This is Some (JSHIT), True or False?

This is a test of the emergency (JSHIT) broadcast system.  In the event that you find that a "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactic" has occurred please proceed to your nearest "plus one (+1) key" and "plus one" this post if you find it to be true, and some (JSHIT) has occurred.  If you do not believe that (JSHIT) has reared it's ugly head, and my averments are false, do not "plus one" this post, and leave a comment with your basis in fact and law for your opinion.

If you do not know what "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT)" are, well welcome to "The Casino Gaming Oracle."  You must be a "newbie."  All those familiar with this blog know that (JSHIT)  is my acronym for the bullshit judicial officers pull to effect injustice, especially when they are getting their ass kick in court, or they are owed a favor by the judge for not snitching on the judge or some other judicial officer, or "good ole boy's and girl's" network member. (JSHIT defined,click here)

TRUE or FALSE?

Release Notes  |   District CM/ECF Release 4.1  |  12/2/2009 says:

A1  All PACER Users

A1.1  Searching by Page ID Number

A new sequential pagination feature was developed in CM/ECF to provide a unique page  ID number for every page of each document  in a case. The page  ID numbers are sequenced in the order in which  the documents are filed in a case. If a user prints a set of documents, each page of the selected documents will display the same unique page number each time it is printed or viewed, provided the PDF Header feature is turned on.  

Through this new sequential pagination feature, permanent sequential page numbers are available,  so anyone accessing a document from the District court docket is assured of always referencing the same page. 

Those within the legal profession know what the "PACER" and or "CM/ECF" electronic court filing system is.  For those outside this realm, it is the system used to electronically file documents with a court of law.

The above "Release Note" from "PACER" alerts all lawyers that as of 12/2/2009, this system was upgraded to add a unique "Page ID Number" to each document one files within a court of law that has such a system in place. The following is an example of a page file within the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the "Page ID Number" is "809" as seen in the top right-hand corner of the page.

 Please, reread the last sentence of the first paragraph, stating: "provided the PDF Header feature is turned on."  Lawyer, correct me if I'm wrong but all document filed with courts having this system, have page ID numbers on all document filed with that court after December 2, 2009, right?

The above example of [Document 40] filed on 12/ 15/09 confirms that "Page ID Numbers" are being assigned to documents filed within the U.S. Dist. Court for the District of New Jersey.

My question is why would some judicial office, and I say judicial office, because only judicial officers have access to the "pdf Header Feature" button which is on the equipment at the "Clerk of the Courts" office correct?

So, any document entered on a "PACER" system lacking a page ID number means that some judicial officer has turned off the "pdf header feature" correct.  Once we can attribute to inadvertence, twice two lack of training, but three times has to be willful, and any thing more has to reflect some (JSHIT) going on.

So, here are a few more "pdf Headers" form actual document filed within civil action 08-cv-02407.  Soon to be know or caption "In Re: the Matter of Noel L. Hillman's (JSHIT).

• 36 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 36    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 70 PageID: 603

• 37 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 37    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 2

• 38 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 38    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 1

• 39 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 39    Filed 12/14/09   Page 1 of 133 PageID: 676

• 40 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 40    Filed 12/15/09   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 809

• 42 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 42    Filed 01/07/10   Page 1 of 3

• 43 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 43    Filed 01/19/10   Page 1 of 1

• 44 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 44    Filed 01/19/10   Page 1 of 38

• 56 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 56    Filed 04/20/10   Page 1 of 14

•  60 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW   Document 60    Filed 05/03/10   Page 1 of 5

Knowing that birds of a feather, stick together, the ten examples above, span a six month period, as to eliminate those that would say the practice hadn't set in yet. I posit that if I can show that only 3 out of 10 filing in the above case have "Page ID number," and all of the documents were filed after 12/2/09, someone has willfully tampered with the "pdf Header button." TRUE OF FALSE?  +1 this post for (True), leave a comment and back it up if you think my inference is false and (JSHIT) is not lurking in this instance.

Thank you for viewing this blog, and please continue to share it with friends, the support is oh so encouraging.

The Casino Gaming Oracle!

P.S.  Don't forget +1 = True, Comment with all false answers and or responses. Lawyers and those with PACER access, note that the docket number in the examples above are linked, I lack the funds to pay my PACER bill so I can not check the link, let me know if its not working, so I can remove, Thanks!

Exposing The Judicial Niggard's

Before we go any further, and you delve into reading this blog post I wrote: I hope you don't mind, but let me clear my throat, and or make a few things clear.

So that no one takes immediate offense to this posts title let me define the context of its meaning.  I have already established that I am African-American, and just because of my skin tone, I am not the first pot to call the kettle black, so to speak.

But when one is stingy, miserly, and stubborn in the due administration of the law, I must call it as I see it.  Niggardly administration of the law, that's what I am talking about here folks.  And in this second round, nothing will change.  As always I will strive to present my averments based on facts and the law.

Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary defines "niggardly" as: "1.   grudgingly mean about spending or granting." When one references this source a photo of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and or District Judge Noel L. Hillman and U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams, will not be found. But…

One has been chosen to expose these "Judicial Niggard's," relay the facts ,and proof's so that John and Jane Q. Public may form their own opinions based upon said facts and the application of the law.

Please, if I may, I can not for the life within me determine how a word as defined above has transcended to become an epithet and or label of scorn to the African-American Community.  How could one race bearing the scars of the whip, be said to grudgingly grant his or her labor, or be mean when calling the whip-cracker, "Cracker?"  Yet to remove some of the pain of the lashes  of the whip and of the cutting of the tongue, this African-American community converts it into a coveted term that when used within the community can depending upon tone, relate dissatisfaction, to expressions of endearment. i.e. "Earl, that's my nigga."

Okay, thank you for letting me put that out there, back to the "Judicial Niggards."  Ask any lawyer and they will tell you that no judge has the hubris to openly tell an African-American lawyer, "Nigger please."  In the context of, "you can't possible expect me to rule according to your argument, when the "good ole boy's" say otherwise.

This is the situation we face in civil action 08-cv-02407.  Judge Noel L. Hillman and his band of judicial niggard's have hubris "out-the-ass" but instead of having the balls to stand on the law they will hide behind Hillman's and William's absolute immunity, plus pray that no Honorable judicial officer reads between the lines of their (JSHIT) to see that they are technically saying "Nigger Please," as I requested that they have the balls to do within my cover letter to Judge Williams dated 8/17/2009.  [See Dkt #32, averment #6 @ page 1-2]

The cove letter to Judge Williams should have alerted this band that plaintiff Hickson was not niggardly in any way shape or application of the word.   I now proceed in that same vein to share with you how I have come to the firm conclusion that I am dealing with a band of Judicial Niggard's hell bent on their practice of Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics, which depend upon the age old legal maxim: "Ab assuetis non fit injuria."  Which translates to: "no injury is done by things long acquiesces in."

Hence, I will not acquiesce in niggardly behavior.  I will expose those that have a proclivity towards being judicial niggard's, and I will further share all the facts and law's that I base my averments upon.  No "Bud" but here we go…

Within the next series of post I will share with you my basis in fact and law as to how Judge's Noel L. Hillman, Karen M. Williams, and their two "liars for hire," Christopher C. Mauro and DAG, Kathleen M. Bartus exhibit and reveal what can only be inferred as proclivities towards being "judicially niggardly."

Basis in law: U.S.C.S Fed. Civ. Rule 56, Interpretive Note 334.--Judgment subject to revision modification or vacation, holds:

"Partial summary judgment is not final judgment, but is pre-trial adjudication that certain issues are established for trial, and district court retains jurisdiction to modify Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) order at any time. Alberty-Velez v Corporacion de P.R. para la Difusion Publica (2004, CA1 Puerto Rico) 361 F3d 1, 93 BNA FEP Cas 550."

Lastly, today let me share with you a case that I remember by its citation which sort of tells us that it gives the people "natural gas."  The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said:

Gavin v. Peoples Natural Gas Co., 613 F.2d,482,484 (1980)

"Summary judgment is inappropriate if there remains in the case a genuine issue as to any material fact. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)."

Man! Do I have some genuine issues of material facts to show and tell, so please stay tuned for part two, where I will set before you the documentary proof's that the above wrongdoer's are operating contrary to the law.

 So please continue to tell a friend or two about this cause. They don't have to be lawyers or law students, just those concerned about their Constitutional Rights and the integrity of their Court's and it's judicial officers.  Oh and I won't tell "who let the dogs out."

Thank you for viewing, and I hope you appreciate the time that I was away researching and would have it no other way.  He's Baaaack!

Gaming Oracle!

Acting vs. Reacting

Hello out there in Blogger Ville. The regular viewers of this blog have already figured out that I am in the process of acting upon my adversaries reactions to the stimulus that I set before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Some of the lawyers out there are going: "what the hell?"  For all of the non-lawyer types like myself, they are saying that because they don't call complaints and motion papers stimuli. But as I will set forth below, that's what they (complaints and motions before the court) amount too.  Let's see how by examining my basis in fact and law, then as you already know, you can be the judge.

 To keep this post as simple as possible lets look at the Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary's definition of the following:

• Act-  2: to take action: Move 3: to conduct oneself: Behave 4: to perform a specific function: Serve.

• React-  1: to exert a reciprocal or counteracting force or influence 2: to change in response to a stimulus.

• Reaction- 1a: the act or process or an instance of reacting b: resistance or opposition to a force, influence or movement;

You know what folks, this post is going to need several parts to make this point clear.  As I am writing this I can see it coming, because I set out writing this post for you to show you how they (the "liars for hire" and judges Hillman and Williams) want me to react to their Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT).

 So, I'll tell you what, look at the definition above once more.  No, read each on again, and before proceeding make sure you understand these basic terms.  Go ahead I'll wait, but hurry up before the (JSHIT) starts rolling back downhill. 

Okay, everybody with me?  You be the judge now, because I will show you in the forth coming posts that "the liars for hire," judges Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams are "acting."  Not as defined above but as "2act" is defined within the same dictionary which holds:

• 2act-  1a: to perform on the stage b: to behave as if performing on the stage: PRETEND

Yes they are pretending to administer "justice" on their stage, which just so happens to be our United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.  I say we reclaim this venue folks.  That's what this blog is all about.  That Court is there for you and I to seek redress, but when we bop or ass in there alone the corrupt judicial officers take offense and try to provoke us into acting out of frustration in our inability to get justice.

If you don't think so, you know I have a basis in fact for you to ponder. This is the reaction of a pro se litigant that also fell prey to (JSHIT). I've chose to take a different route, with you help and support of course. So, without further delay here below is an example of how Judge Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams want me to react. I think their reasons for wanting said reaction from me should be apparent from the video below.

Now you can see why I constantly thank you for your views and support.  Please continue to share this cause with your friends and colleagues, so that this wart upon the court can be eviscerated.  "Acting vs. Reacting II" on the way.

Thank you,

Gaming Oracle!