Acting vs. Reacting II

Thank you for joining in my posts on Acting vs. Reacting.  This is the second post in the series.  Within the first article "Acting vs.Reacting" I shared the definitions of the terms: (1) act, (2) react, (3) reaction, and (4) acting. 

If you are just joining us on this topic please click the preceding link, so that you will understand the context that these terms are used throughout this discussion of Acting vs. Reacting.

 In this article I submit that Judges Noel L. Hillman, Karen M. Williams, Christopher C. Mauro and DAG, Kathleen M. Bartus are pretending to be moral judicial officer, when the facts are to the contrary.

For our Courts to serve those within its jurisdiction, all judicial officers of that court should take action (MOVE), conduct themselves (BEHAVE), and perform the specific function of the due administration of justice (SERVE), in accordance with the law.

When the judicial officers of a court comply with the above, the public it serves can have confidence in said court.  If a judicial officer is found to "act" contrary to the above, he or she is not upholding their oath to uphold the highest law of the United States of America, the Constitution of the United States of America.

 Those familiar with this blog know that I have filed a motion seeking the recusal of judges Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams.  For those that aren't aware of this fact, or forgot it, you can review this fact at: "Absolute Immunity via Recusal."

Judge Noel L. Hillman, wanting to present the appearance that he is "just," did issue a hearing date of February 21, 2012, to render a decision on the motion seeking his recusal.  The physical evidence supports this act of Hillman's.  But, what is hidden is the fact that said act was nothing but Hillman's "reaction" to conceal his perfidy to uphold his oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. (I guess such behavior is to be expected from one following in the footsteps of one of his former defendants. See "Abramoff Should Be Flattered.")

 The act of setting the date of Feb. 21, 2012 was made 33 minutes after the motion was filed.  How many lawyers out there can say that they normally receive such a speedy response from a judge. (I'll wait...)  Not to many huh? You'd have to be standing in front of the judge to get a response that quick, even then, you'll have to pray he doesn't call a recess, or it's not to close to lunch.

If judge Hillman writes that he will "take action (MOVE)" on 2/21/2012, why is it that as of April 17, 2012, there is no physical evidence that he has moved on this motion?  Do you agree that justice delayed is justice denied?  Well it was written that the motion to recuse would be moved upon on 2/21/2012.  Yes, that's what was written and it's not what was done. Hence, Noel L. Hillman was acting.

 He was presented with the stimulus, and 54 days after the purported hearing date there is no response. Hmm?  But wait, the plot thickens, or should I say the (JSHIT) deepens. I will reveal further facts that show this judges lack of integrity.  Said lack of integrity going beyond his proselytization of Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams. (See Proselytization of KMW)

Without an answer to the motion to recuse himself, judge Noel L. Hillman is pretending to serve as a U.S. District Judge, when in fact he is not doing so, and he is not just running a little behind on conducting the business of the Court.   Do you agree?

Thank you for viewing, and please join me for the next post.

Gaming Oracle!

Acting vs. Reacting

Hello out there in Blogger Ville. The regular viewers of this blog have already figured out that I am in the process of acting upon my adversaries reactions to the stimulus that I set before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Some of the lawyers out there are going: "what the hell?"  For all of the non-lawyer types like myself, they are saying that because they don't call complaints and motion papers stimuli. But as I will set forth below, that's what they (complaints and motions before the court) amount too.  Let's see how by examining my basis in fact and law, then as you already know, you can be the judge.

 To keep this post as simple as possible lets look at the Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary's definition of the following:

• Act-  2: to take action: Move 3: to conduct oneself: Behave 4: to perform a specific function: Serve.

• React-  1: to exert a reciprocal or counteracting force or influence 2: to change in response to a stimulus.

• Reaction- 1a: the act or process or an instance of reacting b: resistance or opposition to a force, influence or movement;

You know what folks, this post is going to need several parts to make this point clear.  As I am writing this I can see it coming, because I set out writing this post for you to show you how they (the "liars for hire" and judges Hillman and Williams) want me to react to their Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT).

 So, I'll tell you what, look at the definition above once more.  No, read each on again, and before proceeding make sure you understand these basic terms.  Go ahead I'll wait, but hurry up before the (JSHIT) starts rolling back downhill. 

Okay, everybody with me?  You be the judge now, because I will show you in the forth coming posts that "the liars for hire," judges Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams are "acting."  Not as defined above but as "2act" is defined within the same dictionary which holds:

• 2act-  1a: to perform on the stage b: to behave as if performing on the stage: PRETEND

Yes they are pretending to administer "justice" on their stage, which just so happens to be our United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.  I say we reclaim this venue folks.  That's what this blog is all about.  That Court is there for you and I to seek redress, but when we bop or ass in there alone the corrupt judicial officers take offense and try to provoke us into acting out of frustration in our inability to get justice.

If you don't think so, you know I have a basis in fact for you to ponder. This is the reaction of a pro se litigant that also fell prey to (JSHIT). I've chose to take a different route, with you help and support of course. So, without further delay here below is an example of how Judge Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams want me to react. I think their reasons for wanting said reaction from me should be apparent from the video below.

Now you can see why I constantly thank you for your views and support.  Please continue to share this cause with your friends and colleagues, so that this wart upon the court can be eviscerated.  "Acting vs. Reacting II" on the way.

Thank you,

Gaming Oracle!