PACER Users

A1.1  Searching by Page ID Number

A new sequential pagination feature was developed in CM/ECF to provide a unique page  ID number for every page of each document  in a case. The page  ID numbers are sequenced in the order in which  the documents are filed in a case. If a user prints a set of documents, each page of the selected documents will display the same unique page number each time it is printed or viewed, provided the PDF Header feature is turned on.  

Through this new sequential pagination feature, permanent sequential page numbers are available,  so anyone accessing a document from the District court docket is assured of always referencing the same page. 

Those within the legal profession know what the "PACER" and or "CM/ECF" electronic court filing system is.  For those outside this realm, it is the system used to electronically file documents with a court of law.

The above "Release Note" from "PACER" alerts all lawyers that as of 12/2/2009, this system was upgraded to add a unique "Page ID Number" to each document one files within a court of law that has such a system in place. The following is an example of a page file within the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the "Page ID Number" is "809" as seen in the top right-hand corner of the page.

 Please, reread the last sentence of the first paragraph, stating: "provided the PDF Header feature is turned on."  Lawyer, correct me if I'm wrong but all document filed with courts having this system, have page ID numbers on all document filed with that court after December 2, 2009, right?

The above example of [Document 40] filed on 12/ 15/09 confirms that "Page ID Numbers" are being assigned to documents filed within the U.S. Dist. Court for the District of New Jersey.

My question is why would some judicial office, and I say judicial office, because only judicial officers have access to the "pdf Header Feature" button which is on the equipment at the "Clerk of the Courts" office correct?

So, any document entered on a "PACER" system lacking a page ID number means that some judicial officer has turned off the "pdf header feature" correct.  Once we can attribute to inadvertence, twice two lack of training, but three times has to be willful, and any thing more has to reflect some (JSHIT) going on.

So, here are a few more "pdf Headers" form actual document filed within civil action 08-cv-02407.  Soon to be know or caption "In Re: the Matter of Noel L. Hillman's (JSHIT).

• 36 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 36    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 70 PageID: 603

• 37 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 37    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 2

• 38 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 38    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 1

• 39 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 39    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 133 PageID: 676

• 40 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 40    Filed 12/15/09   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 809

• 42 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 42    Filed 01/07/10   Page 1 of 3

• 43 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 43    Filed 01/19/10   Page 1 of 1

• 44 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 44    Filed 01/19/10   Page 1 of 38

• 56 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 56    Filed 04/20/10   Page 1 of 14

•  60 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 60    Filed 05/03/10   Page 1 of 5

Knowing that birds of a feather, stick together, the ten examples above, span a six month period, as to eliminate those that would say the practice hadn't set in yet. I posit that if I can show that only 3 out of 10 filing in the above case have "Page ID number," and all of the documents were filed after 12/2/09, someone has willfully tampered with the "pdf Header button." TRUE OF FALSE?  +1 this post for (True), leave a comment and back it up if you think my inference is false and (JSHIT) is not lurking in this instance.

Thank you for viewing this blog, and please continue to share it with friends, the support is oh so encouraging.

The Casino Gaming Oracle!

P.S.  Don't forget +1 = True, Comment with all false answers and or responses. Lawyers and those with PACER access, note that the docket number in the examples above are linked, I lack the funds to pay my PACER bill so I can not check the link, let me know if its not working, so I can remove, Thanks!