tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-73878184255067540422024-03-06T02:16:59.204-08:00Casino Gaming OraclePro se litigant exposes Atlantic City, NJ Casinos machination using Casino Gaming and Gambling Laws to deny patrons Civil and U.S. Constitutional Rights.Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.comBlogger105125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-595977718796152452012-08-08T10:39:00.000-07:002012-08-08T10:39:36.144-07:00This is Some (JSHIT), True or False?<br />
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/xWjx987tD5M?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">This is a
test of the emergency (JSHIT) broadcast system.
In the event that you find that a "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic
Injustice Tactic" has occurred please proceed to your nearest "plus
one (+1) key" and "plus one" this post if you find it to be
true, and some (JSHIT) has occurred. If
you do not believe that (JSHIT) has reared it's ugly head, and my averments are
false, do not "plus one" this post, and leave a comment with your
basis in fact and law for your opinion.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbXWZ7umY08Q7P5oYAAEdPtGHWwEBNYvJXck00S2tBZKKk2jqSM9gPYizCutXhhNwaVOlxc3j9cNgzAdpGsRlRfNBFuuEQHr75Bmv-PS28NYMkeHOJdr5M7v_QrbtaeGIF8al8glij2wg/s1600/IMAG0991.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="196" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbXWZ7umY08Q7P5oYAAEdPtGHWwEBNYvJXck00S2tBZKKk2jqSM9gPYizCutXhhNwaVOlxc3j9cNgzAdpGsRlRfNBFuuEQHr75Bmv-PS28NYMkeHOJdr5M7v_QrbtaeGIF8al8glij2wg/s200/IMAG0991.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">If you do
not know what "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT)"
are, well welcome to "The Casino Gaming Oracle." You must be a "newbie." All those familiar with this blog know that
(JSHIT) is my acronym for the bullshit
judicial officers pull to effect injustice, especially when they are getting
their ass kick in court, or they are owed a favor by the judge for not
snitching on the judge or some other judicial officer, or "good ole boy's
and girl's" network member. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">(</span><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/02/jshit-judicial-stealthy-hubristic.html" style="font-size: 12pt;">JSHIT defined,click here</a><span style="font-size: 12pt;">)</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">TRUE or FALSE?</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Release
Notes |
District CM/ECF Release 4.1
| 12/2/2009 says:</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0in 0.375in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">A1 All PACER Users</span> </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0in 0.375in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">A1.1 Searching by Page ID Number</span> </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0in 0.375in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0in 0.375in;">
A new sequential pagination feature was developed in CM/ECF
to provide a unique page ID number for
every page of each document in a case.
The page ID numbers are sequenced in the
order in which the documents are filed
in a case. If a user prints a set of documents, each page of the selected
documents will display the same unique page number each time it is printed or
viewed, provided the PDF Header feature is turned on. </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0in 0.375in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0in 0.375in;">
Through this new sequential pagination feature, permanent
sequential page numbers are available,
so anyone accessing a document from the District court docket is assured
of always referencing the same page. </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Those
within the legal profession know what the "PACER" and or
"CM/ECF" electronic court filing system is. For those outside this realm, it is the
system used to electronically file documents with a court of law. </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
The above
"Release Note" from "PACER" alerts all lawyers that as of
12/2/2009, this system was upgraded to add a unique "Page ID Number"
to each document one files within a court of law that has such a system in
place. The following is an example of a page file within the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey, the "Page ID Number"
is "809" as seen in the top right-hand corner of the page. </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Please, reread the last sentence of the first paragraph,
stating: "provided the PDF Header feature is turned on." Lawyer, correct me if I'm wrong but all
document filed with courts having this system, have page ID numbers on all
document filed with that court after December 2, 2009, right?</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">The above example of [Document 40] filed on 12/ 15/09
confirms that "Page ID Numbers" are being assigned to documents filed
within the U.S. Dist. Court for the District of New Jersey.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">My question is why would some judicial office, and I say
judicial office, because only judicial officers have access to the "pdf
Header Feature" button which is on the equipment at the "Clerk of the
Courts" office correct?</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyl_NyEmBj_kWQK5sjQeaRj2GrAyI8hvfOOiwc4zdW1drMSGK9muz7Y-S79BvzsXWCUXiOJE6tdo9PeG4ok7ACFnvI3Ba0OIQTRO1I5gspRSBgYO6Sjtmgee_RIMh_D3eUGaAYRaTClfc/s1600/MP900400500.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyl_NyEmBj_kWQK5sjQeaRj2GrAyI8hvfOOiwc4zdW1drMSGK9muz7Y-S79BvzsXWCUXiOJE6tdo9PeG4ok7ACFnvI3Ba0OIQTRO1I5gspRSBgYO6Sjtmgee_RIMh_D3eUGaAYRaTClfc/s200/MP900400500.JPG" width="159" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">So, any document entered on a "PACER" system
lacking a page ID number means that some judicial officer has turned off the
"pdf header feature" correct.
Once we can attribute to inadvertence, twice two lack of training, but
three times has to be willful, and any thing more has to reflect some (JSHIT)
going on.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">So, here are a few more "pdf Headers" form actual
document filed within civil action 08-cv-02407.
Soon to be know or caption "In Re: the Matter of Noel L. Hillman's
(JSHIT).</span></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=168&dm_id=3864030&doc_num=36&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">36</span></a><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
36 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 70 PageID: </span><span style="background-color: yellow; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-size: 12pt;">603</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=170&dm_id=3864075&doc_num=37&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">37</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
37 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 2</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=172&dm_id=3866004&doc_num=38&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">38</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
38 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 1</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=174&dm_id=3868233&doc_num=39&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">39</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
39 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 133 PageID: </span><span style="background-color: yellow; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-size: 12pt;">676</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=179&dm_id=3872835&doc_num=40&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">40</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
40 Filed 12/15/09 Page 1 of 2 PageID: </span><span style="background-color: yellow; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-size: 12pt;">809</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=184&dm_id=3914126&doc_num=42&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">42</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
42 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 3</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=186&dm_id=3930388&doc_num=43&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">43</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
43 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 1</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=189&dm_id=3931153&doc_num=44&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">44</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
44 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 38</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=237&dm_id=4146768&doc_num=56&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">56</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
56 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 14</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><a href="https://ecf.njd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_doc.pl?caseid=214881&de_seq_num=268&dm_id=4181081&doc_num=60&pdf_header=2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">60</span></a><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Case
1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
60 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 5</span></li>
</ul>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhtPDEKX2RRMHhXj9q8zj8gcal-2cZIzw6H3oeGOHVOFebxWfyl7iNSN5J6uSnuv7mtWEJXQulrdUw2fKKTpZecPCl3mDiYYS9mX0wg5mLLpGroZ0i3YzbTsHN-D_wVkM5ii3NerwnedfQ/s1600/MP900406520.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhtPDEKX2RRMHhXj9q8zj8gcal-2cZIzw6H3oeGOHVOFebxWfyl7iNSN5J6uSnuv7mtWEJXQulrdUw2fKKTpZecPCl3mDiYYS9mX0wg5mLLpGroZ0i3YzbTsHN-D_wVkM5ii3NerwnedfQ/s200/MP900406520.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Knowing
that birds of a feather, stick together, the ten examples above, span a six
month period, as to eliminate those that would say the practice hadn't set in
yet. I posit that if I can show that only 3 out of 10 filing in the above case
have "Page ID number," and all of the documents were filed after
12/2/09, someone has willfully tampered with the "pdf Header button."
TRUE OF FALSE? +1 this post for (True),
leave a comment and back it up if you think my inference is false and (JSHIT)
is not lurking in this instance.</div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCw8G0S0HMDgB4ceqHpvVFho0uOV3xWK4rP0NnSZeljZrs5iq__DAunX5ACRJP1A3YEZMWfQfa5rEsxdQev6uWdDY8aGZMLszJfSP5ZIHUb8rg0K8wX0ARC-kNzEdzPQtnA3eHrZ6Msq4/s1600/MM900173989.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCw8G0S0HMDgB4ceqHpvVFho0uOV3xWK4rP0NnSZeljZrs5iq__DAunX5ACRJP1A3YEZMWfQfa5rEsxdQev6uWdDY8aGZMLszJfSP5ZIHUb8rg0K8wX0ARC-kNzEdzPQtnA3eHrZ6Msq4/s1600/MM900173989.GIF" /></a></div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Thank you
for viewing this blog, and please continue to share it with friends, the
support is oh so encouraging.</span><br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino
Gaming Oracle!</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">P.S.</span>
Don't forget +1 = True, Comment with all false answers and or responses.
Lawyers and those with PACER access, note that the docket number in the
examples above are linked, I lack the funds to pay my PACER bill so I can not
check the link, let me know if its not working, so I can remove, Thanks!</div>
</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com33tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-5909157680371334562012-08-01T05:22:00.001-07:002012-08-01T05:22:06.498-07:00Time Doesn't Matter in NJ District Court<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEmLEEV0VTl2jK5YO16-oPLjHC2zrU74sL_nSUqtg4-1CxUhjl8qC8CwYH3cRI7ufjfWE-05yg7TV9wFzXifUFPhbeFVCNmdN7gREYzZx_R9BcXZ5y8j6AxjVtjuRHhUvR0ojAUkNC7NQ/s1600/MP900442242.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEmLEEV0VTl2jK5YO16-oPLjHC2zrU74sL_nSUqtg4-1CxUhjl8qC8CwYH3cRI7ufjfWE-05yg7TV9wFzXifUFPhbeFVCNmdN7gREYzZx_R9BcXZ5y8j6AxjVtjuRHhUvR0ojAUkNC7NQ/s200/MP900442242.JPG" width="150" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">The United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Camden, that is, is so
hubristic that time doesn't really matter there and here's quick proof.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
We
discussed the (JSHIT) the Clerk of the Court in the above court in the above
court utilize within my post entitled "<a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/clerk-of-court-can-rubber-stamp-or.html">Clerk ofCourt can Rubber Stamp or Initiate (JSHIT)."</a><span style="color: red;"> </span> Guess what folks, it's still the practice of
the day there. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhshHVyNaso1zMyZT6qlCTlYAAaS01-9S1JtHDNxAMPClzBTTLKsxsIeROuzloH69kkT8W2tTvFyRd60nO8D8R8q5wxdnng2fKt97OGB-HtVJZeZ4kEkNZ-30JYBDiSJjkIsJ3JqhLLxSo/s1600/IMAG1385.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhshHVyNaso1zMyZT6qlCTlYAAaS01-9S1JtHDNxAMPClzBTTLKsxsIeROuzloH69kkT8W2tTvFyRd60nO8D8R8q5wxdnng2fKt97OGB-HtVJZeZ4kEkNZ-30JYBDiSJjkIsJ3JqhLLxSo/s320/IMAG1385.jpg" width="253" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Anyone
filing a document there will tell you that it's always "8:30" in
Camden.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I was just there on Friday, July
27, to file my motion for a jury trial, and this practice was further revealed.
Not all of my viewers know that I'm back on my job, making injustice known, but
maybe some of them picked up this fact within the copy of the letter that I
wrote to Judge Hillman. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">(</span><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/07/swimming-with-so-called-judicial-sharks.html" style="font-size: 12pt;">See SwimmingWith the So Called Judicial Sharks</a><span style="font-size: 12pt;">)</span></div>
<div style="color: red; font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
On the
third page of the above cover letter I submitted to the Clerk of the court, I
wrote, "As my last filing was scheduled within 33 min. of me leaving your
office please tend to this matter in the same, and acknowledge by return of
"Notice of Filing," and a copy of the docket sheet for
08cv02407." </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Amazingly
federal rule of civil procedure 5 (d) (4) Acceptance by the Clerk, was adhered
to and the clerk did not refuse to file my paper, even though the court is
presenting that the case is closed.
Don't believe me? Look at the
photo of page 15 of the docket sheet below.
Docket entry 80 says: "ORDERED that the Clerk shall Close the
file…"</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy2LnhC0ySb_RDUUe2cffleChlac565E-8gTFnDMxPvunLOn_qLS8BnQRKbgAYfTWHF4w_0idCQkhxUGbSqBMvLmh6z-6lsFzb4137s-Xuemu6EsrKXDj-vv7lKkZfsrSR2AInULd0svk/s1600/IMAG1386.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy2LnhC0ySb_RDUUe2cffleChlac565E-8gTFnDMxPvunLOn_qLS8BnQRKbgAYfTWHF4w_0idCQkhxUGbSqBMvLmh6z-6lsFzb4137s-Xuemu6EsrKXDj-vv7lKkZfsrSR2AInULd0svk/s320/IMAG1386.jpg" width="234" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Back up
speedy, we were talking about the time clock thing remember.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well take a look in the bottom right hand
corner and you will see that the computer stamp says that this document was
printed at 12:57PM.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I didn't quite get
the fast 33 min. attention I got before but considering that I left Atlantic
City on the 10:10AM bus, arrived in Camden a little after 11AM, was able to
walk back to the Camden bus terminal and catch the 11:35 AM bus back to
Atlantic City, and by the time I got off the bus my motion was filed.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixRe_MNIYhkV5B_cUf5dB0bMDfqeDilKO5IsUXRNSyjSFYsoJOnXW6_mawnWlfmJNRahErK-_I7KL8z0CX0_k7TLdLYl9xP92NsnKw_P7T0_icWEGuCAozWc5NxKeDptVucBhVHWQlQ8E/s1600/MP900448291.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="134" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixRe_MNIYhkV5B_cUf5dB0bMDfqeDilKO5IsUXRNSyjSFYsoJOnXW6_mawnWlfmJNRahErK-_I7KL8z0CX0_k7TLdLYl9xP92NsnKw_P7T0_icWEGuCAozWc5NxKeDptVucBhVHWQlQ8E/s200/MP900448291.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Back up
again speedy, you might have missed it.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The Clerk of the Court stamped the cover letter as "RECEIVED JUL 27
2012 AT 8:30,"</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">at the penalty of
perjury I'm telling you that I didn't leave to go to the court till 10:10AM, so
how did my paper get stamped at 8:30AM, before I got there, Hmm.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Some one is pulling your chain or the
judicial officer must be playing with their "ding-a-lings" instead of
doing there ministerial duties with integrity.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
But you be
the Judge, I'll start putting together some shocking misconduct that you'll
have to look at the documents and judge for yourselves. So practice with this one, take your time,
look over the documentary evidence, but hurry up...and I'll do the same with
exposing the real Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics of Judges Noel
L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPBr_jWFU5jVQ8fALeiQFI9XxS3wHwOwY6N4ZV6AzGnhLUkLpojrMBvmLsJqr4xieaeWZP0DwlJp7nKtlZM911kQztX2Kd-dGqKZHnLKcuIKuQ92CV_ZDZHXz4slYvphjdtFb6DIpS7jg/s1600/MM900284076.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPBr_jWFU5jVQ8fALeiQFI9XxS3wHwOwY6N4ZV6AzGnhLUkLpojrMBvmLsJqr4xieaeWZP0DwlJp7nKtlZM911kQztX2Kd-dGqKZHnLKcuIKuQ92CV_ZDZHXz4slYvphjdtFb6DIpS7jg/s1600/MM900284076.GIF" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">If time
matters to you, please take a few minutes to share this with a friend or
two.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">It's your judicial system too, time
does matter, and it's time that you judge the judges.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank you
for viewing, </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino
Gaming Oracle</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
P.S. I will be re-posting the above document so they will be larger, promise it'll be worth the wait!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-19416635502894487292012-07-30T20:31:00.001-07:002012-07-30T20:33:33.849-07:00Here Comes the Judge<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/qvPkWwXIVhk?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hear ye,
Hear ye, this court of internet justice is now in session, the Honorable
(Insert your Name) presiding.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Why,
should I be the judge you may be asking?</div>
<ol style="direction: ltr; font-size: 12pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="1">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;" value="1"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Because
those following this blog know that I often ask you to be the judge of the
facts and documents I present.</span></li>
</ol>
<ol style="direction: ltr; font-size: 12pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="1">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;" value="2"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
internet will be the down-fall of many-a-corrupt judicial officers.</span></li>
</ol>
<ol style="direction: ltr; font-size: 12pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="1">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;" value="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Many of
the Judges now sitting on the bench have become so hubristic that they are
taking the law into their own hands.</span></li>
</ol>
<ol style="direction: ltr; font-size: 12pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="1">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;" value="4"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Lawyers
appearing before the above judges are cowering in fear, rather than
reporting the judicial misconduct they witness, or they acquiesce to the
misconduct in hopes of gaining a favor or leverage at some later date.</span></li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">No one wants a
world full of "good ole boys and girls."</span></li>
</ol>
<ol style="direction: ltr; font-size: 12pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="1">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;" value="6"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">There is
no injustice until someone makes it known, but unless that one the
injustice is revealed to has power, the injustice will continue, unless
those that know grow in numbers and demand change.</span></li>
</ol>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Judge Noel
L. Hillman's hubris has grown to that level.
Imagine a United States District Judge stating that a litigant lacks
personal knowledge to make a claim.
Imagine that litigant is representing himself, and after spending ten
days in a county jail, defending false charges whereby they are terminated in
his favor, and then doing a year of legal research to learn how to present
documentary evidence attached to a complaint, whereby said complaint demanded a
trial by jury and could not be dismissed as frivolous. (See <a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/consciousness-of-conundrum-ive-created.html">Consciousness of the Conundrum I've Created</a>)</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
In the
1970's when the song above was made, the United States District Courts were
blessed with truly honorable judges.
Judges that would not just voice their opinions but apply the law. Not only would the apply the law without bias
but they would set the stage to end the oppression of those oppressed by the
law. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjNCNYHoVpwvfil1spnX6A-nFRKBPa17auCXH_aKUS2sQYYUBwlEnlAZWx5bsBT7nUPm7T5jRRZVDQAyJR6II77-EwQpssf6wFFGzuT0EvkteXkJcFojsx7iHmJ_YeVPXUCIhN8cm4LUM/s1600/MC900150052.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="153" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjNCNYHoVpwvfil1spnX6A-nFRKBPa17auCXH_aKUS2sQYYUBwlEnlAZWx5bsBT7nUPm7T5jRRZVDQAyJR6II77-EwQpssf6wFFGzuT0EvkteXkJcFojsx7iHmJ_YeVPXUCIhN8cm4LUM/s200/MC900150052.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Judge Noel
L. Hillman attempts to take us back to that day and age. I didn't bop into his
court thinking that he would be my savior, nor did I crawl into his courtroom
pleading with a race card as my standing.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Nor did I enter the court through the back or side door, no, I was not
niggardly, I studied the law and expected it to be applied equally and where
established, I expected it to be judicially noticed.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
But I did
not get the above, so now this is where you come in. Check my circles on "G+," note the
gradual increase of "+1's" at this blog site, it should tell you
something. It should tell you that those in the know, know, and they are drawn
to the truth. Why, because for some it
is a truth that they dare not speak of. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFleyZCHude_llo83Pu4aAv6GN2HazR4cLDavSr0imQ1JzDrfYsTnyI-Fnov_C8vKGfuJ9UeTN66MngrbatkWM_ssv5NVLNmU9Vv3D55tQjtyKYGix-Q68O4JD54Wl8MBCciUhBQaSMmE/s1600/MP900284978.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="131" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFleyZCHude_llo83Pu4aAv6GN2HazR4cLDavSr0imQ1JzDrfYsTnyI-Fnov_C8vKGfuJ9UeTN66MngrbatkWM_ssv5NVLNmU9Vv3D55tQjtyKYGix-Q68O4JD54Wl8MBCciUhBQaSMmE/s200/MP900284978.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">They earn
their living as lawyers, they have to enter courtrooms where "good ole
boys and girls" rule, and if word got out that they were partial to a pro
se litigant spitting the truth, there could be hell to pay, by said "good
ole boys and girls" cutting the hell out of their paychecks, and or God
forbid "blacklisting" them.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_tKQQNkAnSC6T91ZbAI4wE6W-TFm8UAP7D3DZMgj7uH36eFol_9k3A_TV9B34HExOnzu1OdN-1a4xnDX5tt_AzGimWR0GCSlbMQB74sDCqEXwxlbXHiiWuN2Lv0QHrWnFt8tuIWhsxIY/s1600/MP900431767.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="171" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_tKQQNkAnSC6T91ZbAI4wE6W-TFm8UAP7D3DZMgj7uH36eFol_9k3A_TV9B34HExOnzu1OdN-1a4xnDX5tt_AzGimWR0GCSlbMQB74sDCqEXwxlbXHiiWuN2Lv0QHrWnFt8tuIWhsxIY/s200/MP900431767.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Not only
do these "good ole boys" swim around like great white sharks,
flaunting "top predator" appearances, while being cloaked with
absolute immunity, which bolsters their punk bitch mentalities so that they may
proselytize there weaker underlings and bring them into the fold. (</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 12pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/proselytization-of-kmw.html">See Proselytization of KMW</a></span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">)</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
This
venue will change the above. This venue
gives you the power to be the judge. Listen to Pigmeat, listen to the words,
hear their inner meaning. After
listening, take a minute to think, then decide what you will do to combat
injustice, and restore integrity to our courts. Here Comes the Real Judges!</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggI8BVHQ1bLww5AG4Rhnz_oQYRQSiiDLB4hcw72J6B47VdtE0Zlta_ciGixVinWNtJYuqyoj8jypIPPlFW2VxQqSTAxTCDZ55djGvR2oPxdzSXRSfI7ZOt3L7DRVchyphenhyphenor5zRhT5wpBfAU/s1600/MM900178190.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggI8BVHQ1bLww5AG4Rhnz_oQYRQSiiDLB4hcw72J6B47VdtE0Zlta_ciGixVinWNtJYuqyoj8jypIPPlFW2VxQqSTAxTCDZ55djGvR2oPxdzSXRSfI7ZOt3L7DRVchyphenhyphenor5zRhT5wpBfAU/s1600/MM900178190.GIF" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Thank
You, and please, start by sharing this blog with two or three friends.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
The
Casino Gaming Oracle</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-71614916949649671102012-07-30T01:09:00.000-07:002012-07-30T01:09:39.354-07:00Swimming With the So Called Judicial Sharks<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYm-t5n1_d5GNG001Vpb31AF7EKkhBlC9GOgkCwMekp7VJcKpbv_cwwNtNPkFgoj4qx9KF8nlLnDMR5JSHYo6o3LPawbVLJjpqlqpTUfmqtybeZvxhZKdDaFjLI4qujgV7sptX3bvBCDI/s1600/MC900070867.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="135" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYm-t5n1_d5GNG001Vpb31AF7EKkhBlC9GOgkCwMekp7VJcKpbv_cwwNtNPkFgoj4qx9KF8nlLnDMR5JSHYo6o3LPawbVLJjpqlqpTUfmqtybeZvxhZKdDaFjLI4qujgV7sptX3bvBCDI/s200/MC900070867.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now I'm
really back!</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In my last post "</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/05/exposing-judicial-niggards.html">Exposing The Judicial Niggard's</a></span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">," I had to ruffle
a few feathers, and put a few drops of blood in the water to keep the so called
"Sharks" and or my adversaries guessing as to my next move.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Yes, the
battle within Judge Noel L. Hillmans court continues within civil action
08-cv-02407, Hickson v. Harrah's. And
now that I have filed my Rule 38 Motion for a Trial by Jury as to the 202 issue
within the complaint, as put in issue by me making 202 allegations within the
complaint and all defendants denying each and every allegation, hence pursuant
to prevailing law, this matter should have been assigned a trial date. </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
But as you
are seeing through this blog, Judge Noel L. Hillman and his two "liars
of hire" are hell bent upon
depriving me of this right preserved by the Seventh Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States of America. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnD3LTZG-EHoTailUNZm4ZWjv49BfS_pEwk7-DF3ak4C1Q5Z6Vmi_5x1Jojwnc7ejnKUB-g22BgH-J9TQs103FcnukZJOyJ4o8uqk0Ia-51tq7IOXQVaTZ8n0SH4rrIN2OqnJsXwtlvDc/s1600/MC900324374.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnD3LTZG-EHoTailUNZm4ZWjv49BfS_pEwk7-DF3ak4C1Q5Z6Vmi_5x1Jojwnc7ejnKUB-g22BgH-J9TQs103FcnukZJOyJ4o8uqk0Ia-51tq7IOXQVaTZ8n0SH4rrIN2OqnJsXwtlvDc/s1600/MC900324374.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">So, how
will these sharks swim around Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38? I have many
theories, of which I will share with you, but fist, allow me to set the stage.
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 78.1(a), the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Jersey has published a list of "Motion Day's" for
2012.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">To have a motion heard on August
20, 2012, one must meet the "Initial filing deadline" of July 27,
2012.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeYvWW3gMKAQbQw5zz-ffIdp3XwhD86FiLXpFp7-gk2WKAY7zBpJI6iJsJXwE3x2rp3jJHjnT9cBx3PdhjCY64Dg-4dvnhoZR0MapQpCmPeO0HGBj7eN1q0uMXLh_dT9JTOVW4D0vEeqg/s1600/IMAG1305.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeYvWW3gMKAQbQw5zz-ffIdp3XwhD86FiLXpFp7-gk2WKAY7zBpJI6iJsJXwE3x2rp3jJHjnT9cBx3PdhjCY64Dg-4dvnhoZR0MapQpCmPeO0HGBj7eN1q0uMXLh_dT9JTOVW4D0vEeqg/s320/IMAG1305.jpg" width="250" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">As to
reduce the odds of more tampering with the document I file with the court, I
did on Friday, July 27, 2012 submit to the clerk of the court, on a
"CD" containing pdf formatted versions of:</span></div>
<ol style="direction: ltr; font-size: 12pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="1">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;" value="1"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Notice
of Motion for Trial by Jury Pursuant to FRCVP 38 and Recusal of Judges
Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 144 and 28
U.S.C.A. § 455.</span></li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Motion for Trial by
Jury Pursuant to FRCVP 38 and Recusal of Judges Noel L. Hillman and Karen
M. Williams Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 144 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 455. </span></li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Brief of Plaintiff
Earl D. Hickson in Support of Motion for Trial by Jury, Pursuant to FRCVP
RULE 38, and Recusal of Judges Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 144 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 455.</span></li>
</ol>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Will the
court respond as quickly as it did to my first recusal motion, as I shared with
you previously within the third paragraph of "<a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/day-43-and-still-no-response.html">Day43 and Still No Response</a>."
Only time will tell, but I'll let you know if I receive a notice from
the court in the mail today.</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
I will be
asking that you share this blog with as many people as you can, as the
integrity of the courts are of concern to all.
I mean no disrespect to all of the ethical judicial officers out there,
that do their all to maintain there integrity, uphold their oath's, and
preserve the "public trust" expected of their profession, but when
rogue so called "top predators" attempt to feed upon the weak, I must
make this injustice know. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZqMV3vurq9SuQdQGlp_LAO6U_HvpJlK1oi-uMFa8ZKWFvZXzVbCZ3XL4T2Rbdf1qEM6fDZgP3RwVmZ2TwNhwTQ-yo9wxG-tFnkhwcKP0DUBEJ4Oi0D7LlLo4-jKukgBLvB3EOAYY8U7Q/s1600/MP900407450.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZqMV3vurq9SuQdQGlp_LAO6U_HvpJlK1oi-uMFa8ZKWFvZXzVbCZ3XL4T2Rbdf1qEM6fDZgP3RwVmZ2TwNhwTQ-yo9wxG-tFnkhwcKP0DUBEJ4Oi0D7LlLo4-jKukgBLvB3EOAYY8U7Q/s200/MP900407450.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">As you
will see, I have found that it's not the practice of law causes lawyers to be
associated with being sharks, no, it's the failure to apply and follow the law
that makes them sharks.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Why? Those
familiar with this blog already know of the hubris this writer feels that these
so called sharks exhibit.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well now that
the feeding frenzy has begun let me share with you some of what a Judge and two
liars for hire have and will do, due to their "Great White Shark"
mentality.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
I have all
the documents ready to share with you, and I hope each and every one of my
readers rejoins and supports my efforts. So please tell two or three friends
that the Gaming Oracle is back and boy does he have some (JSHIT) to tell. </div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank you
for rejoining me and its great to be back!</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino
Gaming Oracle</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-77738829637069841152012-05-23T01:51:00.000-07:002012-05-23T01:51:50.827-07:00Exposing The Judicial Niggard's<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhcceVtF_Ig86gek3JX5h86TCJz0RWn4S4CIW_uYJnQ2Mph7XMg02wAtpxRaBxkWUqqqQG5qqcF_Cmnrggx6Bkv9bscoip7ydqy4gpfqzrLJArTUZoBYYi6rOEinnST3zEy2AVogq4szzo/s1600/MP900284884.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="131" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhcceVtF_Ig86gek3JX5h86TCJz0RWn4S4CIW_uYJnQ2Mph7XMg02wAtpxRaBxkWUqqqQG5qqcF_Cmnrggx6Bkv9bscoip7ydqy4gpfqzrLJArTUZoBYYi6rOEinnST3zEy2AVogq4szzo/s200/MP900284884.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">Before we go any
further, and you delve into reading this blog post I wrote: I hope you don't
mind, but let me clear my throat, and or make a few things clear.</span><br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
So that no one takes
immediate offense to this posts title let me define the context of its
meaning. I have already established that
I am African-American, and just because of my skin tone, I am not the first pot
to call the kettle black, so to speak. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiH9tc_w4yLu-YzEnWrAFHvxjeZFKgqfyoU7dnn0_bVeSmpFV5rsAKoEvSPoG65TMDABezt9GBVoThK4zZYIvmmw6d1qGHMP7wCSKgN0tKFq_7IZ_IHA9rS-vRteO3AL3f02pglv-CLuSI/s1600/MP900314154.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiH9tc_w4yLu-YzEnWrAFHvxjeZFKgqfyoU7dnn0_bVeSmpFV5rsAKoEvSPoG65TMDABezt9GBVoThK4zZYIvmmw6d1qGHMP7wCSKgN0tKFq_7IZ_IHA9rS-vRteO3AL3f02pglv-CLuSI/s200/MP900314154.JPG" width="183" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">But when one is
stingy, miserly, and stubborn in the due administration of the law, I must call
it as I see it. Niggardly administration
of the law, that's what I am talking about here folks. And in this second round, nothing will
change. As always I will strive to
present my averments based on facts and the law.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Merriam-Webster's 11<span style="vertical-align: super;">th</span> Collegiate Dictionary defines
"<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/niggardly">niggardly</a>" as: "1.
grudgingly mean about spending or granting." When one references
this source a photo of the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey, and or District Judge Noel L. Hillman and U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen
M. Williams, will not be found. But…</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF8mARbwW8E_mqVgl-9BznaQX5sU2_F-TwXYKNO0liZA5ybDaYlGYj8O_juAVNbehN_KEev7X80JP45hsedPa0dzGJ7QOlww_o11V0qQPCjrMWk5PmoZ3I2xe23ac57ItkmglUsErDbKc/s1600/MC900353639.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="151" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF8mARbwW8E_mqVgl-9BznaQX5sU2_F-TwXYKNO0liZA5ybDaYlGYj8O_juAVNbehN_KEev7X80JP45hsedPa0dzGJ7QOlww_o11V0qQPCjrMWk5PmoZ3I2xe23ac57ItkmglUsErDbKc/s200/MC900353639.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">One has been chosen
to expose these "Judicial Niggard's," relay the facts ,and proof's so
that John and Jane Q. Public may form their own opinions based upon said facts
and the application of the law.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIIw7HRbn6tApF6by_wZe_Vx4U3-lASCtxukKNyoJpTbRk8vDqZ5Iukq874WYCG1A4xm7YzGMZE_xaNK6TYR0TeSiznU7hGj5ZVFawGOXHmt0Hr32mE1sq7LpXcoJ6OcCYCQ6E_m72WoE/s1600/MC900150052.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="153" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIIw7HRbn6tApF6by_wZe_Vx4U3-lASCtxukKNyoJpTbRk8vDqZ5Iukq874WYCG1A4xm7YzGMZE_xaNK6TYR0TeSiznU7hGj5ZVFawGOXHmt0Hr32mE1sq7LpXcoJ6OcCYCQ6E_m72WoE/s200/MC900150052.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Please, if I may, I
can not for the life within me determine how a word as defined above has
transcended to become an epithet and or label of scorn to the African-American
Community. How could one race bearing
the scars of the whip, be said to grudgingly grant his or her labor, or be mean
when calling the whip-cracker, "Cracker?" Yet to remove some of the pain of the
lashes of the whip and of the cutting of
the tongue, this African-American community converts it into a coveted term
that when used within the community can depending upon tone, relate
dissatisfaction, to expressions of endearment. i.e. "Earl, that's my
nigga."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlIIy90vw_MqQ-L3hyP77X0yAC3on1PYX6UdekdlXCs1Fbcg3zm_Sdr1JMNA7oNgrN8_ardLRgA-gSwkB5sf33ckbbdpNtPSFA0SwltLUpcsWwoTx7MDzUbI_MapDHumVvM9cyFsX__IY/s1600/MC900059329.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlIIy90vw_MqQ-L3hyP77X0yAC3on1PYX6UdekdlXCs1Fbcg3zm_Sdr1JMNA7oNgrN8_ardLRgA-gSwkB5sf33ckbbdpNtPSFA0SwltLUpcsWwoTx7MDzUbI_MapDHumVvM9cyFsX__IY/s200/MC900059329.jpg" width="190" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Okay, thank you for
letting me put that out there, back to the "Judicial Niggards." Ask any lawyer and they will tell you that no
judge has the hubris to openly tell an African-American lawyer, "Nigger
please." In the context of,
"you can't possible expect me to rule according to your argument, when the
"good ole boy's" say otherwise.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
This is the
situation we face in civil action 08-cv-02407.
Judge Noel L. Hillman and his band of judicial niggard's have hubris
"out-the-ass" but instead of having the balls to stand on the law
they will hide behind Hillman's and William's absolute immunity, plus pray that
no Honorable judicial officer reads between the lines of their (JSHIT) to see
that they are technically saying "Nigger Please," as I requested that
they have the balls to do within my cover letter to Judge Williams dated
8/17/2009. <span style="font-size: 11pt;"> [See </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iH1LPNqOLoIchOMVfiijoO-_5gba0p8lwC6NiHIcmG8/edit" style="font-size: 11pt;">Dkt #32, averment #6 </a><span style="font-size: 11pt;">@ page 1-2]</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; color: red; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYsF-aEyFdP8HXFQh4WPmy4VOP_n-an-VOYJHJhi-B6Cj-Xvnt4pnOoSajSdgocJgv_2BOlbJpFt36mfnfR6ectTe9r_H0C8QTgRsl0x39XIZN50Sztd7uvON8Zj85BuJmxwL4ojiFhGY/s1600/MC900251253.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYsF-aEyFdP8HXFQh4WPmy4VOP_n-an-VOYJHJhi-B6Cj-Xvnt4pnOoSajSdgocJgv_2BOlbJpFt36mfnfR6ectTe9r_H0C8QTgRsl0x39XIZN50Sztd7uvON8Zj85BuJmxwL4ojiFhGY/s1600/MC900251253.jpg" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">The cove letter to
Judge Williams should have alerted this band that plaintiff Hickson was not
niggardly in any way shape or application of the word. I now proceed in that same vein to share
with you how I have come to the firm conclusion that I am dealing with a band
of Judicial Niggard's hell bent on their practice of Judicial Stealthy
Hubristic Injustice Tactics, which depend upon the age old legal maxim:
"Ab assuetis non fit injuria."
Which translates to: "no injury is done by things long acquiesces
in."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Hence, I will not
acquiesce in niggardly behavior. I will
expose those that have a proclivity towards being judicial niggard's, and I
will further share all the facts and law's that I base my averments upon. No "Bud" but here we go…</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4HEIl2dJWPK1sVHDjasOqbJ3Bny-nRv2OvZf1stcoS1zDggpjk9p1zO4hIZPlC8UXavKC1x1f7EmYW6eB1eqpCdK6A1kpzGbsReEfQIVpkG2VipDRCpLVIH338Iajzkrq-McuJ7T9538/s1600/MP900439239.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4HEIl2dJWPK1sVHDjasOqbJ3Bny-nRv2OvZf1stcoS1zDggpjk9p1zO4hIZPlC8UXavKC1x1f7EmYW6eB1eqpCdK6A1kpzGbsReEfQIVpkG2VipDRCpLVIH338Iajzkrq-McuJ7T9538/s200/MP900439239.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Within the next
series of post I will share with you my basis in fact and law as to how Judge's
Noel L. Hillman, Karen M. Williams, and their two "liars for hire,"
Christopher C. Mauro and DAG, Kathleen M. Bartus exhibit and reveal what can
only be inferred as proclivities towards being "judicially
niggardly."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Basis in law:
U.S.C.S Fed. Civ. Rule 56, Interpretive Note 334.--Judgment subject to revision
modification or vacation, holds: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
"<span style="font-style: italic;">Partial summary judgment is not final judgment, but
is pre-trial adjudication that certain issues are established for trial, and
district court retains jurisdiction to modify Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) order at
any time. Alberty-Velez v Corporacion de P.R. para la Difusion Publica (2004,
CA1 Puerto Rico)<a href="http://www.blogger.com/goog_505152853"> </a></span><span style="font-style: italic;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8552097999088771898&q=361+F3d+1&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">361 F3d 1</a></span><span style="font-style: italic;">, 93 BNA FEP Cas 550.</span>"</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Lastly, today let me
share with you a case that I remember by its citation which sort of tells us
that it gives the people "natural gas." The United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit said: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Gavin v. Peoples Natural Gas Co., <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7969892877596443884&q=613+F.2d,+482&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">613 F.2d,482</a>,484 (1980)</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
"Summary
judgment is inappropriate if there remains in the case a genuine issue as to
any material fact. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)."</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5B0p8TQS7dX1OEhkik8vJOpAkiU61feqGpMpJzIhXS8FwwEetDoBp5u1Hp5uCm2armknhphBTqRobVGBy_OQ-cg0rlDG4nICwkHtL9lHKxf97Raa2oHaf98vTjWnB7mYZiYahatye0lI/s1600/MC900060277.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5B0p8TQS7dX1OEhkik8vJOpAkiU61feqGpMpJzIhXS8FwwEetDoBp5u1Hp5uCm2armknhphBTqRobVGBy_OQ-cg0rlDG4nICwkHtL9lHKxf97Raa2oHaf98vTjWnB7mYZiYahatye0lI/s200/MC900060277.jpg" width="151" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Man! Do I have some
genuine issues of material facts to show and tell, so please stay tuned for
part two, where I will set before you the documentary proof's that the above
wrongdoer's are operating contrary to the law.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiK8czZ6PDdUGm7YzC6vFNy_lnk-8t6qTiGglJCkydYpKEUlEITBliBlGeqwh1tVkynoo5Qh7aMZDlMwy4LSuDQcP_aXFWVfwjQDM91nMTmXWDzH2mQ4XGolQRbtu-txnUU3GfaDBsU8bo/s1600/MP900431662.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiK8czZ6PDdUGm7YzC6vFNy_lnk-8t6qTiGglJCkydYpKEUlEITBliBlGeqwh1tVkynoo5Qh7aMZDlMwy4LSuDQcP_aXFWVfwjQDM91nMTmXWDzH2mQ4XGolQRbtu-txnUU3GfaDBsU8bo/s200/MP900431662.JPG" width="198" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"> So please continue to tell a friend or two
about this cause. They don't have to be lawyers or law students, just those
concerned about their Constitutional Rights and the integrity of their Court's
and it's judicial officers. Oh and I won't tell "who let the dogs out."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank you for
viewing, and I hope you appreciate the time that I was away researching and
would have it no other way. He's
Baaaack!</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Gaming Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-23142098569443746342012-05-07T00:29:00.000-07:002012-05-07T01:02:01.279-07:00Appreciating Those Viewing the First 100<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvKqEl_NDvDoJjabNlnBZWuWInuF9MrORb1A4aRcMqwmCEsvV5MscWb1lFek6ZN2_JBOXyZ6pjXVo-9WGsTO_VHokIiKwM9M2Fef4yYnfpeShSkJR45cjlehrGywzycyj_P5_cZGvLaWg/s1600/MC900154888.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvKqEl_NDvDoJjabNlnBZWuWInuF9MrORb1A4aRcMqwmCEsvV5MscWb1lFek6ZN2_JBOXyZ6pjXVo-9WGsTO_VHokIiKwM9M2Fef4yYnfpeShSkJR45cjlehrGywzycyj_P5_cZGvLaWg/s200/MC900154888.jpg" width="156" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I just wanted to
take the time to say thank you to each and every viewer of The Casino Gaming
Oracle.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This post marks a milestone, it
is the 100th post of this blog site.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
My much appreciated
loyal viewers know that I strive to thank each of you for viewing this
blog. From day one this blog has been my
vehicle to make the corruption and injustice exacted in Southern New Jersey
known. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCIQksM7uaJ4U_EmtLE5dSDzQaiP8SwQ-4ibXJROG4qCIU8SrLFvxF2s2lEpeOPduwZARq4pFNpHn-sXFkaYirvhbHeKJcca37AVMDXCrXq5HQaChGXHye62H4j1Dcl3BuQwatN_y5LrA/s1600/IMAG0856.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="123" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCIQksM7uaJ4U_EmtLE5dSDzQaiP8SwQ-4ibXJROG4qCIU8SrLFvxF2s2lEpeOPduwZARq4pFNpHn-sXFkaYirvhbHeKJcca37AVMDXCrXq5HQaChGXHye62H4j1Dcl3BuQwatN_y5LrA/s200/IMAG0856.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Trust me, it is not
easy getting the word out on injustice these days, especially on this
venue.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">With all the competition for you
viewership, I'm thankful to have made it this far.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Just look at the name of the blog.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Who would expect to read about legal matters,
or injustice from a site named the casino gaming oracle?</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
According to all the
so called laws of blogging this blog should not be relevant, but your continued
support tells a story to the contrary.
With this 100th post and over 7200 page views the word is spreading. Yeah, the law does not appeal to many. I mean with all of the Stumbling, Pinning,
and Insta-this, and Digging-that going on it's a wonder I get 10 views per
post. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgD0Uzj3AovYcL-St5Q27h3rB_TtY8PJ_T0LCVqrtTht8ONlMQndqu6X3ZBDgele6ZC5CKmC9eZLmVxqQaSpGGUXjgLiFr34zlRRqd4D6V8g5QmyTiddrhUqGYJCNFRVqyo_rFHe1EJcM/s1600/MP900321193.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgD0Uzj3AovYcL-St5Q27h3rB_TtY8PJ_T0LCVqrtTht8ONlMQndqu6X3ZBDgele6ZC5CKmC9eZLmVxqQaSpGGUXjgLiFr34zlRRqd4D6V8g5QmyTiddrhUqGYJCNFRVqyo_rFHe1EJcM/s200/MP900321193.JPG" width="142" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">But, as the numbers
are showing, there are some of you that care about this subject matter.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">To all the lawyers and other judicial
officers that support me, thank you, because I know and understand the
particular circumstances that you face in expressing any agreement you may have
with the concepts and truth's I'm setting forth.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yet I must say that if I were a lawyer I
would do all to protect my profession and acknowledge the truth when I see it.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
To date the most popular post are:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2011/12/hickson-v-acme-justice-corporation.html">Hickson v Acme Justice Corporation</a></span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">-
this is</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">overall introductory post as
to what this civil action is all about.
A great place to get up to speed in the corruption and the acronym
(JSHIT) is also introduced. For those that didn't get it, I titled this
post because our judge in this matter is just like the coyote, all his
"Acme (JSHIT)" fails.</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/absolute-immunity-via-recusal.html">Absolute Immunity Via Recusal</a></span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">- In
this post I introduce you to the motion for recusal by which the judges
could have saved their absolute immunity, but now that as of 5/7/2012 said
ruling on the motion is 76 days past due the 2/21/2012 hearing date, it
would appear that we have proof of further violation of my Constitutional
Rights. </span></li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/all-in-all-its-just-more-jshit-on-wall.html">All-In-All It's Just More JSHIT on the Wall</a></span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">- In this post I asked the question: You be the judge,
has the court been given notice that the plaintiff's are seeking the
recusal of these judges from civil actions 11-cv-06304 and 08-cv-02407?
After linking to my proofs this posts blasted it's way to the 3rd most
popular post, while being one of the youngest post on the list. </span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/analysis-of-third-circuit-case-law-on.html">Analysis of Third Circuit Case Law on Recusal Standards</a></span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">- The youngest
post on the list is part two of "All-In-All" above. It begins to support my allegations with
case law showing that Judge Hillman has no regard for his position. </span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/jshit-8-have-judge-that-will-lie.html">JSHIT #8, Have Judge That Will Lie!</a></span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">- The first sentence and
the title of the blog says it all. Not only do I make the claim but I back
it up too. </span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/proselytization-of-kmw.html">Proselytization of KMW</a></span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">- If there
was on post that I would hope the world could see it would be this one,
why? First of all you have a new African-American, female judge yielding
to the "Good ole Boy's Network." Enough said, why, because as a
judge gender, and race should not come into play, but then to fold under
pressure is unforgivable. Then this judge had the nerve to go out and give
a seminar on </span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://pl-pl.facebook.com/notes/theta-pi-omega-chapter-of-alpha-kappa-alpha-sorority-inc/us-magistrate-judge-karen-m-williams-to-give-the-keynote-address-at-the-social-j/285527518135559">Human Rights</a></span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"> to a sorority of African-American women that should be able to
look up to her. </span></li>
</ul>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHrCiFLoUlrRwaUiqWwl80ECitus6GcxTzmwzME6gop-Hy_6tAzPVTKsbrzGep8tWlVxzm2fa6VZzKYjBjeTCy7MgmlMqh0I_vGY2hgqy82dfCs-smZV8Ru_mzqwBZ_PKbJCqs3XPxYZQ/s1600/MP900443195.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="132" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHrCiFLoUlrRwaUiqWwl80ECitus6GcxTzmwzME6gop-Hy_6tAzPVTKsbrzGep8tWlVxzm2fa6VZzKYjBjeTCy7MgmlMqh0I_vGY2hgqy82dfCs-smZV8Ru_mzqwBZ_PKbJCqs3XPxYZQ/s200/MP900443195.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Please continue to
tune in as these civil actions are still on-going and the resolution is not
around the corner.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I do have actions to
take and I will see justice done. I will further need all the help I can get
from you, my viewers.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Please continue to
tell a friend or two and lawyers, if you must, have a friend comment for you
but do comment, and if you are not a lawyer and just have a question, please
ask it and I will do my best to answer it for you.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You one and
all, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Gaming Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-45979544719382516402012-05-02T21:28:00.000-07:002012-05-03T23:48:36.508-07:00Analysis of Third Circuit Case Law on Recusal Standards (part 2)<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-VQwfowJHDQFnMhCoOX8fqQe6jsfodi7oSVHt_XvnykeWtfl_MrvNKFih35KzADc1SXkRssAm4ZXSLivUhT6D424UCz95wTrTMytzNQPSVcHmZZpIjlQUb0XUX-2lgPXMOKj0LBAKIu4/s1600/MC900056529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-VQwfowJHDQFnMhCoOX8fqQe6jsfodi7oSVHt_XvnykeWtfl_MrvNKFih35KzADc1SXkRssAm4ZXSLivUhT6D424UCz95wTrTMytzNQPSVcHmZZpIjlQUb0XUX-2lgPXMOKj0LBAKIu4/s200/MC900056529.jpg" width="198" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">As promised from
"Analysis of Third Circuit Case Law on Recusal Standards" I have
returned to share more case law that Judge Noel L. Hillman thumbs his nose to,
and or is willfully ignorant of.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
In the above post we
looked at the 1989 case of U.S. v. Furst 886 F.2d 558. Here, lets take a look at the 1976 case that
was decided on September 1, 1976, Mims v. Sharp, 541 F. 2d 415, 416. Within that case at page 416 Judge Gibson
wrote: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
"<span style="font-style: italic;">That fourth contention is that in ruling on
appellants' motion to disqualify himself the district judge applied the wrong
legal standard under 28 U.S.C. § 144. We agree, and conclude that all
proceedings from December 10, 1974, the date of the § 144 motion, must be
vacated and the case returned to the district court for reassignment to a
different judge.</span>"</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW4mCqm7iSqtjcJAgcaxrGzel5Np_MhagQVAkAesSqSfnf21Tl2mZZzSnZdJb4c5MKoRwbxES3nmt-903Bn4Lud7N8NWgl2hbKCs8cyB59x3KUd8PqgjeoW86LTX099iMWFR3KqPm-5iI/s1600/MP900448704.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="132" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW4mCqm7iSqtjcJAgcaxrGzel5Np_MhagQVAkAesSqSfnf21Tl2mZZzSnZdJb4c5MKoRwbxES3nmt-903Bn4Lud7N8NWgl2hbKCs8cyB59x3KUd8PqgjeoW86LTX099iMWFR3KqPm-5iI/s200/MP900448704.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'll trust that if
there are any lawyer out there that disagree with my understanding of this
case, they will comment in correction below.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I understand the above case to say that after properly applying the
standards under 28 U.S.C. § 144, the above court agreed with the petitioner and
held the all proceedings from 12/10/1974, the date that the § 144 motion was
filed, must be vacated.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The above court
further said that because the judge misapplied § 144 the case would be returned
to the district court and reassigned to a different judge.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
How many remember
that in the 12<span style="vertical-align: super;">th</span> paragraph of "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/analysis-of-third-circuit-case-law-on.html">Analysis of Third Circuit Case Law on Recusal Standards</a></span>"
I referred to Judge Hillman's March 28, 2012, opinion as invalid? All those trained in the law, please correct
me if I'm wrong. If I filed my recusal
motion on January 18, 2012, seeking the recusal of Judges Noel L. Hillman and
Karen M. Williams from civil actions 08-cv-02407 and 11-cv-06304, Judge Noel L.
Hillman should not have proceeded and further in civil action 08-cv-02407,
correct?</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Well lets see, the
cover letter that I shared with everyone substantiates that I was at the clerks
desk on 1/18/2012. I discussed this fact in detail within the post entitled
"<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/hickson-vs-hillmans-williams-jshit.html">Hickson vs. Hillman's & Williams' (JSHIT)</a></span>."
That post also has a direct link to a copy of the cover letter also. But…</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
There will be some
nay-sayer's that will say that there is one key element that's missing, and that
would be the appearance that the motion for recusal was filed in regards to
civil action 11-cv-06304. Well lets take a closer look, because correct me if
I'm wrong again but Noel L. Hillman was put on notice that I was requesting his
recusal in both cases. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg54_qKktAgy-v7yIp7qPq6WMptS0-ujLhEwlAQ7sBwTlaAZs3i3TxJTAXB0o1zo2cmQOKX-CHkL4KFbbIyCKYWY-GrN6Y2SC1rk6-E5a6gDqAqifFdyP8Y9_XRIEnKSz3UjZ10bjDtjYA/s1600/MP900442242.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg54_qKktAgy-v7yIp7qPq6WMptS0-ujLhEwlAQ7sBwTlaAZs3i3TxJTAXB0o1zo2cmQOKX-CHkL4KFbbIyCKYWY-GrN6Y2SC1rk6-E5a6gDqAqifFdyP8Y9_XRIEnKSz3UjZ10bjDtjYA/s200/MP900442242.JPG" width="150" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">How about I save you
some time and tell you that averment #27 of the Motion for Recusal reads:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Noel L.
Hillman and Karen M. Williams cannot deny that the above averments #5 </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">through #26 unless supported by substantial evidence
to the contrary, support and offer </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">valid grounds for their recusal from civil action’s
1:11-cv-06304 and 1:08-cv-02407.</span> </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If there are still
some that must see things for themselves because they only believe half of what
they hear, well they can click the following link and scroll down to page 9 to
see <span style="color: red;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hIWRl5vDvXF_JjDpFa7Wxw0PiPuh9FDtDprMydmWDO8/edit">averment #27</a></span> at the top of the page. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgadVmjVynMuXNAM8k-wDtL-pEKkfw0GtA1bhQ3eYNg2YFHJ5cpINAFERiH8YF1XPn5eWdboVtY9HVLMjZJCpAoU1zg02X7Up2yCt6ZwaVNCOSldIWfYktrDEWQIhcdR5V7IZ5TqCSWgAU/s1600/MP900439324.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgadVmjVynMuXNAM8k-wDtL-pEKkfw0GtA1bhQ3eYNg2YFHJ5cpINAFERiH8YF1XPn5eWdboVtY9HVLMjZJCpAoU1zg02X7Up2yCt6ZwaVNCOSldIWfYktrDEWQIhcdR5V7IZ5TqCSWgAU/s200/MP900439324.JPG" width="132" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I had a very long
day, just as many of you have either ahead of you or behind you as well, but
there is another case I'd like to share with you so please return and view this
show stopper.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
About to bump my
head on the keyboard, but thanks for viewing,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Gaming Oracle!
ZZZzzzzz!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com18tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-49585357861930520562012-04-30T03:08:00.000-07:002012-04-30T03:08:12.739-07:00Analysis of Third Circuit Case Law on Recusal Standards<br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Can Judge Noel L.
Hillman claim that the case law I shared with you in "<span style="color: black;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/acting-vs-reacting-iii.html">Acting v. Reacting III</a></span>" only applies to the Texas
Rules of Civil Procedures? By now you
know how I do, so here's what the case law within Judge Hillman's Third Circuit
says. You be the judge. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYYjVn7scD-sSKavKyIQR6A9u-3e6GkSBlmcdKm8mNxgsFTWcOwjQf18ThQ_4BUjrjTguoOWxAubeHVWkfSsPIeRcYBNtRKIAG8V394XJLHorm72M3H8-xf8JncGQDu8PM9uD71WElikA/s1600/MP900401794.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYYjVn7scD-sSKavKyIQR6A9u-3e6GkSBlmcdKm8mNxgsFTWcOwjQf18ThQ_4BUjrjTguoOWxAubeHVWkfSsPIeRcYBNtRKIAG8V394XJLHorm72M3H8-xf8JncGQDu8PM9uD71WElikA/s200/MP900401794.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">The key issue stated
within</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><a href="http://www.houston-opinions.com/files/1stCoA-Riga-v-Comm-for-Lawyer-Discipline-by-Nuchia-recusal-motion-pending-order-void.mht" style="font-size: 11pt;">Riga
v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline</a><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> 224 S.W.3d 795 that I pointed out to
you within "Acting v. Reacting III" was the settling of the fact
that:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18a(c) requires a judge
who declines to recuse to </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">forward
the recusal motion to the presiding</span><span style="font-style: italic;">
judge of the administrative judicial region. Judge Fowler did this.
However, Rule 186a(c) further </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">requires that the trial judge may make no further orders and take no
further action prior to a hearing on the forwarded motion.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> The only exception provided by the Rule is </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">if the further order states good
cause for ruling</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> notwithstanding the
pending recusal motion.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Guess what folks,
I'm going to be waiting again, because the above case law say that: (1) Judge Noel
L. Hillman should have sent my motion for recusal to the Chief Judge of his
Court, (2) he was required to make no further orders and take no further action
in 08-cv-02407 and 11-cv-06304 prior to a hearing on the forwarded motion, and
(3) the only exception to the above Texas Rule of Civil Procedure is if the
further order states good cause for rulings notwithstanding the pending recusal
motion. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvUzop1Z0d1z_TKME_R-mxw-wwMZEhLBs5cejIiZD_GB4xi-tISEP12UHyEQH0REWtowWYKHh6_a2eHIoO9w2MR6TM1otaiQYQoPnAy3Z13-cBsTtdK9DPmFWVMSw9jhRQnk7u0jgG5kU/s1600/MC900078715.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvUzop1Z0d1z_TKME_R-mxw-wwMZEhLBs5cejIiZD_GB4xi-tISEP12UHyEQH0REWtowWYKHh6_a2eHIoO9w2MR6TM1otaiQYQoPnAy3Z13-cBsTtdK9DPmFWVMSw9jhRQnk7u0jgG5kU/s200/MC900078715.jpg" width="160" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">But, before you go
running of to see if the above was done by Judge Hillman we have to make sure
that we are comparing apples to apples as the old saying goes.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Let's not forget that the above is Texas
Rules.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So, what is the standard followed
within the jurisdiction of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well…</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
On September 22,
1989, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, said within United
States v. Furst that it was remanding the case back to the district court for
reassignment to a different district judge.
See last sentence of "Opinion of the Court" <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10699485039027940528&q=%C2%A0886+F.2d+558&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">U.S. v. Furst 886 F.2d 558</a></span>, 561 (1989). </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHjrhK4rxG6U6Dsy0Cd-jY57Pu5yrNllSS7HkxOTUKuWizBBezX415UvW2dY5WfY4KHfyBlskKLg54UbbCZ83gfwepNQXt1UNvduJJPb93Jm5EHuqgqzgKu956mTPqf9INGVUJL6lOwPg/s1600/MP900409656.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHjrhK4rxG6U6Dsy0Cd-jY57Pu5yrNllSS7HkxOTUKuWizBBezX415UvW2dY5WfY4KHfyBlskKLg54UbbCZ83gfwepNQXt1UNvduJJPb93Jm5EHuqgqzgKu956mTPqf9INGVUJL6lOwPg/s200/MP900409656.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Please don't yawn
yet, or just say "yeah-yeah-yeah, they remanded it so what was the remand
based on and how is it applicable here?"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well here's how.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">One reading further
into U.S. v. Furst, at page 583 will find that the court said:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">As a result of the extent to which the district court
confirmed the underlying facts upon which the recusal motion relied, </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">we need not resolve the
issue of whether a judge need accept as true the allegations presented in a
motion for disqualification under section 455 which asserts a basis as to which
section 144 is applicable and which includes an affidavit sufficient under
section 144</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. It is sufficient that we
state that where the basic underlying facts as set forth in the affidavit
supporting a recusal application are not in dispute, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">the district court should not
minutely examine the movant's characterization</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">of them, and
weigh the court's memory of what happened against that of the affiant</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. We think </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">it simply inappropriate</span><span style="font-style: italic;">
in the circumstances here f</span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">or the court to have made a credibility assessment of itself</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. Consequently, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">we hold that the district judge
improperly considered the truth of the asserted grounds for his recusal.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Thus, our </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">remaining inquiry is whether</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">the allegations were "legally sufficient" for recusal</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Here we are satisfied that the allegations of the motion and affidavit
for disqualification were sufficient to have required recusal, as taking the
allegations as true, the judge's impartiality,</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> though only in sentencing, might reasonably be questioned. 28 U.S.C. §
455(a). </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">According
to the attorney's affidavit</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, the judge
made it clear that he was anxious for a guilty plea and would award a longer
sentence to be served in unpleasant circumstances, following a conviction
trial. Thus, it was reasonable to conclude, taking the attorney's affidavit as
true, that the judge's attitude as to sentence was based at least to some
degree on the fact that the case had to be tried, an exercise which the judge
seemed anxious to avoid.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
There you have it
folks, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals said in 1989 that, (1) it is inappropriate for the court make a credibility assessment of itself, (2)
within this Circuit a motion to recuse is guided by the procedures of 28 U.S.C.
§ 144 and 28 U.S.C. § 455, (3) these two statutes say that a recusal motion and
it's supporting affidavit that contain legally sufficient allegations are to be
taken as true, especially when they are not disputed. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJqIYYPxrtGFb0vOXKwir3A0p9fr-X3dc4JY5idhGckLF13YodF5wGChzyXwTblZG6UJPj7lBScdY91hekR8FOHWzSZr89U_ZAomAODByH4lU5VC-EJyFM1a02HnIrMCwOx6pr3GnHPoQ/s1600/MC900056209.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJqIYYPxrtGFb0vOXKwir3A0p9fr-X3dc4JY5idhGckLF13YodF5wGChzyXwTblZG6UJPj7lBScdY91hekR8FOHWzSZr89U_ZAomAODByH4lU5VC-EJyFM1a02HnIrMCwOx6pr3GnHPoQ/s200/MC900056209.jpg" width="159" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">69 day's after
February 21, 2012, Judge Noel L. Hillman has not disputed the allegations of
the motion for his recusal.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yet on March
28, 2012, with a motion seeking his recusal from civil actions 08-cv-02407 and
11-cv-06304, and further proceedings forthcoming within the two civil actions,
Judge Hillman did exhibit </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">"willful
ignorance"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> towards the above case law, which is from his own United
States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZijv8aj6E9rWlGkvBm4ppNkdKl7C1ikKJzSpLHhiqpx0ZfC79ooRn8IW46DP7dH1_aVIn24oQWtywPbtNeIyW0qpEe-cl6cW8gtwBwAmFxphY9Zzr_JpTyU0v5fKl4Z-Jtf8sg-DxpOs/s1600/MC900054979.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="185" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZijv8aj6E9rWlGkvBm4ppNkdKl7C1ikKJzSpLHhiqpx0ZfC79ooRn8IW46DP7dH1_aVIn24oQWtywPbtNeIyW0qpEe-cl6cW8gtwBwAmFxphY9Zzr_JpTyU0v5fKl4Z-Jtf8sg-DxpOs/s200/MC900054979.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Okay, now you may
refer back to "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/all-in-all-its-just-more-jshit-on-wall.html">All-In-All Its Just More JSHIT OnThe Wall</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">" where I shared a link to Judge Hillman's March 28, 2012,
invalid opinion.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now you should have a
firm grasp as to why that post was entitled more JSHIT on the wall.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">But, if you listened to the included song,
which says "we don't need no education," you should agree with me
that Judge Noel L. Hillman does need an education.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Why? Because we don't need no dark JSHIT in
our courtrooms.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
But wait, there's
more. Okay-Okay, I know this is a bit
much so I'll continue with more case law that Judge Hillman thumbs his nose to
in my next post. May I ask that, if you
agree with the facts that I'm setting forth, will you invite a friend or two to
join us? We need all the help and support we can get, because Judge Noel L. Hillman has clearly bumped his head!</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzHm5Az-IrVzYBRT44WPXbn_1UnyZd2F05q03U8xOEey1JqyRFerfihCyMeEBcAiYvZdAOcvdBOKCsi_v8EdoOcIh8UnIOo8g5-aSqemUHdZY-wNqcOj2Z45MvZR9JCbAV3hebMf5yI9c/s1600/MC900280716.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzHm5Az-IrVzYBRT44WPXbn_1UnyZd2F05q03U8xOEey1JqyRFerfihCyMeEBcAiYvZdAOcvdBOKCsi_v8EdoOcIh8UnIOo8g5-aSqemUHdZY-wNqcOj2Z45MvZR9JCbAV3hebMf5yI9c/s200/MC900280716.jpg" width="193" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Thank you so much
for viewing,</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Gaming Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-23060966645152909102012-04-26T03:52:00.001-07:002012-04-26T03:52:59.425-07:00All-In-All Its Just More JSHIT On The Wall<br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/fvPpAPIIZyo?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe>Pause music below before clicking.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Day 65, and Noel L.
Hillman has yet to move on motion that he recuse himself from civil action
08-cv-02407 and 11-cv-06304. Yet he has slung more JSHIT on the walls of
justice, and at some point the people must demand that this injustice be
stopped. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Let's look at the
facts. Keep in mind that what I state here within this blog does not constitute
facts unless I can substantiate said facts with proof's to support them. Hence,
whenever I make a claim in this blog a try to support my claim with some form
of evidence, just like I've done in the civil actions I'm sharing with you. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUcr7MjIF4tV4ZUT_EWIG0mr34uG-CUlxdFv5_DwQKDk1hv_bkus-hNUy7DGm48FoxjKogv0pU30saazNdEt6VGU2vDM6RIHUJjxMEFIbA4IsLTpCI-k2kIve8X5E6r2lb5JgPS68e7xY/s1600/MC900037062.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUcr7MjIF4tV4ZUT_EWIG0mr34uG-CUlxdFv5_DwQKDk1hv_bkus-hNUy7DGm48FoxjKogv0pU30saazNdEt6VGU2vDM6RIHUJjxMEFIbA4IsLTpCI-k2kIve8X5E6r2lb5JgPS68e7xY/s200/MC900037062.jpg" width="179" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I shared with you
via "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/absolute-immunity-via-recusal.html">Absolute Immunity via Recusal</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"
that a "28 U.S.C.A. § 1746 Declaration of Bias or Prejudice and Motion for
Recusal of U.S.D.J. Noel L. Hillman and U.S.M.J. Karen M. Williams" was
filed with the Court.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That post has a
direct link to the document, and hopefully all that follow this blog have
clicked this link to confirm that this is a fact.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If not, by now you know the drill, click the
link to the post now...I'll wait.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Fact, </span>averment #27 of the above Motion for
Recusal of U.S.D.J. Noel L. Hillman and U.S.M.J. Karen M. Williams states: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Noel L.
Hillman and Karen M. Williams cannot deny that the above averments #5 </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">through #26 unless supported by substantial evidence
to the contrary, support and offer </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">valid grounds for their </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">recusal from civil action’s
1:11-cv-06304 and 1:08-cv-02407</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSlN5nMAmigLv0GP_gECgKHCiuRpXlT7m8zFOlQtw4K-BpkdRiIMZ0wghyphenhyphenKxftM4oH5nzMSsgEWz4C_ztrxxi3N0fWmAebd9a-bui503P5C3H1mMtSxAwqa25CpSpG8-IwS738miRPewU/s1600/MM900178190.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSlN5nMAmigLv0GP_gECgKHCiuRpXlT7m8zFOlQtw4K-BpkdRiIMZ0wghyphenhyphenKxftM4oH5nzMSsgEWz4C_ztrxxi3N0fWmAebd9a-bui503P5C3H1mMtSxAwqa25CpSpG8-IwS738miRPewU/s1600/MM900178190.GIF" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
You be the judge,
has the court been given notice that the plaintiff's are seeking the recusal of
these judges from civil actions 11-cv-06304 and 08-cv-02407? With that set
forth, and considering the fact that we are not face-to-face, let me tell you
that I have not received any document stating that the motion was given to the
chief judge, nor some 65 days after February 21, 2012 have I received anything
from judge Noel L. Hillman. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Within "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/acting-vs-reacting-iii.html">Acting vs. Reacting III</a></span>" I shared with you that
there was a cat to be let out of the bag.
To keep my word, and to try and be as brief as possible, I'm getting to
that here, but first I'd like to make sure that all understand that what I am
revealing is based upon solid facts.
Said facts have further support in being grounded in decisional and
statutory laws and rules. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSekV5LveYCG-phcL9CkBBn23qju92TpvbLM7x-NOmBjS0IMapB6xbJBUh1Nk06yKQRkotZmUJpCk660HdeqGK2MXGcWYYMthbgvXt2fM2FbpYY1p8muIZiyjO9_CuKvZpWs5KgvzRwwA/s1600/MP900443190.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSekV5LveYCG-phcL9CkBBn23qju92TpvbLM7x-NOmBjS0IMapB6xbJBUh1Nk06yKQRkotZmUJpCk660HdeqGK2MXGcWYYMthbgvXt2fM2FbpYY1p8muIZiyjO9_CuKvZpWs5KgvzRwwA/s200/MP900443190.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">When I state the
obvious, many will bemoan that I am relating the law of separate jurisdictions,
and guess what they will be correct.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
rebuttal I will direct their attention to the fact that there is a concept called
"stare decisis" and our court strive to prevent a conflict within the
"circuits" of the various United States District Courts.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Any one beg to differ?</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
In "Acting vs.
Reacting III" we saw that In <a href="http://www.houston-opinions.com/files/1stCoA-Riga-v-Comm-for-Lawyer-Discipline-by-Nuchia-recusal-motion-pending-order-void.mht">Riga
v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline</a> 224 S.W.3d 795 (2007), that court said:
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Discussion</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">The record establishes that Judge
Fowler was aware</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">that a second motion to
recuse was pending when he signed the March 1, 2006 order granting the plea to
the jurisdiction.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18a(c)
requires a judge who declines to recuse to forward the recusal motion to the
presiding judge</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> of the administrative
judicial region. </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">Judge Fowler did this</span><span style="font-style: italic;">.
However, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Rule 186a(c) further requires that the trial judge may make no
further orders and take no further action prior to a hearing on the forwarded
motion.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> The </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">only exception provided by the Rule</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> is </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">if the further order states good cause for ruling notwithstanding
the pending recusal motion</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. Here, the </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">order granting the plea</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> to the jurisdiction </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">does not refer in any way</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> to the pending recusal 798*798 motion, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">much less state good cause</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> for </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">why the order was signed when the recusal motion was pending</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. Accordingly, the </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">March 1, 2006 order is
"void"</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> because it was signed
in violation of Rule 18a.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Judge Noel L.
Hillman, being the most unethical, and exhibiting the most niggardly
application of law, has now set for in black-and-white, proof that he further
disregards creating conflict within the circuits, and he is determined to
protect Harrah's Hotel and Casino, Atlantic City, from liability pursuant to 42
U.S.C. §1983. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiSanedl0jly0jjD_0bF0PppHxOIDPaqINjAPSBhHX046Ruax_Fi0KtzDNETQTKRrxquKp1i1ZTFWcVUO9UD97QzxKd9Ooo8NZLu-_hgQuOMANPJC9114p2AHzdNFpak816d0CP-TwfUDw/s1600/MC900056211.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="153" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiSanedl0jly0jjD_0bF0PppHxOIDPaqINjAPSBhHX046Ruax_Fi0KtzDNETQTKRrxquKp1i1ZTFWcVUO9UD97QzxKd9Ooo8NZLu-_hgQuOMANPJC9114p2AHzdNFpak816d0CP-TwfUDw/s200/MC900056211.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">After he was clearly
given notice that he was be asked to recuse himself he does not forward the
motion to the chief judge, and he proceeds to write an order in a case that he
is being requested that he remove himself from.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
You were given the
facts as to the motion to recuse, and just above I shared with you the law that
gives further support to these facts. Now let me share with you the fact that
Judge Noel L. Hillman on March 28, 2012 did write another Order and Opinion in
civil action 08-cv-02407. And yes, he
does have the "HUBRIS" to publish this invalid Opinion for the world
to see at<a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12356297603056373038&q=Hickson+v+Marina+Associates&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31"> Hickson v. MARINA ASSOCIATES, Dist. Court, D.New Jersey 2012</a>.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
At this juncture
lets rest in knowing that this fact exists.
I've shared with you what the law says when a judge is asked to recuse
himself. I've told you that this judge
said that he would move on the Motion to Recuse on 2/21/2012. Yet, now as of this posting, some 65 day's
past due, I do not have that ruling to share with you. But…</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBC2A44lUekAgyAJP-VstjzaHpDZ31wFrOuHsM8kcEy2XDDou_eQcc4fmf1EA_f7y73nMQUvAnomB8jGRd2fXYcM2-8YQxWfPKupBgtctVApNCcKZM-u-uirT1mZCn4SNEDdcooH75fsA/s1600/MC900174349.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBC2A44lUekAgyAJP-VstjzaHpDZ31wFrOuHsM8kcEy2XDDou_eQcc4fmf1EA_f7y73nMQUvAnomB8jGRd2fXYcM2-8YQxWfPKupBgtctVApNCcKZM-u-uirT1mZCn4SNEDdcooH75fsA/s200/MC900174349.jpg" width="146" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Lastly, let me share
this with all that are not aware of what the law says in relation to a judges
handling of the courts business.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Those
versed and studied in the law will know that:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">ABA MODEL CODE OF JUDICIALCONDUCT, Canon 2</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
A
JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
COMPETENTLY,
AND DILIGENTLY.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">RULE 2.2
Impartiality and Fairness</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
A judge shall uphold and apply the law, and
shall perform all duties of judicial </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
office
fairly and impartially.</div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">RULE 2.3
Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
(A)
A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office, including </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
administrative
duties, without bias or prejudice.</div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">RULE 2.4
External Influences on Judicial Conduct</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
(A)
A judge shall not be swayed by public clamor or fear of criticism. </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
(B) A judge shall not permit family, social,
political, financial, or other </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
interests
or relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
judgment.
</div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
(C) A judge shall not convey or permit others
to convey the impression </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
that
any person or organization is in a position to influence the judge.</div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="circle">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">RULE 2.6
Ensuring the Right to Be Heard</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
(A)
A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.375in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
proceeding,
or that person’s lawyer, the right to be heard according to law.</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2tjgQzSLISDD1m0Y9jKDTwVDLF5vWb80oOy1-Qwhywg9g67bBIC698MOCdDuJEQPRHCrjctKZhMGOYq8xCDQ9FfGHdFq5PJONKCwkoHCvFflltNTX77BVz9HSojzd-PaSVw7dzA3GjOs/s1600/MC900281079.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2tjgQzSLISDD1m0Y9jKDTwVDLF5vWb80oOy1-Qwhywg9g67bBIC698MOCdDuJEQPRHCrjctKZhMGOYq8xCDQ9FfGHdFq5PJONKCwkoHCvFflltNTX77BVz9HSojzd-PaSVw7dzA3GjOs/s200/MC900281079.jpg" width="188" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .75in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Every person who has
a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person's lawyer, should have the
right to be heard according to law. Hmm? Judge Noel L. Hillman exhibits
behavior that clearly says these [FN] rules do not apply to his court. Well, I beg to differ Judge Hillman, and I
will proceed to show that you are sling more JSHIT against the walls of
justice. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
As always, I thank
each and every viewer, please tell a friend or two, and if my point is clear
send a message to these judges with a simple +1. Yes, a simple +1 adds up to tell these judges
and others that you know what's going on. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-73709809228707843292012-04-22T21:00:00.000-07:002012-04-30T01:01:30.283-07:00Acting vs. Reacting III<br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<b>Another One of
"Bush's Boy's" Reveal Bull-JSHIT</b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/N1byXYckUcQ?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Judge Craig Fowler
was appointed by </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://www2.dallasbar.org/judiciary/profiles.asp?item=28">Governor George Bush</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> after
winning an election for District Judge of the 255</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; vertical-align: super;">th</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> Judicial District of Dallas County.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">He took the bench on May 1, 1998. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Not to worry folks,
just another "good ole boy, never meaning no harm," nor intending to
be honorable as the facts reveal.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhR4CS7r2nUJc6GXl6LYn7KAcB6P35XW66a-AigfRZLXtORIlzMV0y5Eo9WS4GtlDnWiYzBdf0z1zt79Xzr6vThtQJ66UmK1WotkDOGjJv7oR_xX23XBKwLhylNB-W2iVRmRl-rz9HTaWw/s1600/MP900185020.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhR4CS7r2nUJc6GXl6LYn7KAcB6P35XW66a-AigfRZLXtORIlzMV0y5Eo9WS4GtlDnWiYzBdf0z1zt79Xzr6vThtQJ66UmK1WotkDOGjJv7oR_xX23XBKwLhylNB-W2iVRmRl-rz9HTaWw/s200/MP900185020.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">For those of you not
clear on why I refer to this judge as one of Bush's boy's, you'll have to see
"</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/cebull-1-hillman-195-bush-appointments.html">Cebull #1, Hillman #195 (Bush Appointments)</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">." Go ahead click it, I'll wait, you know I always do...</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Okay, since we're
all up to speed, let's proceed. I bring
your attention to another one of Bush's fine appointments because judge Fowler
was involved in a case that will show us exactly why Presidential appointment #195,
Noel L. Hillman, is reacting as shown in the two civil actions that I am
sharing with you in this blog. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjEmGwOLFWiPnHomQaCX8Jba6ws26bVuHwrhp8_mMPfBO9pmAaJ5ZAw4WWhA49E6ngiXjkvSQTMV-s37O94jli0QKOotXySRQyI_mRyXdNR2FJMBNi8bRt69Odn25akRJHwrUXGlAwpDc/s1600/MC910217263.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjEmGwOLFWiPnHomQaCX8Jba6ws26bVuHwrhp8_mMPfBO9pmAaJ5ZAw4WWhA49E6ngiXjkvSQTMV-s37O94jli0QKOotXySRQyI_mRyXdNR2FJMBNi8bRt69Odn25akRJHwrUXGlAwpDc/s200/MC910217263.jpg" width="150" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">This is going to
take a minute or two, so plan accordingly.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In </span><a href="http://www.houston-opinions.com/files/1stCoA-Riga-v-Comm-for-Lawyer-Discipline-by-Nuchia-recusal-motion-pending-order-void.mht" style="font-size: 11pt;">Riga
v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline</a><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> 224 S.W.3d 795 (2007), we find the
following:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Background</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">The </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Commission brought a disciplinary</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> action </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">against Riga</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, alleging that Riga violated provisions of the Texas
Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and that Riga assisted
Easton, his legal assistant, in the unauthorized practice of law. Pursuant to
Texas Rule of Disciplinary Procedure 3.02, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">the supreme court appointed</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> the Honorable </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">Craig Fowler</span><span style="font-style: italic;">,
judge of the 255th District Court of Dallas County, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">to preside over the disciplinary
action</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Easton filed a plea</span><span style="font-style: italic;">
in intervention, bringing claims </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">against Pamela Halliburton,
the Commission's lawyer, and Suzanne Ross, a member of one of the
State Bar's grievance committees.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Riga filed counterclaims</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> a</span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">gainst the State Bar of Texas, the Commission, and Halliburton,
seeking monetary 797*797 damages under title 42, United States Code,
section 1983 and sanctions under state law</span><span style="font-style: italic;">.
</span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Easton later filed a
motion to recuse Judge Fowler.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">The State Bar, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">the Commission, Halliburton, and Ross filed a plea</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">to the jurisdiction</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> in which
they argued (1) that Judge Fowler's appointment order did not authorize him to
preside over any parties or claims other than the disciplinary action brought
by the Commission against Riga and (2) that the district court
lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over parties and claims outside the
disciplinary action. </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Before
taking action on the motion to recuse, Judge Fowler granted the plea to the
jurisdiction</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> on </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">May 25, 2005</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. That order was not appealed.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">In </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">November 2005</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Judge Fowler referred Easton's
motion to recuse to the presiding judge</span><span style="font-style: italic;">
of the administrative judicial region, </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">who later denied the motion</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Acting in "an abundance of caution" after the denial of the
motion to recuse,</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> t</span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">he State Bar,
the Commission, Halliburton, and Ross </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">asked the district court to
reconsider i</span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">ts
plea to the jurisdiction.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Before the district court signed a
second order</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> on March 1, 2006 granting
the plea to the jurisdiction, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Riga and Easton on February 20, 2006 filed another
motion to recuse Judge Fowler.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> T</span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">he district court's March
1, 2006 order</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">does not mention the pending recusal
motion</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">but in a separate order on March 1, 2006</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, the </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">district court referred the recusal motion to the
presiding judge of the administrative judicial region</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. The </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">record does not reflect the ultimate disposition of the
recusal motion.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
I must get this off
my chest right away, did you notice how the court referred to the Judicial
Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT), as "acting in an abundance
of caution." The judge writing the opinion substantiates the existence of
(JSHIT) by that statement, huh? But
that's to be expected, we all act with an abundance of caution when treading
through a pasture replete with cow dung. (You know "BS")</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjHhU7ayfE8tHElb9t9iy5WW0Ko0219GLGdIkoMGEpa9q0nEYmIo_e_ASlk-KF_2I0hyPj1G8jwmH_P-50ut1z5uig5QM8ylC-Kw2cIbJna3chq0ytKOrbCGN9gKmUcoya2k0iuNPnO48/s1600/MP900227534.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjHhU7ayfE8tHElb9t9iy5WW0Ko0219GLGdIkoMGEpa9q0nEYmIo_e_ASlk-KF_2I0hyPj1G8jwmH_P-50ut1z5uig5QM8ylC-Kw2cIbJna3chq0ytKOrbCGN9gKmUcoya2k0iuNPnO48/s200/MP900227534.JPG" width="134" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">But here's where
Judge Fowler really fowls-up.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You see in
the very next section of the opinion the above judge show's us why his
colleague is not honorable, because he is caught red handed and this judge has
no way to tip-toe around this pile of you know what.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">224 S.W.3d 795 (2007), goes on to state:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Discussion</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">The record establishes that Judge
Fowler was aware</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">that a second motion to
recuse was pending when he signed the March 1, 2006 order granting the plea to
the jurisdiction.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18a(c)
requires a judge who declines to recuse to forward the recusal motion to the
presiding judge</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> of the administrative
judicial region. </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">Judge Fowler did this</span><span style="font-style: italic;">.
However, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Rule 186a(c) further requires that the trial judge may make no
further orders and take no further action prior to a hearing on the forwarded
motion.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> The </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">only exception provided by the Rule</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> is </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">if the further order states good cause for ruling notwithstanding
the pending recusal motion</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. Here, the </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">order granting the plea</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> to the jurisdiction </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">does not refer in any way</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> to the pending recusal 798*798 motion, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">much less state good cause</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> for </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">why the order was signed when the recusal motion was pending</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. Accordingly, the </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">March 1, 2006 order is
"void"</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> because it was signed
in violation of Rule 18a.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The judge writing
the opinion above tell us that according to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
judges refusing to recuse themselves must forward the recusal motion to the
presiding judge. But note that even this judge attempts to soften the blow by
saying that "Fowler did this." Yeah but after the fact. Oh,
that's just an example of that obscure language that Abramoff warned us about,
and now we see how the "Bush boy's" utilize this tactic. (Those not familiar with the Abramoff
"obscure language" revelation, go to "<a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/abramoff-should-be-flattered.html">Abramoff Should Be Flattered.</a>")</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
So, by now we all
should know why judge Noel L. Hillman's ruling on the motion that he and
Magistrate Karen M. Williams recuse themselves has not hit google scholar, nor
this writers mail box. The decisional
case law above further reveals the reaction that Judge Hillman will make, yes we can see what they got cooking. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiywxb69P4diTDHCsEAIHRfOSDRYBsXWutAMSd6l1jDGeJ2F7ll1N84RNuVx2EXK3M1Cv8_zNweOR5GpRsloQ66SgImlf0AxGO1yD00c4J0KxMnK9xh6tkKSB7K_-qGmp_IUkQuMN0A_gY/s1600/MC900090965.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiywxb69P4diTDHCsEAIHRfOSDRYBsXWutAMSd6l1jDGeJ2F7ll1N84RNuVx2EXK3M1Cv8_zNweOR5GpRsloQ66SgImlf0AxGO1yD00c4J0KxMnK9xh6tkKSB7K_-qGmp_IUkQuMN0A_gY/s200/MC900090965.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Those following this
blog early on know that I usually post every day, and lately I have fell-off,
why?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Because, as you can see I've been
busy doing my research to make sure that judge Noel L. Hillman's latest (JSHIT)
Order is void, as was the case in the matter before one of his boy's, Craig
Fowler.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes, you guessed it I have the
"BS" in hand and you don't want to miss this folks.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Please join me next
time when I let another documentary cat out of the bag.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEij5kFT0nf5Zqoga9KGpV3Uqru99rH_rB0A53tctSYwL1z3GLFJQLxzXnjU89rw0G2l8Ir19lw-cYULfCb2EqA7X4YfsI8MZmB0TgM_55VSqUbrrlgNXS0JwLhC-SIq0_Zv68Lo94BzrxI/s1600/MC910217341.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEij5kFT0nf5Zqoga9KGpV3Uqru99rH_rB0A53tctSYwL1z3GLFJQLxzXnjU89rw0G2l8Ir19lw-cYULfCb2EqA7X4YfsI8MZmB0TgM_55VSqUbrrlgNXS0JwLhC-SIq0_Zv68Lo94BzrxI/s1600/MC910217341.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Thank you for
viewing and please share at will, a lot of careers could be saved from turning
to the "Dark Side." We don't need more judges thinking that the
(JSHIT) is with them. You are the force, the people must strike back.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
O-B-1-Gaming Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-51871075512692265972012-04-18T02:40:00.000-07:002012-04-18T02:40:19.337-07:00Acting vs. Reacting II<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDwOU7YaAoU1yU5pH6QmRQulDVk9H_ot0TDdPrp-v6NTeI3NINVQwXOx1h40jiC2wjwTudw8XQ1qwJ0doRrMdDiSN-iM0U4sfF2vuiQDbCnoZieM3fUM-4-_gCSFzoIsKzkVhA2iXL-Gs/s1600/MC900104988.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="199" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDwOU7YaAoU1yU5pH6QmRQulDVk9H_ot0TDdPrp-v6NTeI3NINVQwXOx1h40jiC2wjwTudw8XQ1qwJ0doRrMdDiSN-iM0U4sfF2vuiQDbCnoZieM3fUM-4-_gCSFzoIsKzkVhA2iXL-Gs/s200/MC900104988.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Thank you for
joining in my posts on Acting vs. Reacting.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This is the second post in the series.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Within the first article "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/04/acting-vs-reacting.html">Acting vs.Reacting</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">" I shared the definitions of the terms: (1) act, (2)
react, (3) reaction, and (4) acting.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If you are just
joining us on this topic please click the preceding link, so that you will
understand the context that these terms are used throughout this discussion of
Acting vs. Reacting. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsu489vmcgjQBJjdX9p0IV8Tj9oM5l_avnvVSMjZQQoYJBAXHY4cU1UtFq-BblKORCugnfhvXF6X_DkO6uwyB4nS0mLK8Uwxqq8b2xktg9PFJsyjJ60eHzSzchxB3WXWseZKw_FB3mx3E/s1600/MP900289753.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsu489vmcgjQBJjdX9p0IV8Tj9oM5l_avnvVSMjZQQoYJBAXHY4cU1UtFq-BblKORCugnfhvXF6X_DkO6uwyB4nS0mLK8Uwxqq8b2xktg9PFJsyjJ60eHzSzchxB3WXWseZKw_FB3mx3E/s200/MP900289753.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">In this article I
submit that Judges Noel L. Hillman, Karen M. Williams, Christopher C. Mauro and
DAG, Kathleen M. Bartus are pretending to be moral judicial officer, when the
facts are to the contrary.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
For our Courts to
serve those within its jurisdiction, all judicial officers of that court should
take action (MOVE), conduct themselves (BEHAVE), and perform the specific
function of the due administration of justice (SERVE), in accordance with the
law. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
When the judicial
officers of a court comply with the above, the public it serves can have
confidence in said court. If a judicial
officer is found to "act" contrary to the above, he or she is not
upholding their oath to uphold the highest law of the United States of America,
the Constitution of the United States of America. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJAFGQLv8Uh_gUFooXQcb8nZc5aK2pF6cF0sChEtKBGYkPNLrvF-0J9z0o5djGLFcd8wcVSJx3qkKAMznVmvhDfr7sP-m4xJ6M7t6TT7BAygINpKU66LIEi8JvJFGrbExNvxJlPorjkec/s1600/MP900410154.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJAFGQLv8Uh_gUFooXQcb8nZc5aK2pF6cF0sChEtKBGYkPNLrvF-0J9z0o5djGLFcd8wcVSJx3qkKAMznVmvhDfr7sP-m4xJ6M7t6TT7BAygINpKU66LIEi8JvJFGrbExNvxJlPorjkec/s200/MP900410154.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Those familiar with
this blog know that I have filed a motion seeking the recusal of judges Noel L.
Hillman and Karen M. Williams.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">For those
that aren't aware of this fact, or forgot it, you can review this fact at:
"</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/absolute-immunity-via-recusal.html">Absolute Immunity via Recusal</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Judge Noel L.
Hillman, wanting to present the appearance that he is "just," did
issue a hearing date of February 21, 2012, to render a decision on the motion
seeking his recusal. The physical
evidence supports this act of Hillman's.
But, what is hidden is the fact that said act was nothing but Hillman's
"reaction" to conceal his perfidy to uphold his oath to uphold the
Constitution of the United States of America. (I guess such behavior is to be
expected from one following in the footsteps of one of his former defendants.
See "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/abramoff-should-be-flattered.html">Abramoff Should Be Flattered</a></span>.")</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiSaqs5zGbodyBAIHsEtBl0IQUAh4DkUKx2Owg6kwk7M8O5HYUW2GBw2fP0ojj0UZJRFP-dJXA3ehRl-NXeke21Rbn_00opKfvMH3SLheFv2MAXvN9vuJCMUvQt_VyXhWT4bkix62-GGkQ/s1600/MM900283996.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiSaqs5zGbodyBAIHsEtBl0IQUAh4DkUKx2Owg6kwk7M8O5HYUW2GBw2fP0ojj0UZJRFP-dJXA3ehRl-NXeke21Rbn_00opKfvMH3SLheFv2MAXvN9vuJCMUvQt_VyXhWT4bkix62-GGkQ/s1600/MM900283996.GIF" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">The act of setting
the date of Feb. 21, 2012 was made 33 minutes after the motion was filed.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">How many lawyers out there can say that they
normally receive such a speedy response from a judge. (I'll wait...)</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Not to many huh? You'd have to be standing in
front of the judge to get a response that quick, even then, you'll have to pray
he doesn't call a recess, or it's not to close to lunch.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If judge Hillman
writes that he will "take action (MOVE)" on 2/21/2012, why is it that
as of April 17, 2012, there is no physical evidence that he has moved on this
motion? Do you agree that justice delayed
is justice denied? Well it was written
that the motion to recuse would be moved upon on 2/21/2012. Yes, that's what was written and it's not
what was done. Hence, Noel L. Hillman was acting. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtjcSnFbGOU5D7I3y9k9HXoEy7xSh1hW4sOGQzOO3NwkFHk0yrZsUGOC5B-qPtWQXgXqY0k9CiWTSAiydxYpp9SX-RF49fjV5bxAwFflCWLCMPyEk19MpgL9l5-lb4GqzpjJdAAZg_iJA/s1600/MP900321204.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtjcSnFbGOU5D7I3y9k9HXoEy7xSh1hW4sOGQzOO3NwkFHk0yrZsUGOC5B-qPtWQXgXqY0k9CiWTSAiydxYpp9SX-RF49fjV5bxAwFflCWLCMPyEk19MpgL9l5-lb4GqzpjJdAAZg_iJA/s200/MP900321204.JPG" width="142" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">He was presented
with the stimulus, and 54 days after the purported hearing date there is no
response. Hmm?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">But wait, the plot
thickens, or should I say the (JSHIT) deepens. I will reveal further facts that
show this judges lack of integrity.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Said
lack of integrity going beyond his proselytization of Magistrate Judge Karen M.
Williams. (See </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/proselytization-of-kmw.html">Proselytization of KMW</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">)</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtmmxtLKIT4PgHSgS0N8ylDUcC-YxmvYIHQ0tjZ_YuTA84KHpAEM3aXDWAUfusSoryLL2YQ5o4ZwIkPu79QZJFIxl-CAbbVerlRLCjafmjKne7YzUk0uJwyIWWhZQUahMVaVbUXR1GfNQ/s1600/MM900283994.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtmmxtLKIT4PgHSgS0N8ylDUcC-YxmvYIHQ0tjZ_YuTA84KHpAEM3aXDWAUfusSoryLL2YQ5o4ZwIkPu79QZJFIxl-CAbbVerlRLCjafmjKne7YzUk0uJwyIWWhZQUahMVaVbUXR1GfNQ/s1600/MM900283994.GIF" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Without an answer to
the motion to recuse himself, judge Noel L. Hillman is pretending to serve as a
U.S. District Judge, when in fact he is not doing so, and he is not just running a little behind on conducting the business of the Court. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Do you agree?</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank you for
viewing, and please join me for the next post. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Gaming Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-49694446271043869772012-04-16T23:21:00.000-07:002012-04-16T23:21:28.962-07:00Acting vs. Reacting<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9sdPq2UPdvACxusDlZl7n-jF_wp1Oy0TfGEd1rvUflSInfr1nvrAfCqFLxMbhdCMIjZMKj2_aBK_stA6UurwLVBckSgzzghHWOM-j9tek7BR3FAKuXMSnUphZf_yobpfXvuAHfk37-a0/s1600/MC900442022.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="165" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9sdPq2UPdvACxusDlZl7n-jF_wp1Oy0TfGEd1rvUflSInfr1nvrAfCqFLxMbhdCMIjZMKj2_aBK_stA6UurwLVBckSgzzghHWOM-j9tek7BR3FAKuXMSnUphZf_yobpfXvuAHfk37-a0/s200/MC900442022.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hello out there in
Blogger Ville. The regular viewers of this blog have already figured out that I
am in the process of acting upon my adversaries reactions to the stimulus that
I set before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Some of the lawyers
out there are going: "what the hell?"
For all of the non-lawyer types like myself, they are saying that
because they don't call complaints and motion papers stimuli. But as I will set
forth below, that's what they (complaints and motions before the court) amount
too. Let's see how by examining my basis
in fact and law, then as you already know, you can be the judge. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRcVCSlMedZgyOInvUqvA0-uLh71jENen70Ry5RVwl8XZhGbdhNn3Oxlhrpp4WUqyDstsBDbKrMd4kMowYaUPv1moTFwA-QfznQWOHFmng8zWRxWSqV7E_F9sZTW8b1kUi9y851p0SLrk/s1600/MC900056210.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="183" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRcVCSlMedZgyOInvUqvA0-uLh71jENen70Ry5RVwl8XZhGbdhNn3Oxlhrpp4WUqyDstsBDbKrMd4kMowYaUPv1moTFwA-QfznQWOHFmng8zWRxWSqV7E_F9sZTW8b1kUi9y851p0SLrk/s200/MC900056210.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">To keep this post as
simple as possible lets look at the </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Merriam-Webster's
11th Collegiate</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Dictionary's</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">definition
of the following:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; font-weight: bold;">Act-</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;"> 2: to take action: Move 3: to conduct
oneself: Behave 4: to perform a specific function: Serve.</span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; font-weight: bold;">React-</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;"> 1: to exert a reciprocal or
counteracting force or influence 2: to change in response to a stimulus.</span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; font-weight: bold;">Reaction-</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;"> 1a: the act or process or an
instance of reacting b: resistance or opposition to a force, influence or
movement;</span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
You know what folks,
this post is going to need several parts to make this point clear. As I am writing this I can see it coming,
because I set out writing this post for you to show you how they (the
"liars for hire" and judges Hillman and Williams) want me to react to
their Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT). </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlNJ9jBX-KSmhtlMMjFBWTMyUyudzchWX5fm4W-UCrh1GOoEbYXVoNDSHz_WtVKCNKYvaaGtv9h86B9wRsuq7ubHBgAP5gQ3f64gumCrKdForo1vW_YrV0-KV7AdUlNf_wv3Iq4rJ74Sw/s1600/MC900281333_jpg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlNJ9jBX-KSmhtlMMjFBWTMyUyudzchWX5fm4W-UCrh1GOoEbYXVoNDSHz_WtVKCNKYvaaGtv9h86B9wRsuq7ubHBgAP5gQ3f64gumCrKdForo1vW_YrV0-KV7AdUlNf_wv3Iq4rJ74Sw/s200/MC900281333_jpg.jpg" width="150" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">So, I'll tell you
what, look at the definition above once more.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No, read each on again, and before proceeding make sure you understand
these basic terms.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Go ahead I'll wait, but hurry up before the (JSHIT) starts rolling back downhill. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Okay, everybody with
me? You be the judge now, because I will
show you in the forth coming posts that "the liars for hire," judges
Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams are "acting." Not as defined above but as "<span style="vertical-align: super;">2</span>act" is defined within the same
dictionary which holds: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; vertical-align: super;">2</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;">act- 1a: to perform on the stage b: to behave
as if performing on the stage: PRETEND</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTbsUdTX54iZJrfUOSuag1057VGD4OxuW0_3J4HqnawAsO8BuwLISS686gIME1998QbZRdMCqNSWuSsCBgo4JCHsGI4qRRUGXFtWscV8gUdrre9U__YS-tM-8CZkhJ8GUE1yOhbez1BwU/s1600/MP900443078.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="132" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTbsUdTX54iZJrfUOSuag1057VGD4OxuW0_3J4HqnawAsO8BuwLISS686gIME1998QbZRdMCqNSWuSsCBgo4JCHsGI4qRRUGXFtWscV8gUdrre9U__YS-tM-8CZkhJ8GUE1yOhbez1BwU/s200/MP900443078.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes they are pretending to administer
"justice" on their stage, which just so happens to be our United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I say we reclaim this venue folks.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That's what this blog is all about.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That Court is there for you and I to seek
redress, but when we bop or ass in there alone the corrupt judicial officers
take offense and try to provoke us into acting out of frustration in our
inability to get justice.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If you don't think
so, you know I have a basis in fact for you to ponder. This is the reaction of
a pro se litigant that also fell prey to (JSHIT). I've chose to take a
different route, with you help and support of course. So, without further delay
here below is an example of how Judge Noel L. Hillman and Karen M. Williams
want me to react. I think their reasons for wanting said reaction from me
should be apparent from the video below. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/LeogvOmtW8Y?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now you can see why
I constantly thank you for your views and support.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Please continue to share this cause with your
friends and colleagues, so that this wart upon the court can be eviscerated.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Acting vs. Reacting II" on the
way.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank you, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Gaming Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-18647027275265184492012-04-04T02:09:00.000-07:002012-04-04T02:09:45.549-07:00Day 43 and Still No Response<br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The clock is ticking
but I'm not one to stand around and wait. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjadTvB0n-G9pWnfoc1oDAT5nRGlsKIJVhHdUo6-wJuqjEIamRGNeLjBZsquKK87qWOMQ2V4_cHQjg9lz38dGXDIIwVn0tIk5wvA5zrwrSUn1pEyFiX86xl7WZTIiRZzx_gIRRjk74ejcE/s1600/MP900442482.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjadTvB0n-G9pWnfoc1oDAT5nRGlsKIJVhHdUo6-wJuqjEIamRGNeLjBZsquKK87qWOMQ2V4_cHQjg9lz38dGXDIIwVn0tIk5wvA5zrwrSUn1pEyFiX86xl7WZTIiRZzx_gIRRjk74ejcE/s200/MP900442482.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Today Wednesday,
April 4, 2012, marks the 43</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; vertical-align: super;">rd</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> day in
which United States District Judge Noel L. Hillman has not moved upon a motion
that he and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams recuse themselves from civil
actions 11-cv-06304 and 08-cv-02407 NLH-KMW.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Not more than two
days after filing the motion for recusal, I shared with you the viewers of this
blog, within "Absolute Immunity via Recusal" the following:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">On or before February 21, 2012, U.S.D.J. Noel L.
Hillman and U.S.M.J. Karen M. Williams may retain their "Absolute
Immunity" by recusing themselves from civil actions 11-cv-06304 and
08-cv-02407, which are before the United States District Court for the District
of New Jersey, Camden vicinage. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Earl Hickson and Markland Grant have filed a ten page
"</span><span style="color: red; font-style: italic;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hIWRl5vDvXF_JjDpFa7Wxw0PiPuh9FDtDprMydmWDO8/edit">28 U.S.C.A. § 1746 Declaration of Bias or Prejudice and Motion for Recusal of U.S.D.J. Noel L.Hillman</a></span><span style="font-style: italic;"> and U.S.M.J. Karen M.
Williams. (</span><span style="color: red; font-style: italic;"><a href="http://prosehq.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-is-28-uscs-1746.html">What is 28 USCA § 1746</a></span><span style="font-style: italic;">) Within 33
minutes of receiving the motion, amazingly the court was able to docket a
hearing date of 2/21/2012. The average person would be impressed and say
"wow what an efficient and speedy bunch of judicial officer." Not! </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgbLAloXbfbjTtwqwYMGWacRLZn6DcRDTY3wtj_yAXrDnLQIPJo6ZxpYxJbHHoMWu9V12fTHNq8D1tvnevnlqU_xkWJMlBuEu3Lzr2YlXALxqB0Ak6xGXbIlvL21lLMG6kCVYb4KsSOS_A/s1600/MC910217262.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgbLAloXbfbjTtwqwYMGWacRLZn6DcRDTY3wtj_yAXrDnLQIPJo6ZxpYxJbHHoMWu9V12fTHNq8D1tvnevnlqU_xkWJMlBuEu3Lzr2YlXALxqB0Ak6xGXbIlvL21lLMG6kCVYb4KsSOS_A/s200/MC910217262.jpg" width="194" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Noel L. Hillman can
sure dig some huge holes for himself.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Former president Bush is not in office to send him packing to another
state this time, as was the case when he was prosecuting Mr. Abramoff, and Bush
gave him his present judgeship to quell that debacle. (See "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/archives-opens-eyes.html">Archives Opens the Eyes</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">")</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Having been denied
justice for some 43 days now by this unethical band of judicial officer's I'm
in a bit of a quandary. Do I thank my lucky stars that I was only kidnapped and
falsely imprisoned for ten days, or do I implement all that's available to me
to acquire redress? </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiqchoIyyzAjpAWWFvQWuUsucKCVs2gGOzwWYZmUOZ1nFrZLYrUKbj8oyy3X0WUVdlBjTCrxk5GX_91Gl-pz7PBzNKX3PcMmSj8StwzNd_KY32fQXzDgy1O9n3tMVONyzciEnW5UjC8i8/s1600/MC900048774.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiqchoIyyzAjpAWWFvQWuUsucKCVs2gGOzwWYZmUOZ1nFrZLYrUKbj8oyy3X0WUVdlBjTCrxk5GX_91Gl-pz7PBzNKX3PcMmSj8StwzNd_KY32fQXzDgy1O9n3tMVONyzciEnW5UjC8i8/s200/MC900048774.jpg" width="197" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I know Hillman is
beyond pissed off, thank God I'm not a lawyer, and I don't to put food on the
table by appearing in his court.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In my
opinion that fear of loosing her source of income, and or status with the
"good ole boys and girls" caused judge Karen M. Williams to yield to
the proselytization as discussed within, "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/proselytization-of-kmw.html">Proselytization of KMW</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
By now you all know
that I am working on getting justice, even if the whole court has to turn
itself in, but before that happens I must share the details and doing's of the
two "liars for hire." </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
You won't believe
it, but one is a Deputy Attorney General for the State of New Jersey and the
other is a partner in a New York law firm located within the Empire State
Building. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
I'm working on those
post's for you plus I have some other projects to share, so I hope you continue
to join me here at this blog. Please
continue to spread the word by sharing this site with your friends and associates. (Check out my updated profile photo and
description for a clue as to what's in store.)</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-12819196759839158952012-03-29T02:01:00.000-07:002012-03-29T02:01:32.340-07:00Alternative View To A Plea, (part II)<br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Please pardon the
interruption of "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/basis-in-fact-im-not-biased-you.html">Basis In Fact, I'm Not Biased,You</a></span>," but I thought it was important to share with you the
existence of the Implicit Association Test" or (IAT). If you missed the
post or you're just joining us you can click the link to catch up to speed. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeo-qYBRxhzM9DPWk0SAJmNOR95NxXMggN70lNLVDODpXovuMswOtIwXSdLVdVC1zoyDgn5TmG0Ioo6piHVmVb5w1wrml88wHxlFMi6agXXLtGVQLmqLESAmcRhnUvWvCVMhsjz_7sI2M/s1600/MC900237922.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="173" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeo-qYBRxhzM9DPWk0SAJmNOR95NxXMggN70lNLVDODpXovuMswOtIwXSdLVdVC1zoyDgn5TmG0Ioo6piHVmVb5w1wrml88wHxlFMi6agXXLtGVQLmqLESAmcRhnUvWvCVMhsjz_7sI2M/s200/MC900237922.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">When we closed the
first part of this topic we had discussed what a demand was, and with that
taken care of we can now turn to a plea vs. a prayer.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I shared with you that a plea has several
definitions. A plea is defined as: 1. a legal suit or action, 2. an allegation
made by a party in support of a cause; as (a) an allegation of fact (b) (1): a
defendants answer to a plaintiff's declaration in common-law practice (2) an
accused person's answer to a charge or indictment in criminal practice (c)</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">a plea of guilty to an indictment.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The judicial system
within the United States of America, especially the criminal side, emphasizes
the definition of "a plea of guilty to an indictment." Why? Aren't we all innocent until proven guilty? Yes that's true, in a criminal matter we are
presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-QQBCmn-EjtzKzi9V2kHDhEn9tCiNj_IXDByuhiirhUq4CP6U5PNf1S8JTPkVMGFtkMc_zM-rlCYJx_YGMDTo9qJf5GBWzc5WHG_Lnd-JLAV3NN_Q8DifUpBcZs3PXgQsS8F3JxeDfbE/s1600/MC900231083.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="136" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-QQBCmn-EjtzKzi9V2kHDhEn9tCiNj_IXDByuhiirhUq4CP6U5PNf1S8JTPkVMGFtkMc_zM-rlCYJx_YGMDTo9qJf5GBWzc5WHG_Lnd-JLAV3NN_Q8DifUpBcZs3PXgQsS8F3JxeDfbE/s200/MC900231083.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">But, there in lies
the catch.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Many may have noticed the
litigation in America has become very expensive, and the criminal justice
system has been converted into a system of settlements and compromises to
defray expenses. So what ends up happening is that most cases result in the
plea bargain. In this process a defendant says that he or she is guilty of some
charge, which is usually a lesser charge than he or she would face if they went
to trial.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">But what happens if the person
is innocent or the prosecution lacks evidence to prove guilt and the matter is
dismissed?</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If a matter is
dismissed according to the legal encyclopedia Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.)
Vol. 54 Section 45 Termination by dismissal or discharge in criminal
prosecution:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">C.J.S. Vol. 54 Section 45
Termination by dismissal or discharge in criminal prosecution</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Where the dismissal of criminal charges reflects on
the merits of the underlying action it constitutes a favorable termination
sufficient to support an action for malicious prosecution.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">In a malicious prosecution action the plaintiff must
establish, among other things that the underlying criminal proceeding was
terminated in his or her favor, which is satisfied when the final disposition
involves the merits and indicates innocence on the part of the accused. Accordingly, a malicious prosecution action
cannot be predicated on underlying criminal proceeding which were terminated in
a manner not indicative of the accuser’s innocence. However, there is other authority that does
not distinguish between dismissals consistent with the innocence of the accused
and dismissal on the basis of a procedural or technical defect.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">The dismissal of criminal charges may constitute a
favorable termination even though future criminal proceedings may be brought
against the accused on the same charge, if the prosecutor must institute new
proceedings in order to further prosecute the case. A favorable termination has been held to
exist where dismissal is due to a formal abandonment of proceedings by a public
prosecutor, the complaining witness’s refusal to testify, a lack or
insufficiency of evidence necessary for conviction, a lack of a speedy trial,
or a prior grant of immunity.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Because of the
above, a plea of guilty causes a waiver of the presumption of innocence until
proven guilty, and the pleader further waives the right to a trial wherein his
or her guilt would have had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Hence the judge must ask if the pleader
understands the rights he or she is giving up, and that said waiver is knowing
and not coerced. Why, because the conviction and sentencing is to follow. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUIhL7u7Y8mXw2C2PAaUBHGWXJDiWOHVVeqA8vJOBj73SlC2eYU4dn8hWxepFZVSghBUXKYSBCXsHD6aRvabG_WXo-ne0Bntk3Im09qtfiUi0zawFkRF6z8kc21DkTpaagT0M3bDdgj78/s1600/MC900280720.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUIhL7u7Y8mXw2C2PAaUBHGWXJDiWOHVVeqA8vJOBj73SlC2eYU4dn8hWxepFZVSghBUXKYSBCXsHD6aRvabG_WXo-ne0Bntk3Im09qtfiUi0zawFkRF6z8kc21DkTpaagT0M3bDdgj78/s200/MC900280720.jpg" width="158" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">And here is the
whole point people, as long as there is a conviction there can be no claim of
false arrest, malicious prosecution, or false imprisonment.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">A conviction also negates any claim of
violation of a persons civil and constitutional rights. The short version is,
"as long as there is some form of conviction, those accused cannot come
back and sue those that initiated the prosecution in the first place.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
A classic example of
this situation is contained within Prinz v. Greate Bay Casino Corp.,<a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12559541276556850976&q=Prinz+v+Greate+bay&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31"> <span style="color: red;">705 F. 2d 692</span> </a>- Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1983.
I'll link you to the case but in a nutshell, Mr. Prinz was arrested by a
casino, sent to the Municipal Court in Atlantic City, NJ. Where he was advised by a public defender to plead
guilty and all he would have to do is pay a fine and be done, so he did that.
He then filed a lawsuit for false arrest and won, but this verdict was reversed
due to his prior guilty plea as evidenced within the first paragraph of the
case that states:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Greate Bay Hotel and Casino, Inc. (Greate Bay)
appeals from a final judgment of $105,000 in favor of David Prinz in his suit
for false imprisonment and assault and battery, and from an order denying its
motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. The
judgment was entered on a jury verdict on special verdict interrogatories,
which found Greate Bay liable for assault and battery and false imprisonment
and awarded $5,000 in compensatory and $100,000 in punitive damages. We hold that
the trial court erred in denying Greate Bay's motion for a new trial, and we
remand for that purpose.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
But guess what folks
Mr. Prinz was not guilty of any crime, he just fell for some well planned
advice from one of the casinos band, just like all those you are hearing about
throughout this blog. Judge Noel L.
Hillman has been made aware of this case law and has done all within his power
the protect the New Jersey Casino industry from liability from violating their
patrons civil and constitutional rights, as this lone pro se litigant has
uncovered. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNMLtPfanNk6Ru0q5CsO2Cwb-4GoAquz4A_kCx9oVtbz-aR6lZeNqG6RT7s28fhctNzjSzpE4emGZu49XftVhQoOqejfmKUtT6XTlfO3FPjsbnZZbHZ5U72pi35X1tTYlSxvTKVugr-i4/s1600/MC900057282.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNMLtPfanNk6Ru0q5CsO2Cwb-4GoAquz4A_kCx9oVtbz-aR6lZeNqG6RT7s28fhctNzjSzpE4emGZu49XftVhQoOqejfmKUtT6XTlfO3FPjsbnZZbHZ5U72pi35X1tTYlSxvTKVugr-i4/s200/MC900057282.jpg" width="172" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">So as we can see
unless you educate yourself about the law, "prayer" will never enter
the equation, because you won't stand a prayer when judicial officers are bent
of mind upon securing a conviction by all means necessary. You will not have a prayer
if you don't learn what rights you give up by just pleading guilty, paying a
fine or taking some other sweet deal that will surly not be designed with you
in mind, but the protection of eliminating a future lawsuit.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-55092649394640144602012-03-27T23:23:00.000-07:002012-03-27T23:23:40.791-07:00Basis In Fact, I'm Not Biased, You?<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidbBC-XN2NiDpv3xp9pcv6NYCqTvzn3aXW81MpxNOGxzY3zlBbgg6pFKl03ZXwBF6448Rhai1yN03lzndoZsOIl4-5NdWCWFY3f92BImEcFmyETO3eiKon-o8_XanXnBUslRWoPUsPJco/s1600/MC900078724.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="117" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidbBC-XN2NiDpv3xp9pcv6NYCqTvzn3aXW81MpxNOGxzY3zlBbgg6pFKl03ZXwBF6448Rhai1yN03lzndoZsOIl4-5NdWCWFY3f92BImEcFmyETO3eiKon-o8_XanXnBUslRWoPUsPJco/s200/MC900078724.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle will post the follow-up to "Alternative View To A Plea" after
sharing this very interesting information.
This interruption has occurred due to my discovery of the "Implicit
Association Test" or (IAT). </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The tests are the
products of "Project Implicit. They
described themselves on their website as
: "<span style="font-style: italic;">Project Implicit is a non-profit
organization and international collaborative network of researchers
investigating implicit social cognition - thoughts and feelings outside of
conscious awareness and control. Project Implicit is the product of a team of scientists
whose research produced new ways of understanding attitudes, stereotypes and
other hidden biases that influence perception, judgment, and action.</span>"</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHTvEkP8hnsQkDLZkFa7ZPzYEhx89B07zYu4QtsKByG6eUGSV5de3SCx9FQAJ8o8xvzIjcWXB_9xk1ckm0pVSqrA-yKuawqdA6XIRnBLuxMJg5-KPwiBMUNcMX9I_zjZf1CAUQtdco_p4/s1600/MP900399426.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHTvEkP8hnsQkDLZkFa7ZPzYEhx89B07zYu4QtsKByG6eUGSV5de3SCx9FQAJ8o8xvzIjcWXB_9xk1ckm0pVSqrA-yKuawqdA6XIRnBLuxMJg5-KPwiBMUNcMX9I_zjZf1CAUQtdco_p4/s200/MP900399426.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I am devoting this
post to this topic because it lends it self to the issues of this blog and it
further confirmed my own notions of self. Hmm?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">How many of you out there have asked your selves, am I biased towards people
of different ethnic backgrounds?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">As a
African American I have asked myself this question, and at times, I must admit
that I have found myself having to give myself a gut check.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If asked, are you
biased, I would confidently respond, No!
Guess what? Now I can share with you that my IAT test on
"Race" said: "<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Your
data suggest little to no automatic preference between European American and
African American</span>." So, no
one out there can accuse me of "Judge Noel L. Hillman Bashing"
because he's white and I'm black. The
test results further hold that I have no proclivity to prefer Magistrate Judge
Karen L. Williams, because her and I share the same skin tone. [This fact was
first born-out within the 5¶ of "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2011/12/guiding-hand.html">A Guiding Hand</a></span>."]</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5d5HHpk5_l6MnJx7e5zBJXCqjwtM8_kcAYshWXECprIWa_FpA_xSs4wxmNVO1yRHP65QFEGZfOEJ2wOu6-Kc_eDafZoZH_bIFN9acsJZM7O0zu5OX3myNntZnyarrTtMh20R-vnvU3cY/s1600/MP900438625.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5d5HHpk5_l6MnJx7e5zBJXCqjwtM8_kcAYshWXECprIWa_FpA_xSs4wxmNVO1yRHP65QFEGZfOEJ2wOu6-Kc_eDafZoZH_bIFN9acsJZM7O0zu5OX3myNntZnyarrTtMh20R-vnvU3cY/s200/MP900438625.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">We are all aware of
the Trayvon Martin case in Florida, I've discussed it within "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/do-tell-do-tell-inform-vs-insinuate.html">Do Tell-Do Tell, Inform vs. Insinuate.</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hence, I've surmised that this would be a
good moment for us all to come to grips with any bias' we may harbor.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I for one am glad that my test results
suggest that I am not biased.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I do
detest injustice, corruption, and the lack of courage to admit that one is
wrong, as exhibited by the band of judicial officers exposed by the facts and
laws applicable within my civil actions before the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey, and revealed on this blog.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7VLEZ_3ZsFkFnkLWD_4CL4LoUToljiFadA6lDHNTj5MCv3PTZpLKxF97C7l41PtnYkKdr_VuOurJIT_ygwEVj0oUvMfVQ2PiOG-MOqS-4yKb962lGwojHlxRF4P8JKilkttem8s5szz4/s1600/MP900439390.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7VLEZ_3ZsFkFnkLWD_4CL4LoUToljiFadA6lDHNTj5MCv3PTZpLKxF97C7l41PtnYkKdr_VuOurJIT_ygwEVj0oUvMfVQ2PiOG-MOqS-4yKb962lGwojHlxRF4P8JKilkttem8s5szz4/s200/MP900439390.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now I will share
with you, my viewers, that Project Implicit has put together some very
eye-opening tests and studies.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You can
go to their site and participate in their studies and test your selves and get
the results from their IAT tests on, Gender, Disability, Weapons, Race,
Skin-Tone, Weight, Religion, Age, Sexuality and more.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Click here to go to "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://www.projectimplicit.net/index.html">Project Implicit</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">." To go straight to
demonstration tests</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">go to "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/">Implicit Association Test</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">" and click
demonstration and follow the instructions. Share this with a friend or two or
three, guess what?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">We will all benefit
and come together as a nation.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Good Luck, and
Thanks for viewing,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-63007492902513849482012-03-27T03:31:00.000-07:002012-03-27T03:31:15.809-07:00Alternative View To A Plea<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRg4-CQeXBIk7lbETntv7faiQAA4Kdyt995xTfd8tF-GuQ98eKA0TqrBPqZHM8oSXUl969CKng9v-qAHCT0qyuZZg8A0Yf5X38I7U2oR_GZFWqOvuTT59Poz20QfqLzqkTsdyeIAHtoTw/s1600/MC900048445.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRg4-CQeXBIk7lbETntv7faiQAA4Kdyt995xTfd8tF-GuQ98eKA0TqrBPqZHM8oSXUl969CKng9v-qAHCT0qyuZZg8A0Yf5X38I7U2oR_GZFWqOvuTT59Poz20QfqLzqkTsdyeIAHtoTw/s200/MC900048445.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">We've all heard the
chat of "No Justice, No Peace!"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Ask yourselves this question: why is it that when I hear this chant it
usually come in the form of a demand?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">People rarely come together to "plea" for justice.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yet, only God knows the number of daily
prayer's for the same, justice that is.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
It would appear to
this writer that there are several means for those wishing for justice. Let's take a look at just three of them here.
The plea, prayer and demand for justice. If we examined these three alphabetically
we would have to look at the demand, plea, and then the prayer for justice. We
all may have different interpretations of the various forms of a call for
justice, but lets stick to the three I've set forth. By the mere mention of a "call for
justice" I would be adding another means of obtaining this concept and
thereby expand the length of this post. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/book.pl?c11.htm&1"><span style="color: red;">Merriam Webster's 11</span><span style="color: red; vertical-align: super;">th</span><span style="color: red;"> Collegiate Dictionary</span></a>
defines as follows:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Demand-</span> 1a: an act of demanding or asking
especially with authority, b: something claimed as due.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Plea-</span> 1.
a legal suit or action, 2. an allegation made by a party in support of a cause;
as (a) an allegation of fact (b) (1): a defendants answer to a plaintiff's
declaration in common-law practice (2) an accused person's answer to a charge
or indictment in criminal practice (c) a
plea of guilty to an indictment 3.
something offered by way of excuse or justification. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Prayer-</span>
1a(1): an address (as a petition) to God or a god in word or thought
(2): a set order of words used in praying b: an earnest request or wish.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Surely I am not the
only one that can see that the "demand" as the dictionary says is
made with authority. When there is a gathering I would presume that said
gathering is relying upon the strength of their numbers as one show of their
authority. Contrary to what those in power would have us believe, there is
authority for those standing alone in their demand. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipzjaJFp5E_CpQnyL5poyi5n_PZPx7MotUtW5ss6vxb9eyuv9pzhCbxlI9DFwvRvMTyOB49UWU8M_aI_9js463hpmwKb6sA7P-1XhoVfYKMmWEmzLf5xRNCnDsKceJEK7lRLy36MG5IKs/s1600/MC900174349.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipzjaJFp5E_CpQnyL5poyi5n_PZPx7MotUtW5ss6vxb9eyuv9pzhCbxlI9DFwvRvMTyOB49UWU8M_aI_9js463hpmwKb6sA7P-1XhoVfYKMmWEmzLf5xRNCnDsKceJEK7lRLy36MG5IKs/s200/MC900174349.jpg" width="146" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes, one standing
alone demanding justice does carry the authority of claiming what he or she
claims is due to him or her.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In the
United States of America we can look to our Constitution for the rights that
all citizens, and those within the jurisdiction of this nation, are due.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">CAUTION: one still can not run into a court
of law within the U.S. and just say "I demand justice," why?</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNIXl_k1rk25PmF2mEOnaGG9Trfxs-AvkE7J489voebkKuiYwUNp-Z8LbwXXkJjCUJTHO7-kd0ofr9zvEP-6K-bIXgQMG3qvV9E0ZQz7JitcIhvuol8_CB8kLDlsgKAA3Av3r4aJ3Q6Ds/s1600/MP900410154.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNIXl_k1rk25PmF2mEOnaGG9Trfxs-AvkE7J489voebkKuiYwUNp-Z8LbwXXkJjCUJTHO7-kd0ofr9zvEP-6K-bIXgQMG3qvV9E0ZQz7JitcIhvuol8_CB8kLDlsgKAA3Av3r4aJ3Q6Ds/s200/MP900410154.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Our Constitution
appears to this writer to be drafted in the vein of establishing justice, not
securing the same as a right.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This is
evident when it states: "We The People of the United States in Order to
form a more perfect Union, establish justice…"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">A search of the Constitution reveals that the
word "justice" appears in this document some eight times, and to this
writer the only other time it appears in the context of which we are concerned
is when it states in Article IV, Section 2, ¶2 that: "A person charged in
any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from
justice…"</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
One of the aims of
this blog is to enlighten the viewers to this so-called "appearance of
justice." I spoke on this within
the posting entitled "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/absolute-immunity-via-recusal.html">Absolute Immunity viaRecusal</a></span>." There I stated
that: "<span style="font-style: italic;">There is a huge difference between
the due administration of justice and the appearance of doing justice</span>." Hence, just as a crowd chants "No
justice, No Peace," I shout "<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Appearances of doing justice grants no piece of justice,
conceals injustice and harbors treason on the part of judicial officers
partaking in said makings of the appearance of doing justice.</span>"</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
To this writer
justice comes when all the things that are considered just are followed. Hence,
if we are expected to submit to the law, we should be given notice of that
law. If that law is written as to give
notice, then its application should be a guarantee, and it should work the same
each and every time. You've herd it
before "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bQnxlHZsjY">So it is written, so it shall be done</a></span>." So what, you may ask, what does that mean?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkwwfw-uBEtFEpVU3weqNC-qrzQC81heKSPfPWKtej_PPbGjESrQYFtjRl97CcW9QVDvNOf9ZCiGEDaG_geiJXQb63_AkL1GubisPcoLQ7lrkM72yBUO_KonibAjQPZqjdZqU3JhnydLs/s1600/MC900297161.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkwwfw-uBEtFEpVU3weqNC-qrzQC81heKSPfPWKtej_PPbGjESrQYFtjRl97CcW9QVDvNOf9ZCiGEDaG_geiJXQb63_AkL1GubisPcoLQ7lrkM72yBUO_KonibAjQPZqjdZqU3JhnydLs/s1600/MC900297161.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">So it is written, so it shall be done, </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">becomes
a demand now because it has the authority of the law upon which it is written.
Get it?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I think that's why back in Roman
times the ruler was under great pressure to uphold the laws he stated, had
written and then enforced.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Please join me later
for "Alternative View To A Plea, (part II), where we will continue with
Plea vs. Prayer, you won't want to miss it. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-44023232037508758002012-03-24T17:41:00.000-07:002012-03-24T17:44:37.692-07:00Do Tell-Do Tell, Inform vs. Insinuate?<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_q9Y5be4OTa_D_C52T5eEg4EJF0ErDtLmApwHSu0nHW-ZL56dD6Agbv2njpeCghpgNDl6yVngQU9T6hqImhkjsG-eSSeNGTYeeCQ7KM5Ji6Yf0j3YT_xbCLlghispXYhheDobiLlaOaA/s1600/MP900430507.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_q9Y5be4OTa_D_C52T5eEg4EJF0ErDtLmApwHSu0nHW-ZL56dD6Agbv2njpeCghpgNDl6yVngQU9T6hqImhkjsG-eSSeNGTYeeCQ7KM5Ji6Yf0j3YT_xbCLlghispXYhheDobiLlaOaA/s200/MP900430507.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">It has recently been
brought to my attention that I was not to be told and or informed of some
recent developments in the news concerning an issue that has garnered national
attention. Viewers of my blog know that I strive to present a basis in fact and
law on the topics that I write about. Hence, basis in fact: "</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic;">Shhhhhhh. Don't tell the +Gaming Oracle. LOL,</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"
as to the existence of a sarcastic request that I not be told.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The above statement
was the follow up of one stating that: "<span style="font-style: italic;">I
can see that any view point outside of your sources and particular mindset are
to be Media Mattered. More's the pity for you</span>." Seeking not to
engage in a back and forth battle of words with this writer I will share with
all that I have not presented a bitter nor abusive speech or writing, which
should cause me shame, because said speech was based upon my understanding as
follows here within. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0gARwlUa1ZHs-R9Wxppe6fakmQSjfqdMLpLa4D_KZRsKyfPawb21oVrzQv0pQ8RjdGcwGS_WGeE-626zsWsD7neZGcoA_dXEriqEVvs4d-JPlc_zioADaqOvStCUJpGheBQUa_MCXRgM/s1600/MP900185047.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0gARwlUa1ZHs-R9Wxppe6fakmQSjfqdMLpLa4D_KZRsKyfPawb21oVrzQv0pQ8RjdGcwGS_WGeE-626zsWsD7neZGcoA_dXEriqEVvs4d-JPlc_zioADaqOvStCUJpGheBQUa_MCXRgM/s200/MP900185047.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">In discussing the
topic at issue, which happens to be the right of citizen's and individual's
within the jurisdiction of these United States of America, to have a
Constitutional Right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. (The
Fact) My sources informed me that said
fact held a basis in law according to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution
of the United States of America and the following decisional case law
established further basis in law.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Devenpeck v. Alford, 125
S.Ct. 588, 593, </span><span style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5049965231780676020&q=543+U.S.+146&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">543 U.S. 146</a></span><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">, (U.S. 2004)</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">[1] [2] </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">The Fourth Amendment protects “the right of the
people</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” In conformity with the rule at common law, a
warrant-less arrest by a law officer is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
where there is </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">probable
cause to believe that a criminal offense has been or is being committed</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. See United
States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 414-424, 96 S.Ct. 820, 46 L.Ed. 2d 598 (1976); Brinegar v. United States, 338
U.S. 160, 175-176, 69 S. Ct. 1302, 93 L.Ed.
1879 (1949). Whether probable
cause exists depends upon the reasonable conclusion to be drawn from the </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">facts known to the
arresting officer at the time of the arrest</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366, 371, 124
S. Ct. 795, 157 L.Ed. 2d 769
(2003). In [543 U.S. 153] this case, the
Court of Appeals held that the probable-cause inquiry is further confined to
the known facts bearing upon the offense actually invoked at the time of
arrest, and that (in addition) the offense supported by these known facts must be “closely
related” to the offense that the officer invoked. 333 F.3d, at 976. We find no basis in precedent or reason for
this limitation.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Although there are
some that will argue otherwise, but it is this writers understanding that the
ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States are to be applied by all lower
courts. So, the above tells me that what
matters is that the person arresting someone without a warrant should have
probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been or is being
committed. Is walking back home with a pack of skittles and an iced tea an
offense?</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
It further appears
to this writer that the nation has reason to be concerned about the actual
cause of this young man death. From my
understanding they are troubled by the "but for cause" of the shooter
leaving his vehicle when he was told by the 911 operator he (the shooter) was
talking to, "no we don't need you to follow." Hence I say and there are several that will
say "but for the shooter getting out of his vehicle, contrary to the 911
operator's instruction not to follow the alleged suspect, Trayvon Martin would
still be alive to tell us his side of the story. (The Facts Known to Me)</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Tose v. Greate Bay Hotel and
Casino, </span><span style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3517255377786733437&q=819+F.Supp.1312&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">819 F.Supp.1312</a></span><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">, at [HN8]</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">An initial consideration in
the “proximate cause” determination is whether defendant’s conduct was a “cause
in fact” of plaintiffs’ loss.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> Kulas v. Public Service Elec. And Gas Co., 41 N.J. 311, 317, 196 A.2d 769
(1964). Plaintiff must </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">show that the particular
harmful event at issue would not have occurred </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">but for</span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;"> the defendant’s
negligence.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> Id. As
to the necessary degree of causation, “it is generally sufficient if
defendant’s negligent conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the
injuries.” Rappaport, 31 N.J. at 203;
see also Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc., 53 N.J. 463, 483, 251 A.2d 278
(1969).</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The decisional case
law above seems to state that there is a basis in law for the people's outcry
for justice, but the police and the shooter have plainly stated that they have
made there own determination and there is no need for a jury to decide that "but
for Mr. Zimmerman getting out of his vehicle, Trayvon Martin would not have
been shot to death."</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Legal minds in the
"media" know this, lawyers outside the confines of journalistic
reporting know this as well. I would ask
that they "Do Tell-Do Tell" that but for Mr. Zimmerman's acts of
ignoring trained law enforcement officials request that he disengage, Trayvon
Martin would be alive. But, he is not alive, his mother has acknowledged the
screams of her child calling for help, and the father has joined her in telling
the rest of the world that they cannot rest until their son's killer is brought
to justice. (Fact)</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmNeFa_LFu9F0qMkaberEheZZvVJqjsRSnx1RvpQxZFrtJkIrtzcnT_hhfe3dIF9dSIwk22ggJmZirAmBpq37Y-EN8jTlTsRHJ3PiEOmuthjCODZShqylAehj_1ouJS8guqbRej7ls7hw/s1600/MP900442526.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmNeFa_LFu9F0qMkaberEheZZvVJqjsRSnx1RvpQxZFrtJkIrtzcnT_hhfe3dIF9dSIwk22ggJmZirAmBpq37Y-EN8jTlTsRHJ3PiEOmuthjCODZShqylAehj_1ouJS8guqbRej7ls7hw/s200/MP900442526.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I know that all of
you join me in applauding the strength and courage of the family of Trayvon
Martin. Please if you have not done so already, show your support of this
family in their time of loss by signing their petition for justice at </span><a href="https://www.change.org/petitions/prosecute-the-killer-of-our-son-17-year-old-trayvon-martin" style="font-size: 11pt;">https://www.change.org/petitions/prosecute-the-killer-of-our-son-17-year-old-trayvon-martin</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
Thank you, </div>
<div style="font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>
<br />Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-32399655441282282812012-03-23T03:22:00.000-07:002012-03-23T03:22:10.465-07:00Abramoff Should Be Flattered<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6tVgu2vvkgigp64o_NL9gSBmKAr1cmavez8JcoNma86xqP3qV3Q2nQg6TOEer0ZRvl_IE90LLGLqsswPTu0GrjfQ0EDo7HR7aPIaMnJxO0eFJFz9HMW1mJJtL0QloKRcRlfktJHgYyhY/s1600/MC900343857.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="149" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6tVgu2vvkgigp64o_NL9gSBmKAr1cmavez8JcoNma86xqP3qV3Q2nQg6TOEer0ZRvl_IE90LLGLqsswPTu0GrjfQ0EDo7HR7aPIaMnJxO0eFJFz9HMW1mJJtL0QloKRcRlfktJHgYyhY/s200/MC900343857.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">We all know the
phrase, "Imitation is the highest form of flattery," well Jack
Abramoff is beaming right about now, because his old nemesis, former chief of
the U.S. Department of Justice Public Integrity Section, Noel L. Hillman, and
now a United States District Judge, has taken his (Abramoff's) tactic's
directly into the courts.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
You see Mr. Abramoff
found a way to have "obscure language" written into the laws to
benefit his clients. This language was
so obscure the lawmakers presenting the bills would be able to claim not
knowing that it was in there, and or
what it meant. Hey! I'm just the messenger, because like you I
deem that "willful ignorance" at a minimum, but that’s what they did
and do. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9r7J6fBZBO4oFuOUpBOIp2Jm2qv5845tQUHgXbmm7wHBOr9Hh_y1eXFl3QtmkrXA68HshuPOkbBVW9401Gzz5j04ibBrv-mpwcFGCgKqb2G4Beui0_Ua2ukoeNLq1GOLcYnRn4kE7rXU/s1600/MC900216944.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9r7J6fBZBO4oFuOUpBOIp2Jm2qv5845tQUHgXbmm7wHBOr9Hh_y1eXFl3QtmkrXA68HshuPOkbBVW9401Gzz5j04ibBrv-mpwcFGCgKqb2G4Beui0_Ua2ukoeNLq1GOLcYnRn4kE7rXU/s200/MC900216944.jpg" width="117" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yeah, yeah-- who am
I to make such claims.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">How about you
getting it straight from the horses mouth so to speak.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">CBS News "60 Minutes" did a show
with Mr. Abramoff and now there is a clip out from this show entitled </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7387336n&tag=segementExtraScroller;housing">Abramoff's "perfect" tactic</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">, in which Mr.
Abramoff can be seen doing all to keep from bursting into laughter while
detailing the above tactic.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You know how
I do by now, so go ahead click the link, I'll wait the clip is 50 seconds…</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Okay, you're back,
educated and ready to follow me on this one right? Not! That's not how I do, I share the facts, and
basis in law then you become the judge. Never forget that. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Near the end of the
above video you can hear Mr. Abramoff say that the lawmakers don't read what's
in the bills. Hmm? So what are they
being paid for? Oh, my bad, they are
elected so that they can go to Washington to collect bribes. But back to Noel L. Hillman and how he has
adopted this tactic. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Noel L. Hillman
assumed that we the public are like the above lawmakers and would not read his
opinions nor be able to see the "obscure language" tucked away within
its footnotes. Again I must refer to a nursery
rhyme, "along came a spider and sat down beside her and…"</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-bHvndOWfgGIr5V7DTrMD40UA8S3JR3tJ_hkBmsjqtRTk1SWkhOU97R1gw_Ph-7b4Tnnt6Itt1BlI6pcsyYsk3nZgqfHqu8QAWQmildb8vAood9je0roj3AV-h0xUFIATS7W1CmWdHow/s1600/MC900390916.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-bHvndOWfgGIr5V7DTrMD40UA8S3JR3tJ_hkBmsjqtRTk1SWkhOU97R1gw_Ph-7b4Tnnt6Itt1BlI6pcsyYsk3nZgqfHqu8QAWQmildb8vAood9je0roj3AV-h0xUFIATS7W1CmWdHow/s1600/MC900390916.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'm that spider,
because now that I have read Hillman's opinion and exposed it within the
following posts: </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/agent-of-change.html">Agent of Change</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">, </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/jshit-8-have-judge-that-will-lie.html">JSHIT #8, Have Judge That Will Lie!</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">, and </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2011/12/gratia-ex-gratia-aah-jshit.html">A gratia--Ex Gratia--Aah JSHIT</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">, just to cite a few,
Hillman has gone silent.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">As of this
writing his response to my recusal motion is 32 days past due.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">My most appreciated and loyal viewers know
the afore postings and have seen there offerings, but for those unfamiliar, or
those needing to refresh, go ahead click away I'll wait…</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
This is a culture
folks, a training so to speak. Judge
Noel L. Hillman is attempting to proselytize us into thinking that Mark Kosko
did not kidnap me on May 15, 2006. He
got to one African-American by the name of Karen M. William, but just so
happens she's a Magistrate Judge being tutored by him. (Yeah right, you know I
don't mean that especially after posting <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/proselytization-of-kmw.html">Proselytization of KMW</a></span>.)</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqisXFSQfk61DPQNKh8N6-scDilpwI_dum0NChZzyBxEaM2dGDLMoZBOd66Z_nyNq1Gf0RSKYf3hTWvzOzSRy3lyc0WYymgWFQ4GRptcJ3Fw5ALt5G2a46IuM8w1ECU11s2yCZ-qGdWA0/s1600/MC900196328.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="198" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqisXFSQfk61DPQNKh8N6-scDilpwI_dum0NChZzyBxEaM2dGDLMoZBOd66Z_nyNq1Gf0RSKYf3hTWvzOzSRy3lyc0WYymgWFQ4GRptcJ3Fw5ALt5G2a46IuM8w1ECU11s2yCZ-qGdWA0/s200/MC900196328.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">In closing, again don't believe me, view the facts then
judge for yourselves. Yes I have another CBS 60 Minute clip for you entitled
"</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7387342n&tag=segementExtraScroller;housing">Culture of corruption</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">," which should help you form your own opinions.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'll be back with more, so you go ahead and
check out this minute and a half clip at your leisure, but join me again to
continue this revelation.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
Thank
you, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
The
Casino Gaming Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-13002372443260528552012-03-22T01:47:00.000-07:002012-03-22T01:47:44.472-07:00Archives Opens the Eyes<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS8N8yJyeJwh2umWZoVH-f64Ad4ZHdHCyCwdpjEIg6bN7FsQPZf0xE40GLsrmCk_UEAQ9CPoQso8NW-1Ux7kmJXzMBBsI2B34pa1aybtamA_iV7WwbPIYb9WTNMUXU8epcPzjSU6roul0/s1600/MP900411737.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS8N8yJyeJwh2umWZoVH-f64Ad4ZHdHCyCwdpjEIg6bN7FsQPZf0xE40GLsrmCk_UEAQ9CPoQso8NW-1Ux7kmJXzMBBsI2B34pa1aybtamA_iV7WwbPIYb9WTNMUXU8epcPzjSU6roul0/s200/MP900411737.JPG" width="156" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">While he was the
chief of the U.S. Department of Justice Public Integrity Section, Noel L.
Hillman was quoted as saying, "</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic;">If you
abuse the power of your office to advance your own political and financial
interests at the expense of the people who elected you, the Department of
Justice will identify you, investigate you and prosecute you to the fullest
extent of the law</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The above quote can
be found within the archives of Harper's Magazine's article entitled </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
"<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/07/hbc-90000509">Noel Hillman and the Siegelman Case</a></span>," written by
Scott Horton. I found that after reading
this article my distrust of this judge were well placed, because the article
leaves one believing that Judge Hillman received his judgeship under questionable
circumstances. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbaZBAaKWlU5T1Mi4idkJTfBhpN5siTB85M8xll_z8E_SQgcXsJVRHMDV5zWjXmvm9CRXU-vMZMISk-Osm0tVPZ_iwi8s8ianxYaBuuhx2UBhh9LhnE15kJKGwQn_qbMZF83PjUJeovZE/s1600/MP900289005.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="131" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbaZBAaKWlU5T1Mi4idkJTfBhpN5siTB85M8xll_z8E_SQgcXsJVRHMDV5zWjXmvm9CRXU-vMZMISk-Osm0tVPZ_iwi8s8ianxYaBuuhx2UBhh9LhnE15kJKGwQn_qbMZF83PjUJeovZE/s200/MP900289005.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">It appears from the
article that the Bush administration did not want the "Jack Abramoff
Capitol Hill lobbying scandal" to take out all of the good ole boy's so,
then prosecutor Hillman was offered a judgeship back in New Jersey. Please,
read the article for yourself and you be the judge, because as far as I'm
concerned the next article supports my belief.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The above Harper's
Magazine article was released in 2007.
The other article that I am referring to that supports my belief that
Hillman was sent away is a Jan. 2006 article released by Martin Garbus for the
Huffington Post, entitled "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martin-garbus/bushs-blatant-attempt-to-_b_14700.html">Bush'sBlatant Attempt to Obstruct and End the Abramoff Investigation</a>." </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Mr. Garbus says
within this article that "<span style="font-style: italic;">At some point,
it all becomes unbelievable.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-bottom: 10pt; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">President
George W. Bush has not made many moves more unethical than offering Noel L.
Hillman, the Abramoff prosecutor, a federal judgeship. Hillman has apparently
been talking with Bush's representatives since last year, and on last Thursday,
he publicly announced he was accepting the appointment</span>."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2rPyS1HmWBi0x-AUxaCnjyGwyIB6q7cqIEGd5GE-7KlE2twupBof2B1KaMAS8HZ2-V5c3flR-Mtss7Phczl8P7j4Ch2WVwnI2yFpzC-adrALqUu46zg6mUuAplRbtfkUZCCzcbif1wPQ/s1600/MP900341412.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2rPyS1HmWBi0x-AUxaCnjyGwyIB6q7cqIEGd5GE-7KlE2twupBof2B1KaMAS8HZ2-V5c3flR-Mtss7Phczl8P7j4Ch2WVwnI2yFpzC-adrALqUu46zg6mUuAplRbtfkUZCCzcbif1wPQ/s200/MP900341412.JPG" width="142" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-bottom: 10pt; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Again I'll just
deliver the message and you can read the letter for yourself, but I believe, because I see the whole scenario as the start of Hillmans "judicial
Jedi" -NOT!- let's keep it real and call it what it is "Judicial
Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics" (JSHIT) training.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The sad part is that
Hillmans former target admitted his guilt, did his time and now you can see him
on the internet telling the world about how he was able to do what he did. Yes, I think by now that you know I have more
in store, but today I just wanted to introduce you to my basis in facts. These facts shed light as to why Judge Noel
L. Hillman has refused to write an opinion in answer to my motion that he
recuse himself. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5-xu94t3OdfaE_Gxpgs577mmmtkWGKteYCoYpOpWmX-t2lWTGw1NnyteyzKQOgUVqgpsea-gXbEK8VtWtCdQOXpLfSUZ4aM3MsfXqYdfrZL7o9HrpNNb86jneu6bgD69y_WaV_DIeII8/s1600/MM900173988.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5-xu94t3OdfaE_Gxpgs577mmmtkWGKteYCoYpOpWmX-t2lWTGw1NnyteyzKQOgUVqgpsea-gXbEK8VtWtCdQOXpLfSUZ4aM3MsfXqYdfrZL7o9HrpNNb86jneu6bgD69y_WaV_DIeII8/s1600/MM900173988.GIF" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">You see this judge
only knows how to take order's, he has no business writing them. He has sold
out, because that can be the only answer when his past statement claim that he
is for justice, but when it's time for him to met it out, he can't because his bosses
have not instructed him to do so.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Once
he attempted to take out a Casino lobbyist and now he is the Casino Shield.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
But you read the
articles for yourself and you be the judge. Are the archives an eye opener?</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank you,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-49996481471976390452012-03-15T05:54:00.000-07:002012-03-15T09:05:12.335-07:00Authentic Document? (JSHIT!) I'LL SAY.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZYcFEXr89uAGNRo59lNH_57bEeXlsGfSQabs272qb1h6c0scsNP5l16uvHYqJf9vb-qXAlN42rlSFrDTL3Ip2-M7b5mjwmLX9dshOt6mWryyFBDko-PwF6-o58s2rgxtPRW530h0VwD8/s1600/MC900187537.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZYcFEXr89uAGNRo59lNH_57bEeXlsGfSQabs272qb1h6c0scsNP5l16uvHYqJf9vb-qXAlN42rlSFrDTL3Ip2-M7b5mjwmLX9dshOt6mWryyFBDko-PwF6-o58s2rgxtPRW530h0VwD8/s200/MC900187537.jpg" width="199" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Smiling faces do
tell lies, and boy oh boy do I have proofs that one good ole boy has stabbed
himself with his own pen.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
In my last post,
which is entitled "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/agent-of-change.html">Agent of Change</a></span>," I
highlighted "undisputedly authentic document," and promised that we
would discuss this later. Well that time
has come, and there is nothing better than when a liar substantiates his own
lies. Now I have solid documentary proof
that Judge Noel L. Hillman is a liar (especially as it relates to civil actions
08-cv-02407 and 11-cv-06304) and at a minimum, outwardly hypocritical as
revealed by his own writings as I will share with you herein, so that you may
concur or disagree. Fair enough?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigmPFKK5vejBBqyQZRW9pP1mtzb8DPT-LWJGdMmJVFKzvbfYu5ZloFQIurJ94SMUi8MpTRzJ6Nw3dKehjj3iEOmOReY2JqZ-nVFfA01IenYVd8k-P9CJQhluV0DGWnq6M5WoZn8X9C3d0/s1600/MP900448706.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigmPFKK5vejBBqyQZRW9pP1mtzb8DPT-LWJGdMmJVFKzvbfYu5ZloFQIurJ94SMUi8MpTRzJ6Nw3dKehjj3iEOmOReY2JqZ-nVFfA01IenYVd8k-P9CJQhluV0DGWnq6M5WoZn8X9C3d0/s200/MP900448706.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">The fifth paragraph
of "Agent of Change" introduced my supporters to "civil action
09-5617, </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Jackson v. Grondolsky, Dist. Court, D. New
Jersey 2011</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">." This opinion
was written by Judge Noel L. Hillman on December 23, 2011. Please keep in mind that since his 9/27/2010
opinion within 08-cv-02407 I have been doing all to show that this judge is
utilizing "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactic's" (JSHIT) to exact his personal interpretations
of the law. Now I will show that once
revealed he is now attempting to try and appear to be on the up-and-up. I think they (the judicial system) call it
"the appearance of justice".</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Before we begin, we
also need to establish that <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14546008231013085018&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">Jackson v. Grondolsky</a> was in fact written by Judge Noel L. Hillman, which is clear once one view said
fact within the opinion itself. Go ahead
click the link see here it says: "Opinion Noel L. Hillman, District
Judge," I'll wait…</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Okay we've got that
out of the way, next. Let us solidly
establish that the citing by this judge is actually found within the above
opinion at section IV ANALYSIS, and within the seventh paragraph of this
section. This way all can find it when
they click the link, scroll down to that section, and count down to the seventh
paragraph and find: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
"<span style="font-style: italic;">An exception to the general rule on considering
matters extraneous to the pleadings permits "the Court [to] consider </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">(1) exhibits attached to the
complaint</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, (2) matters of public record,
and (3) all documents that are integral to or explicitly relied upon in the
complaint without converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary
judgment." D.G. v. Somerset Hills School Dist., 559 F. Supp. 2d 484, 491
(D.N.J. 2008); see also M & M Stone Co. v. Pennsylvania, 388 F. App'x 156,
162 (3d Cir. 2010) ("In reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, it is
well-established that a court should `consider only the allegations in the
complaint, exhibits attached to the complaint, matters of public record, and
documents that form the basis of a claim.'") (citation omitted).
Additionally, "a court may [also] consider an </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">undisputedly
authentic document</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> that a defendant
attaches as an exhibit to a motion to dismiss if the plaintiff's claims are
based on the document." Pension Ben. Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. Indus.,
Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993).</span>"</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Every one with me so
far? Okay, one more thing we have to
establish, and that is the fact that this judge shows that he is a hypocrite
when he cites the above, yet when one looks to his September 27, 2010 opinion
in <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13405143048046505225&q=Hickson+v+Marina+Associates&hl=en&as_sdt=3,31&as_ylo=2010">Hickson v. Marina Associates</a></span>, one will not
find the word exhibit written once. Now
you can click the link, copy the case, paste it to a word processing program
with "word search" capabilities to verify this fact. Or, you can take my word for it, and trust
me. I'll attest to this fact under
penalty of perjury, but if you must go ahead I'll be here... </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBNgH5m13btBIwQM2lNmcIPFfY40WTTjlPBH8r_gVTOPlgsmR0_jKD76tYKaLXNhXbycoYXlyPSWHJqa3EcqqzCzgrBvoiusEPxDx0tSuLt19o04E5pEw4m0YoVnKYGJKic1skHJtUjes/s1600/MP900400848.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBNgH5m13btBIwQM2lNmcIPFfY40WTTjlPBH8r_gVTOPlgsmR0_jKD76tYKaLXNhXbycoYXlyPSWHJqa3EcqqzCzgrBvoiusEPxDx0tSuLt19o04E5pEw4m0YoVnKYGJKic1skHJtUjes/s200/MP900400848.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now since I make the
strong statement that this judge is a hypocrite, I'd better have some strong
proofs other than the lack of the word "exhibit" being missing from
his opinion, right?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well you know how I
do.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'll let you be the judge because as
you can see above, judge Hillman writes with his own hand that he knows of case
law that says: "</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">An
exception to the general rule on considering matters extraneous to the
pleadings permits "the Court [to] consider (1) exhibits attached to the
complaint.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well did I
attach exhibits to the complaint?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Let's
see.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
You be the judge,
click this link where you will find a true copy of the "<span style="color: red;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1nZXLmzKrmnZ3Z2c0h4QktSYmlaU2tyYi1pZEljZw">Third Amended Complaint</a></span>," the same as the copy
Judge Noel L. Hillman and the "Liars for Hire" received, and you be
the judge as to the attachment of "Exhibit A" through "Exhibit
Q" at pages 43 through 78 respectively. Go ahead click away I'll wait…</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfJ5Q5q-pDazrYcs7yp5w7pXpP9rjzWJQYYiv2w9AzECgfo97BP6dhrOeSUpXzWEXxB-sjjIFz-ordvH93gYVMsDbP75BMNGlUt4DMHQ0gp4jHf4iWDnPgHlrp4vMP3cFsltVROv48M1U/s1600/MP900178593.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfJ5Q5q-pDazrYcs7yp5w7pXpP9rjzWJQYYiv2w9AzECgfo97BP6dhrOeSUpXzWEXxB-sjjIFz-ordvH93gYVMsDbP75BMNGlUt4DMHQ0gp4jHf4iWDnPgHlrp4vMP3cFsltVROv48M1U/s200/MP900178593.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">By now all of the
professional lawyers out there are saying, "but what about undisputedly
authentic document," where were you going with that one Gaming
Oracle?"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hey thanks for asking, I
have no idea why they call lawyers sharks, for picking up on that, I say you
guy's are sharp.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">But, you still won't
catch me attempting to brush their teeth or diving into courtroom waters with
an open cut on my ass, that's asking to be eaten alive by those patrolling said
waters.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If I may tread over
the line of long-windedness, let me "splain." [little flava for the
non-attorneys.] Again we have to look at<span style="color: red;"> <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13405143048046505225&q=Hickson+v+Marina+Associates&hl=en&as_sdt=3,31&as_ylo=2010">Judge Hillmans opinion of 9/27/2010</a></span>, one clicking the
link will find upon scrolling down to, "2. Section 1983 Claims Alleging
Malicious Prosecution, False Arrest/Imprisonment, and Abuse of Process Against
State Defendants," at the 8th paragraph of that section they will find that
Judge Noel L. Hillman relied upon a deposition by stating:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
"<span style="font-style: italic;">During her deposition, Fedaczynsky testified that she
had won over a hundred dollars on the slot machine and while she went to tell
her husband, 371*371 Hickson took the money from the machine and walked away.</span>"</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Now this is where
the lawyers could help us out, because if they truly acted like top predators,
and devoured those practicing injustice they would confirm what I am setting
forth here. But… So now I am left to show you that this deposition was in
dispute and Judge Noel L. Hillman knew it was in dispute, and now that civil
action 11-cv-06304 is on the record he cannot allow [now party] Ms. Fedaczynsky
to answer a complaint that would show that said deposition never took place on
July 9, 2009 in Hackensack, NJ. [All
starting to come together huh?]</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
One tending to take
my word could click to " <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2011/12/gratia-ex-gratia-aah-jshit.html">A gratia--Ex Gratia--Aah JSHIT</a></span>," scroll down to (JSHIT #5)
and read how I had questioned said deposition. Then I could further bolster the fact that
Judge Noel L. Hillman knew that I disputed the authenticity of this document by
showing you a document filed with the court before he rendered his opinion, how
would that sit? </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Well lets take a
look at civil action 08-cv-02407 docket item [<span style="color: red;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1nZXLmzKrmnRXZlRTc0TTFRZ3FHYmE0Umd0RjNmZw">47main</a></span>],
which is my "SUR-REPLY TO DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION AND RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Scheduled for hearing on February 1, 2010." Upon clicking the link and either scrolling
to page 4 or clicking page four in the left side of the document one will find
that I set forth the following to Judge Noel L. Hillman within this document:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
"<span style="font-style: italic;">Upon my receipt of copy of the above Response in
Opposition for Summary Judgment, on Saturday January 23, 2010 I did come to see
why Mr. Mauro refused to give me a copy of the purported deposition taken from
Ms. Fedaczynsky on July 9, 2009. </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">This transcript is a fraud</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> filed within the United States District Court for
the District of New Jersey that clearly states on its face that it was to be
filed within the “SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY COUNTY OF
CAMDEN.” It further claims to be the
“Deposition of SHARON FEDACZYNSKY, taken by the Defendant, pursuant to
Subpoena, held at the Bergen County Bar Association of 15 Bergen Street,
Hackensack, New Jersey, before Tracy Cook, a Certified Shorthand Reporter and
Notary of the State of New Jersey.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">Page three line three of the above says: SHARON FEDACZYNSKY, 131 Orchard Street,
Garfield, New Jersey 07026, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">having first been duly sworn by a Notary Public of the State of New
York</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, was examined and testified as
follow:. The State of New Jersey,
Department of the Treasury, Division of Revenues, NEW JERSEY NOTARY PUBLIC
MANUAL, (section) What is a Notary Public holds:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .75in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">A Notary Public is a public officer who serves as an
impartial witness to the signing of documents and to the acknowledgment of
signatures on documents. A Notary Public
may also administer oaths and affirmations.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .75in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">A duly appointed New Jersey Notary
Public is</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> authorized to perform notary
services throughout the State of New Jersey.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">This document was not the target for the case at bar
for </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">the above document
filed by unethical attorney Christopher C. Mauro was intended to support the
case of Eric Hickson</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. See (Attachment #2). The </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">document further evidences this</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> by holding on page three line three: “Mr. Hickson,
Eric Hickson, the plaintiff in this case is representing himself. </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">If I am in fact in an honorable court</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> an honorable judge will follow the rules of
professional conduct and </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">report
said fraud by Mr. Mauro</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, if not the
court will </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">proceed to
admit said fraudulent document into the record and deny me my right to the
holdings of FRCVP 28,</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> which say that the
deposition shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by
the laws of the United States or of the place where the examination is
held… Until Mr. Mauro produces the
Notary Public’s New Jersey State license number </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">the above filed deposition of Ms. Fedaczynsky is
nothing more than a fraud and proof of Harrah’s continued willful and wanton
misconduct, attempts to mislead a Federal Court of law and effort to avoid
liability for its actions of May 15, 2006 upon which this action is couched.</span>"</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Please note the
stamp from the clerk of the court at the top of the document when you click the
link, as this confirms that this document was filed as docket item [47], and it
was filed on 02/02/2010. So now you can
see that some 7 months and 25 days before 9/27/2010, Judge Noel L. Hillman knew
that plaintiff Earl Hickson disputed the authenticity of the purported
deposition attached to the defendants motion, and what did he do? Well as Richard Pryor would say "you're
looking at the symptoms."</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
So now knowing that
I would seek justice and reveal this (JSHIT), Judge Hillman did consider
cleaning up his act, or should I say, attempt to wipe his ass clean, thereby
trying to remove all indications of his court's bowel movements reflecting a
proclivity towards (JSHIT). As a Bugs Bunny Cartoon character would say,
"you said that?," while pointing to words on the screen below, and as
I point to the afore sentence. Yes, I
said that and Judge Noel L. Hillman's actions support the same, and his further
refusal to recuse himself from these matters reflect that he knows he and Karen
M. Williams are caught red handed, or should I say with "judicial
misconduct (JSHIT) skid marks" left in their drawers. This goes beyond
having your hand in the cookie jar folks, there will be no licking of the
fingers here. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLSaQWTN6Mi7KHWkYQiV9u33k_PUFwRQGwfy3vXMirnudrx_g7Cu5bUYQvx6ys8uqrfLp_ZJPr1msjeFIWr1rfrmq9p4ei0hH93MqwBKBanj4eqBSXQZjMBMyBntwgjQjXjiAYZuZaiR4/s1600/MP900431825.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLSaQWTN6Mi7KHWkYQiV9u33k_PUFwRQGwfy3vXMirnudrx_g7Cu5bUYQvx6ys8uqrfLp_ZJPr1msjeFIWr1rfrmq9p4ei0hH93MqwBKBanj4eqBSXQZjMBMyBntwgjQjXjiAYZuZaiR4/s200/MP900431825.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well the above
depends, no pun intended, but can you imagine the size of the
"depends" that will be needed when this shit hits the fan?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well if that happens I guess I'll be left
quoting another one of my favorite comedians, Dave Chappelle, when he said that
he hunted down a crack-head that stole a candy bar out of his car and upon
finding the guy with chocolate around his mouth the crack-head said, "this
ain't chocolate that's do-doo baby."</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well I'll be saying Judge Hillman's opinion is not based upon authentic
documents, that's (JSHIT) baby.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNHPj53ERSiT_RiR-9vz7E_WXGwSGAUxOq6cHOmHxQwxUSyGC90M0iBic1SkMUbZuPS5z2Njy6p-67ux1trwcIcmAhgyRuhFmRAfL4hwW3dMfEBNl4ueoj4jV3vW8urXDFVMuiqXmIY9M/s1600/MC900312392.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNHPj53ERSiT_RiR-9vz7E_WXGwSGAUxOq6cHOmHxQwxUSyGC90M0iBic1SkMUbZuPS5z2Njy6p-67ux1trwcIcmAhgyRuhFmRAfL4hwW3dMfEBNl4ueoj4jV3vW8urXDFVMuiqXmIY9M/s200/MC900312392.jpg" width="129" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">On the real, I
didn't crack not one smile while writing this to share it with you, because I
am not lying, but you be the judge baby.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Share it with a friend or two and see if they reach the same conclusion,
I'll wait, because I have nothing but time as Hillman is now some 23 days late
with his response to my motion for recusal due on 2/21/2012.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That's some more (JSHIT) for you baby!</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thanks, for hanging
in here with me, and all your views and support.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-50928009420887180492012-03-14T00:36:00.000-07:002012-03-14T01:35:21.343-07:00Agent of Change<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOLTuCKTSuLQ6h-2zo5Eot1ek1erAsH6EIIwd9J2U87vPyLtiJC78eaq1szVNbZsjoRn9M6OSVrvTxguef2HX7G3CM1M5JMmPTWdyncTigAvv1rXfVe_eDMoS8br7OKYmnE18cba3JHqg/s1600/MP900448706.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOLTuCKTSuLQ6h-2zo5Eot1ek1erAsH6EIIwd9J2U87vPyLtiJC78eaq1szVNbZsjoRn9M6OSVrvTxguef2HX7G3CM1M5JMmPTWdyncTigAvv1rXfVe_eDMoS8br7OKYmnE18cba3JHqg/s200/MP900448706.JPG" width="133" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">With other things in
the works I will show you that when one stands his or her ground in a court of
law he or she can be an agent of change.</span><br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Some will have time
to read Judge Noel L. Hillmans September 27, 2010, Opinion in civil action
08-cv-02407 in it's entirety, and some will rely on my word. For this posting you will have to decide for
yourselves, which path you shall take.
The aforementioned opinion is reported as Hickson v. Marina Associates, <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13405143048046505225&q=Hickson+v+Marina+Associates&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">743 F.Supp.2d 362 (2010)</a></span>, and you can read the full
case by clicking the link. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Those that have been
following this blog know that it was spawned due to the misconduct needed, and
unethical judicial misconduct exacted within the above opinion. A lot has taken place since September 27,
2010, and there is presently a motion before the court for Judge Noel L.
Hillman and Karen M. Williams to recuse themselves from this matter, which is
now on March 14, 2012, some 22 day over due from the purported hearing date of
2/21/2012. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Good ole boy network
member Noel L. Hillman does appear to have learned from his experience in
dealing with this pro se litigant. He
has further exhibited behavior that tends to show that he appears to no longer
under-estimate pro se litigant or he recognizes the power of the venue you are
viewing now. I say this because Hillman
has issued an opinion that supports this belief. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh45Q95SiBeWVOi9RG9LhiwITcPJJ9yw78XXdj87PlFAJ9SB1wlxGf-ph2R1l_N23DunBiHMD37V9AQu0Aa5UXroLqdNUkE_VF6uqB5vnY4PkHz4ynaEvMVRwLcVKnZCueYP25R9t2Mnhw/s1600/MP900422582.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh45Q95SiBeWVOi9RG9LhiwITcPJJ9yw78XXdj87PlFAJ9SB1wlxGf-ph2R1l_N23DunBiHMD37V9AQu0Aa5UXroLqdNUkE_VF6uqB5vnY4PkHz4ynaEvMVRwLcVKnZCueYP25R9t2Mnhw/s200/MP900422582.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
On December 23,
2011, he wrote an opinion in civil action 09-5617, Jackson v. Grondolsky, Dist.
Court, D. New Jersey 2011, wherein he tries to reduce the (JSHIT) exacted upon
pro se litigants. Yet thankfully this opinion also clearly show what this judge
knew or should have known on September 27, 2010, but for some unknown reason
failed to apply in that matter. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
This blog came
online during the second week of November 2011, and all of the other filings
involved in both of the cases referenced in this blog were filed. Hence, Hillman was on notice as to most of
the (JSHIT) that he should shy away from as I was beginning to expose it. Not to mention the fact that the court
records were reflecting the same. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
In the posting
entitled "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/02/bent-of-mind-leads-to-straight.html">Bent of Mind Leads to Straight Injustice</a></span>"
I showed you averment 17 of civil action 11-cv-06304 wherein it is shown that
if one searched Hillman's opinion of 9/27/2010 for the word exhibit, he of she
would get a return of zero matches for that search. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Fast forward to
12/23/2011, and run the same search for the term "exhibit" within
Jackson v. Grondolsky, and you will find that Judge Noel L. Hillman is a bit
more reluctant and less hubristic at willfully omitting citations to the
exhibits presented to him. Hence "Agent of Change."</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizoJGSuCxnxX3nJ3spGuKTZHBp9FE2zUpXEHU5GsJfIzosBQ_UgyoIsgZ-wNWVZcvoDqwt6iGXMbeSd6eKtkFWMqBqFJ-nlbvu_1cX8g75pTGAsSJhYEReojF44MOFseh-fAam_XEaZMI/s1600/MC900196328.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="198" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizoJGSuCxnxX3nJ3spGuKTZHBp9FE2zUpXEHU5GsJfIzosBQ_UgyoIsgZ-wNWVZcvoDqwt6iGXMbeSd6eKtkFWMqBqFJ-nlbvu_1cX8g75pTGAsSJhYEReojF44MOFseh-fAam_XEaZMI/s200/MC900196328.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">But...Let's look
closer at the case and see what a liar and unethical judge we are
dealing with. This man clearly shows that he is aware of the proper standard he
should have followed. There is no other excuse,
now that he has show that he knew that his failure to consider the exhibits
attached to 08-02407 was required, and the lack of mention of the word exhibit
within his ruling in that matter, can be construed as nothing less than willful
ignorance.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Please, don't take
my word for it, see "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14546008231013085018&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">IV ANALYSIS</a></span>"
within Jackson v. Grondolsky where he
states: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
"<span style="font-style: italic;">Pursuant to Rule 12(d), "[i]f, on a motion under
Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not
excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment
under Rule 56." FED. R. CIV. P. 12(d).</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">An exception to the general rule on considering
matters extraneous to the pleadings permits "the Court
[to] consider (1) exhibits attached to
the complaint, (2) matters of public record, and (3) all documents that
are integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint without
converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment." </span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=328821937107031348&q=failed+to+consider+exhibits+attached+to+complaint&hl=en&as_sdt=3,31&as_ylo=2010"><span style="font-style: italic;">D.G. v. Somerset Hills School Dist., 559 F. Supp. 2d
484, 491 (D.N.J. 2008)</span></a><span style="font-style: italic;">; see
also </span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=10832707761611906068&q=failed+to+consider+exhibits+attached+to+complaint&hl=en&as_sdt=3,31&as_ylo=2010"><span style="font-style: italic;">M & M Stone Co. v. Pennsylvania, 388 F. App'x
156, 162 (3d Cir. 2010)</span></a><span style="font-style: italic;"> ("In
reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">it is well-established that a court should
`consider only the allegations in the complaint, exhibits
attached to the complaint</span><span style="font-style: italic;">,
matters of public record, and documents that form the basis of a claim.'")
(citation omitted). Additionally, "a court may
[also] consider an </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">undisputedly authentic document</span><span style="font-style: italic;">
that a defendant attaches as an exhibit to a motion to dismiss if the
plaintiff's claims are based on the document." </span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8320258775013695978&q=failed+to+consider+exhibits+attached+to+complaint&hl=en&as_sdt=3,31&as_ylo=2010"><span style="font-style: italic;">Pension Ben. Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. Indus.,
Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993)</span></a><span style="font-style: italic;">.</span>"</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
So if any one out
there knows Judge Noel L. Hillman, maybe you can ask him why the double
standard, and then you can come back and tell us what is going on. Till then I say he in on that (JSHIT) and if
you look above I have set in bold "undisputedly authentic document,"
which we will discuss tomorrow. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7J4MoTwnnn9xUTcTHwveguAKA-8uYGQnGaQK55BA9TtUHY5ATNSj4jY0cAM6wSsDlNBN7oOFaoudUmhgfy6U82NVgbrGod7QGcbopSH7Uet06Y7PTBi_0Av5_QEDODTZcpnPl4UlbCNI/s1600/MC900070935.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7J4MoTwnnn9xUTcTHwveguAKA-8uYGQnGaQK55BA9TtUHY5ATNSj4jY0cAM6wSsDlNBN7oOFaoudUmhgfy6U82NVgbrGod7QGcbopSH7Uet06Y7PTBi_0Av5_QEDODTZcpnPl4UlbCNI/s1600/MC900070935.jpg" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">You too are an agent
of change. Your support and views of
this blog will help to eliminate this injustice and make our judicial officers
think twice before practicing Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT).</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You, and I
appreciate it each time you tell a friend or two to join in the fight. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Agent, Gaming
Oracle, Over and Out!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-65380729041316454552012-03-09T05:33:00.000-08:002012-03-09T05:33:01.493-08:00Animosity Against Pro Se Litigants<br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Why Judge Has to Lie
to Cover Lies!</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5KS4U2m5YqNCeLaj5i-Cq1QJG4rzEZ_MIVtL-NUcM19PHHPDauA_LpCJ8okG64t7LrYWstIgZB51THsDveN9bVY4BIvp6s00I0Ihx2beNw-lPLhhqTqZFPFucnNGa_nDCLXoWS0dZTR0/s1600/MP900437378.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="137" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5KS4U2m5YqNCeLaj5i-Cq1QJG4rzEZ_MIVtL-NUcM19PHHPDauA_LpCJ8okG64t7LrYWstIgZB51THsDveN9bVY4BIvp6s00I0Ihx2beNw-lPLhhqTqZFPFucnNGa_nDCLXoWS0dZTR0/s200/MP900437378.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">This post may open
the eyes of many pro se litigants.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">When
these floodgates open there may be a need to review many so-called judicial
decisions.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I say "so-called"
because when I see the word judicial involved I wand to think of honor and
justice, but when a judge has to lie to cover for the "appearance of
justice" he is setting forth, and that appearance of justice is the actual
lie causing the second lie, justice has not be done.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
America, and the
world at large, let it be known that the American Judicial System is
perpetuating the above lie by selling the citizens of the United States of
America on acceptance of the appearance of justice. I believe this to be a
fact, and you all know what I always say by now, you must have a basis in fact
and law.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdRiP2MXtyirc12ES9sGNWQW3GjTtDX3A4_YsPuXPTBTbG9mlUtFQv7e-dLfLuQsiZ3pmia4NTtlfjTlbnbkvi-28yvW76ZJkRJqsGInqT-lrdtMpBCbW3XLgLD7_jW23iHIEVdyLpVG8/s1600/MP900289007.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdRiP2MXtyirc12ES9sGNWQW3GjTtDX3A4_YsPuXPTBTbG9mlUtFQv7e-dLfLuQsiZ3pmia4NTtlfjTlbnbkvi-28yvW76ZJkRJqsGInqT-lrdtMpBCbW3XLgLD7_jW23iHIEVdyLpVG8/s200/MP900289007.JPG" width="131" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Funny, but in doing
my research to substantiate the above position, I was able to find a Supreme
Court decision that hit the nail on the head. This case that I will reveal to
you squarely talks about my exact situation with Judge Noel L. Hillman and it further
preaches the acceptance of, or should I say, the satisfaction with just the
appearance of justice.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The case I'm
referring to is </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">Offutt
v. United States, 348 US 11</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> - </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15348771758421925949&q=appearance+of+justice&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">Supreme Court 1954</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,
page 14 holds:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">"Of course </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">personal attacks or innuendos by a lawyer against a
judge</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, with a view to provoking him,
only aggravate what may be an obstruction to the trial. The vital point is that
in </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">sitting in
judgment on such a misbehaving lawyer the judge should not himself give vent to
personal spleen or respond to a personal grievance</span><span style="font-style: italic;">. These are subtle matters, for </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">they concern the
ingredients of what constitutes justice</span><span style="font-style: italic;">.
Therefore, </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">justice must
satisfy the appearance of justice</span><span style="font-style: italic;">."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
I don't buy it, you
shouldn't buy it. This was not just something that was peddled in 1954, no it
continued forth. (See <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=appearance+of+justice&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2%2C31">"Google Scholar search"appearance of justice"</a> results 1-10, wherein the above case
is first, followed by nine others, with only one not containing the bold type
phrase above "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.") The first page of the search gives results
from 1954 through 1994, and if one restricted the search to cases from 2010,
they would find the citing of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth
Circuit, which holds: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Earp
v. Cullen, 623 F. 3d 1065, </span><span style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2744524576737285063&q=appearance+of+justice&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31&as_ylo=2010">1071-72</a></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">"In his opening brief, Earp requested that, upon
remand, we reassign the case to a different judge. In </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">the absence of personal
bias</span><span style="font-style: italic;">, we assign a case to a new judge on
remand only in "unusual circumstances." United States v. Sears,
Roebuck & Co., Inc., 785 F.2d 777, 780 (9th Cir.1986). To make a
determination that unusual circumstances exist, we consider whether: (1) "the
original judge would reasonably be expected upon remand </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">to have substantial
difficulty in putting out of his or her mind previously-expressed views or
findings determined to be erroneous or based on evidence that must be
rejected"</span><span style="font-style: italic;">; (2) "</span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline;">reassignment is advisable
to preserve the appearance of justice</span><span style="font-style: italic;">";
and (3) "reassignment would entail waste and duplication out of proportion
to any gain in preserving *1072 the appearance of fairness." Id. (quoting
United States v. Arnett, 628 F.2d 1162, 1165 (9th Cir.1979))."</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDKJZhMm-CUvjMzz4w4M3i6RDYsfXCZziCNAo6pDk1MWykNpxDfKS8-8Jg1gr4jBv0mfWPNGZ-eW0KzOD7kWIMW_9yoxXSq4_4oYEDuhJnY6eWZjZPJhpI6tdP_OUc0i83gGKZwUoUm-4/s1600/MP900289276.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="155" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDKJZhMm-CUvjMzz4w4M3i6RDYsfXCZziCNAo6pDk1MWykNpxDfKS8-8Jg1gr4jBv0mfWPNGZ-eW0KzOD7kWIMW_9yoxXSq4_4oYEDuhJnY6eWZjZPJhpI6tdP_OUc0i83gGKZwUoUm-4/s200/MP900289276.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">By now I am loosing
the laymen out there am I not?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Said
laypersons are saying: "and what has all of the above have to do with the
price of tea in China?"</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Please give
me a minute and I'll bring this all together, but first I must make sure that
at least all of my "rocket scientist" that minored in law are with
me. They should see the correlation just from the underlining in the cases
cited above. But...Just in case no one gets it I'll explain, because the
layperson's are right, because the above has nothing to do with the price of
tea in China. This is all about the sweeping of "JSHIT" under a
judicial rug, and the animosity against pro se litigants.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
With your
permission, (your continued reading that is) I'd like to get this in within
this one posting, so I may push the limits a bit, and be just a little
long-winded. [We still Cool?]</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
If a lawyer were to
have the courage to attack a judge, the courts say that this just may present
an obstruction during a trial. [Look 5 ¶'s above, the Supreme Court said this:
"<span style="font-style: italic;">Of course personal attacks or innuendos
by a lawyer against a judge, with a view to provoking him, only aggravate what
may be an obstruction to the trial.</span>"] Some may be sick of my past postings and
tweets, and some may be under the false impression that I am trying to provoke
judge Noel L. Hillman. NOT! A
commentator on the documentary "Eyes on the Prize" said that
"snakes don't kill themselves."
Guess what this gentleman was talking about the courts. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUpo54hzFpPxIwA3rhdmXJgcHW7iFOlcaADbCwB9meR4O78UTyDHSkyNHMciLLnA2XCHY5itwuxRYBRPydBrbvoO3x4GdqA5cTc5A0AC2C2qo2MCgINBjE9kUXEM9SGELo8L8I2y6u4BU/s1600/MC900440502.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUpo54hzFpPxIwA3rhdmXJgcHW7iFOlcaADbCwB9meR4O78UTyDHSkyNHMciLLnA2XCHY5itwuxRYBRPydBrbvoO3x4GdqA5cTc5A0AC2C2qo2MCgINBjE9kUXEM9SGELo8L8I2y6u4BU/s200/MC900440502.jpg" width="151" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I agree with the
commentator above, but my Brooklyn, NY upbringing has taught me that punks
won't fight, and further experience suggests that those that perpetuate and
started the use of "race" tend not to admit when they are wrong, and
they further try to indoctrinate those they feel inferior into a mentality of
admitting guilt even though innocent. [We all no the situation I am referring
to, just go to any U.S. Courthouse and you'll see it, a judge, a prosecutor, a
public pretender, an African-American, and its time to play "Lets Make a
Deal."]</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Let that same
African-American, or any other citizen, or person within that courts
jurisdiction request that they be granted pro se status. They state their
qualifications, knowledge and experience supporting, or should I say denying
the judges attempts at proving inability to do the same (represent one-self
that is). All hell breaks loose, the air gets thick enough to cut with a
knife. That’s JSHIT filling the room
folks, because the judge, prosecutor, and the public pretender already know the
bullshit going on. Now they have to find
out how much this guy knows, and I'm not talking about the facts of the case
folks. The facts of the case give those
representing him of her self the greatest advantage. The court knows that, so
they have to find out does this guy know that.
Then they have to (the court) get the answer to the all important
question, how much law does this guy know, and can we train his ass otherwise
because we tend not to know the shit (the law) ourselves, so we practice JSHIT.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The next question
the court has to answer is, how much courage does this person have? The best way to find that out is to offer
them door #1. Calm down, its not the big
deal, but the sweet deal. This is a like
a first date, the court can't go kissing-up on this person this early, plus if
they give away too much in open court they appear to be kissing this persons
ass.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Well if pro se
contestant passes up on door #1, gives judge Bob back all the dollars to buy
the car, and states that they want justice instead, then what? Well for one
some one has to clean up the donkey shit left behind door #2 that they had
waiting for that ass. [The ass left the shit folks, some may not know that a
donkey was a usual "zonk" prize on Lets Make A Deal.]</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPfKcp6XU4huY0dO0k6RM6uIUw0BF4PmvtTviaPfIKJDoX9JZkUSYslk1ANqmRR2_HTm2qNNu29dTOX8X3A6MYhXaV3-RcZzW36lHZu6U49RWy4V39LyMiKRVwyzDTbip8QcO8sfeC8ow/s1600/MC900230731.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="166" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPfKcp6XU4huY0dO0k6RM6uIUw0BF4PmvtTviaPfIKJDoX9JZkUSYslk1ANqmRR2_HTm2qNNu29dTOX8X3A6MYhXaV3-RcZzW36lHZu6U49RWy4V39LyMiKRVwyzDTbip8QcO8sfeC8ow/s320/MC900230731.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now our pro se
litigant must do the same as a contestant on the Price is Right.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes the show changes, why?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well for one this person turned down the
sweet deal and now to get a prize his or her ass has to perform for the
audience, jump through some hoops, and or learn how the game is played.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Starting to see the animosity growing?</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
That's right see, if
a person can present the facts of a case and stand on the law as well they
might just win. But if they win no
so-called judicial officer not working for the "State" gets a
paycheck. The public pretender doesn't
get to show the good ole boy's that he's willing to play along with the system,
whereby he's not concerned with his client, no this poor sap's not paying the
public pretender the "State" is.
If he, the PP wants to move up he has to play the game so he has no
concern with his so-called clients [FN] Civil and Constitutional Rights, he
needs to move up to fatten that paycheck.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Now just imagine
what happens if all of the above is documented and some pro se litigant catches
all of the above in their lies, tags and reveals what JSHIT is, and tell the
public and the world at large. Well folks you should have been able to guess it
by now, you don't have to imagine a thing. You're witnessing it folks, you've
read it throughout the postings of this blog. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The above tells you
how the judicial officers come to be so full of hubris, yet many lack courage,
and would rather yield to peer pressure and a paycheck than uphold their oath
to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and see that all a
treated equally and receive equal protection of the laws and have meaningful
access to the court. A lawyer is a
persons first line of meaningful access to the court, especially if he or she
is not trained in, or understands the law.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7Xcgklb56-pmjhRq9q5n-tEozb7DiaS_RO-fKfH2NR7zJtd0yGcCE8Aki2fSi56scHbbH8vF-Ie6JGKNu9-rUYJY2JCDMYliumnwPB-cK3xi8QYtryzdViEZ6IEyuehTAQ5O9uPo54OA/s1600/MM900283996.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7Xcgklb56-pmjhRq9q5n-tEozb7DiaS_RO-fKfH2NR7zJtd0yGcCE8Aki2fSi56scHbbH8vF-Ie6JGKNu9-rUYJY2JCDMYliumnwPB-cK3xi8QYtryzdViEZ6IEyuehTAQ5O9uPo54OA/s1600/MM900283996.GIF" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now that I have
uncovered and exposed Judge Noel L. Hillman, Magistrate Judge Karen M.
Williams, Christopher C. Mauro, Esq., DAG for the State of NJ Kathleen Bartus,
and their host of cohorts, who's mad?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Who do you think is really not pleased?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What's so fucked up is the law says that I'm right. That's why I'm
standing on it, at some point, and or some level of the judicial system or in
the court of public opinion these criminals will have to be convicted.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6I6qwaiDVL9FXgy-dgtZARoc1NbvUTqZ31K6d-5VkATTEhPmfRV3zeu6w9jj62YgTLlvxiUWNM9K3si7ITtwLtq8r-1EVJATxlA4SjR5J2xMN9TVO_reUGf9tqGcTjT00KfqxLGlx-Qw/s1600/MC900332982.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="196" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6I6qwaiDVL9FXgy-dgtZARoc1NbvUTqZ31K6d-5VkATTEhPmfRV3zeu6w9jj62YgTLlvxiUWNM9K3si7ITtwLtq8r-1EVJATxlA4SjR5J2xMN9TVO_reUGf9tqGcTjT00KfqxLGlx-Qw/s200/MC900332982.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Upon the conviction
of the above individuals I pray that they harbor no animosity against me, but
seek atonement for their sins, repent and move on with their live, God knows
that what I plan to do with mine.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You for your
time and God bless, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-24736191089346715462012-03-08T02:11:00.000-08:002012-03-08T02:11:52.639-08:00Judge Lies to Cover Lies, (JSHIT #8)<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEP9F0igH6_LHNXnqF0iyazP2DqXPyvATZ7gv6hBcenUu_nt9toBjXPPBGo-uS6xctbaZqZei7SCPDjjFvTydlCHn3QVcNLO1Nu1lSeQX8tTnAxCaGQ-NvF8deXWpbSBr5CtGSqBsd5KU/s1600/MP900443450.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEP9F0igH6_LHNXnqF0iyazP2DqXPyvATZ7gv6hBcenUu_nt9toBjXPPBGo-uS6xctbaZqZei7SCPDjjFvTydlCHn3QVcNLO1Nu1lSeQX8tTnAxCaGQ-NvF8deXWpbSBr5CtGSqBsd5KU/s200/MP900443450.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Please don't
pre-judge me to be disrespectful when I say that a judge lies to cover lies,
but I have to call it as I see it.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Pro
se litigants face enough prejudice in courts due to their pro se
"status," so please allow me to continue giving you the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, and then you can judge for yourselves.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Previously within
"<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/jshit-8-have-judge-that-will-lie.html">JSHIT #8, Have Judge That Will Lie!</a></span>"
I gave you the facts and showed you the documents relating to the filing of the
"Third Amended Complaint" in civil action 08cv02407. You were also given the Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure that stated when and how a paper is filed with the court. So, based on the facts and the law, was the
"Third Amended Complaint" filed on 8/18/2009? </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Yes, as you saw when
you clicked the link this document was stamped filed by the clerk of the court
on 8/18/2009 as <span style="color: red;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1nZXLmzKrmnOFB4R250WEFRUC1ka0xEMWpiTWlTZw">document [32]</a></span>, which is further
reflected by the courts docket sheet showing the same. But now we must remember that we have a judge
that knows he cannot make a ruling on a document that is supported by
documentary proofs attached as exhibits, so a plan had to be devised to correct
his understudy's mistake in following the rules correctly. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4JvyAKl77uAwIxlQNWuBRdg4eF32r2DZK_S1pZgu_Bgbe2pArIFIeAEKVFGlZ8NwB_expPMTBVzFWsaQRRytibAF9QQY9-UnF8TYdmQU15kVuK3821nE0BBXx9e8Xc1rG19CO74zq1Ao/s1600/MC900084230.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4JvyAKl77uAwIxlQNWuBRdg4eF32r2DZK_S1pZgu_Bgbe2pArIFIeAEKVFGlZ8NwB_expPMTBVzFWsaQRRytibAF9QQY9-UnF8TYdmQU15kVuK3821nE0BBXx9e8Xc1rG19CO74zq1Ao/s200/MC900084230.jpg" width="170" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Again, knowing that
the complaint was supported by strong proofs, Judge Noel L. Hillman and his
band of cohorts took from 8/18/2009 through 11/02/2009 to devise their
plan.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">After coming up with this plan
Judge Karen Williams was called upon to issue an Order stating that I had 20
days to re-file a document that was already filed on 8/18/2009.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[See </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o9n1ozrMbmum0dmrn-CzhpZ_-G85HXXBbtYSkKLOg_o/edit">Order granting32 Motion</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> on the docket sheet by scrolling to page 11.]</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Since I smell some
"JSHIT," let's see what the law has to say on the matter, because
it's obvious that we have to take it further than FRCVP 5, when dealing with
this band of wrongdoers. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dean v. Veterans Admin. Regional Office, <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6621368825402640059&q=deemed+filed+when&hl=en&as_sdt=3,31&as_ylo=2010">943F. 2d 667</a>, 671</span> says:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">See also Rodgers v. Bowen, 790 F.2d 1550, 1552 (11th
Cir.1986) ("[</span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">A] complaint is `filed'</span><span style="font-style: italic;"> for statute of limitations purposes </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">when it is
`in the actual or constructive possession of the clerk</span><span style="font-style: italic;">,' regardless of the untimely payment of the required
filing fee.") (citations omitted); Robinson v. City of Fairfield, 750 F.2d
1507, 1511 (11th Cir.1985) (the filing of legal and factual nature of claim
along with application for appointment of counsel and for authority to commence
action without prepayment of costs constitutes the filing of a complaint).</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeKyQG6NCte43iPKnMLxMnvSqeskkDCcNg_6i4q4TCT6fUMPWl_guVIs2krM9Mn1iolfaRQwevFAj_54jstnxqs7-vPVxrNPIKmP6YWS1LhUEU7irc4D_fwbKh1K62knrAMdt8wCAJIlc/s1600/MP900422582.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeKyQG6NCte43iPKnMLxMnvSqeskkDCcNg_6i4q4TCT6fUMPWl_guVIs2krM9Mn1iolfaRQwevFAj_54jstnxqs7-vPVxrNPIKmP6YWS1LhUEU7irc4D_fwbKh1K62knrAMdt8wCAJIlc/s200/MP900422582.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">These judicial
officers must be "smoking the good shit," they have to be high on
something if the docket shows the complaint in the possession of the clerk, the
document itself clearly says as seen on the </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1nZXLmzKrmnOFB4R250WEFRUC1ka0xEMWpiTWlTZw">Notice of Motion</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">: "Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 32 Filed 08/18/09 page
1 of 7 Page ID: 519."</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">Go ahead check it</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">, I'll wait...one thousand
one...one thousand two…</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Okay, you're
back. Please excuse me but after seeing
that you'll understand why I am upset.
How can lying ass Judge Noel L. Hillman have the hubris to write
sentence number four, stating:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Sentence #4</span>- <span style="font-style: italic;">That
same month, he filed his Motion for Summary Judgment.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
America, lets him
write this "JSHIT" other lawyers and judges accept this
"JSHIT," and start citing the "JSHIT," and the next thing
you know we have <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/02/bad-law-law-bad-yet-they-follow.html">bad judge made law</a></span>. As a pro se litigant I am held to the same
rules of court and rules of professional conduct. Let me boldly state that I hereby proclaim
"NOT ON MY [FN] WATCH!"</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi37vYtdfWihrGma-6-Wzm60v26TBzNdprEoAUSalWH3T2LNW6GC3TmQed9dyQHXfozZjMVbxOC8nbvdle-aIf30R3aGWgaY6Ux9F-lYvnhc5S9h3moTUn5bQJXs6cVSABsyigKwduIo1Q/s1600/MP900314249.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi37vYtdfWihrGma-6-Wzm60v26TBzNdprEoAUSalWH3T2LNW6GC3TmQed9dyQHXfozZjMVbxOC8nbvdle-aIf30R3aGWgaY6Ux9F-lYvnhc5S9h3moTUn5bQJXs6cVSABsyigKwduIo1Q/s200/MP900314249.JPG" width="148" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Of course he has to
state sentence four as he does, this liar knew they were going to put on their
"Broadway level" performance of Dec. 14, 2009, wherein "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/proselytization-of-kmw.html">Ms. Proselytization</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">" would attempt to
indoctrinate me into this school of thought. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">NOT! </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Later on I will show you how DAG for
the State of New Jersey, Kathleen Bartus did submit the documents they would
use to over expose and remove 8 pages from my complaint.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Folks federal statutory law calls that tampering
with, destruction, and mutilation of documents filed within a Court of the
United States of America.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Any wonder why as
you read this on 3/8/2012, lying ass Hillman's ruling on the motion to recuse
himself from civil action 08-cv-02407 and 11-cv-06304 is 16 days past due from
the 2/21/2012 hearing date. The "JSHIT" stinks something awful, and someone
needs to get off the "judicial pot."</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
See, on Dec. 14,
2009, before court commenced I filed the <a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1nZXLmzKrmnUkVQSWt1djhUYktPbDFQNDkyeTRfZw">Motion for Summary Judgment </a>at 10:41 AM. You
can see at the link that the clerk of the court stamped it "Received 10:41
AM," and then it was stamped within the system: "<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document
39 Filed 12/14/09</span>." Bad news
is, further research has shown me that this practice of "twice
filing" might just be worthy of another form of "JSHIT." You check it out, go to google scholar, in
the search box, type "filed twice," and watch the page results fill
to the max, Hmm???</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglWivz5b9HMEZKZ7qkv0f8m7TZZAqumY_htqAlSaZmY7us9HbNQpADiWxWjfvBuSyHZJV_gh9zKsmWho8Tsl05uhx4bZ5ESWv-x2bYSwEHoosDCIcQWuHKW1U1QvN5yC0-BPAhuKyhcAA/s1600/MP900321193.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglWivz5b9HMEZKZ7qkv0f8m7TZZAqumY_htqAlSaZmY7us9HbNQpADiWxWjfvBuSyHZJV_gh9zKsmWho8Tsl05uhx4bZ5ESWv-x2bYSwEHoosDCIcQWuHKW1U1QvN5yC0-BPAhuKyhcAA/s200/MP900321193.JPG" width="142" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'll close here, but
thanks for coming back each day.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Oh
before I forget, I got to thinking, what about all those with everyday
questions on the law?</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well I've created
a page on Facebook that all can join to ask, discuss, and share their
experiences with the law.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You can make
posts and all sort's of things, many will probably know how to use this page
better than I do, but my pledge will be to get the best answers and keep the
conversations going. I will just ask that it stays law related, so please tell
as many friends as you can and lets all be friends at </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><b><a href="http://www.facebook.com/1lolLaymenOnLaw">1lol-LaymenOnLaw</a></b></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
at </span><a href="http://www.facebook.com/1lolLaymenOnLaw" style="font-size: 11pt;">http://www.facebook.com/1lolLaymenOnLaw</a><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I figured others might enjoy saying
"this one layman on the law says, or has found."</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Again, this community page is open to all
laypersons, lawyers, and all in between. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">See you
there!</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-57606199372119542722012-03-07T02:33:00.000-08:002012-03-07T02:33:49.760-08:00JSHIT #8, Have Judge That Will Lie!<br />
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Cebull #1, Hillman
#195 (Bush Appointments), part: 3</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh20zWI7S1Vp4swOTTdyI9fbTZMUrKyOM94Lf20rJwlQl4xswNQ9yn0ZgZLfid9EWU2W-GjEyE_Ikf4Nv0qDQ63MxbvgGUDKpaDKd-mt0Swj61bLpnGhyphenhyphenCfLMb7_7WTv_y36l8AvlRZeoY/s1600/MC900059137.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh20zWI7S1Vp4swOTTdyI9fbTZMUrKyOM94Lf20rJwlQl4xswNQ9yn0ZgZLfid9EWU2W-GjEyE_Ikf4Nv0qDQ63MxbvgGUDKpaDKd-mt0Swj61bLpnGhyphenhyphenCfLMb7_7WTv_y36l8AvlRZeoY/s200/MC900059137.jpg" width="176" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Folks, candor
towards this tribunal has gone out the window.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I tried, but I can no longer have any respect for Judge Noel L. Hillman
and his (JSHIT) understudy Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">These judges are outright liars, and I will
show you why I use such strong words. [Those just joining us may need to refer
to "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/02/candor-towards-tribunal-is-hard-but-im.html">Candor Towards the Tribunal is Hard, But I'm Trying</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">," to understand why I am so blunt at this point.]</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Yes this posting
will also introduce you to "JSHIT #8," which is having a judge that
will outright lie for the party he is partial towards. But, we will also be continuing with the
"Cebull #1, Hillman #195 (Bush Appointments) series, and even though I am
compelled to title this posting as you see above let's say that it is code
named "Cebull #1, Hillman #195 (Bush Appointments), part: 3."</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Here within I will
continue to show you the lies and evasive statements of Judge Noel L. Hillman,
as written within his own opinion of September 27, 2010, in civil action
08-cv-02407. In "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/cebull-1-hillman-195-bush-appointments_06.html">Cebull #1, Hillman #195...part:2</a></span>" I set forth two
paragraphs from Hillman's opinion. Here
we will be discussing the six sentenced first paragraph, and you will be shown
that this man has managed to only tell the whole truth within the first sentence
of the paragraph. The next sentences
are:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Sentence #2-</span>
<span style="font-style: italic;">Subsequently, he amended his complaint
multiple times. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Sentence #3- </span><span style="font-style: italic;">Hickson finally filed his third amended
complaint in December 2009.</span> </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
I will take these
two sentences, and discuss them together, because combined they reveal the
intended stealth of Judge Hillmans choice of words. I'm referring to the use of
"multiple times" within the second sentence as apposed to just say
that I amended the complaint three times, or not using the second sentence at
all. But this judge say's this to invoke
prejudice from those that would read this opinion, especially those within the
"good ole boy's and girls network."
[Can't you just hear them gritting their teeth, and hammering their
fist, while saying "damn pro se plaintiffs.]</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyxHWqKh_12cPnJ1GylAZjjSwc1kuAR3_GytkYQratwvYczpxPT6xqLbMjRSTQLQQcT7Fw2rAZTmWcs3fyU47sU9jA5_Pi4zetttENimv2jzW4Erv_FgRhR0fQ0XleGnNdLwC_9KVz57E/s1600/MC900056210.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="183" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyxHWqKh_12cPnJ1GylAZjjSwc1kuAR3_GytkYQratwvYczpxPT6xqLbMjRSTQLQQcT7Fw2rAZTmWcs3fyU47sU9jA5_Pi4zetttENimv2jzW4Erv_FgRhR0fQ0XleGnNdLwC_9KVz57E/s200/MC900056210.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">That second sentence
also tends to infer that said amendments were done without leave of the court
when that is the farthest from the truth. The Courts docket sheet for 08cv02407
states: </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic;">11/02/2009, [35] Order granting 32
Motion to file Amended Complaint</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">. [See </span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o9n1ozrMbmum0dmrn-CzhpZ_-G85HXXBbtYSkKLOg_o/edit">Docket Sheet</a></span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> by clicking and scrolling to page 11]</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Please sit down for
this next bombshell of a lie, if your commuting to work have respect for those
around you, don't blurt out "OH JSHIT." This outright lie by a United States District
Judge may have that affect, so be warned. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
In the third
sentence Judge Noel L. Hillman says that I filed the third amended complaint in
December. Bold face lie folks as to cover their scheme, besides the docket
sheet doesn’t lie and it gives the specific date of the filing, but if you are
trying to detract from the fact that the federal rules of civil procedure
state:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
FRCVP
5 (d) (2) How Filing Is Made--In General. A paper is filed by delivering it:</div>
<ol style="direction: ltr; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.75in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="A">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;" value="1"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">To the clerk: or</span></li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">To a judge who agrees to
accept it for filing and who must then note the filing date on the paper
and promptly send it to the clerk.</span></li>
</ol>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .75in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
You lie and omit the
exact dates because you know that you have other plans for this "versatile
darkie." Yes, I went there. Cebull
say that our presidents mom said he is lucky he doesn't bark, so its safe to
assume that [FN] Bush appointee #195 wanted this "darkie" to jump
through some hoops, as shown by the events of December 14, 2009, with
proselytization candidate Karen M. Williams presiding. [Seeing that her and I
share the same skin tone Hillman may not consider her presiding, but
"Stepping and fetching"]</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Magistrate Judge
carried out the plan to the "T" folks, just take a look at "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/proselytization-of-kmw.html">Proselytization of KMW</a></span>," which details the
goings-on of 12/14/2009, and links you to documentary proofs as well. Pay close attention to the 6<span style="vertical-align: super;">th</span> paragraph and you will see that I mailed
the "Third Amended Complaint on 8/17/2009, "Ms. Proselytization"
received it on 8/18/2009, then-- I can only guess that she lost her [FN] mind
and followed FRCVP 5 (d) (2) (B) as evidenced by the "Clerks" stamp
on the damn document reading: " <span style="color: red;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=1dTsXDqHytIVmgTB6aM6fMuC-CE7QcXGyIo5Yo3L0Dkvlg3V8F5fO8pQjLLv_">Case1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW</a></span> Document
32-2 Filed 08/18/09." Also note
the big ass "Received 8/18/2009 Karen M. Williams." [Click link and
scroll to page 15. Please read all of this hand written letter to Ms.
Proselytization]</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDnmAV4fwKeJHNsFZOVUP2bdHFmE0qH7HaqxFWQyJOUL3-m5lCBi4t8j6lLrQ3tZobLglHYbRPHm_F4FNMHOjmTICGo_Pkkr0oLUUlqms-mn_RHkwK2BoCIU2hGSgcXIToZfbKB5uBYNc/s1600/MP900341391.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="142" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDnmAV4fwKeJHNsFZOVUP2bdHFmE0qH7HaqxFWQyJOUL3-m5lCBi4t8j6lLrQ3tZobLglHYbRPHm_F4FNMHOjmTICGo_Pkkr0oLUUlqms-mn_RHkwK2BoCIU2hGSgcXIToZfbKB5uBYNc/s200/MP900341391.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">I would not jump
through that hoop folk's.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The tape
recording of the proceedings of 12/14/2009 should reflect that</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I opened my New Jersey Rules of Court,
Federal, and read the rule to this woman.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Again, you may want to sit down, because you know what she had the
hubris to tell me; "You assumed I would grant you permission Mr.
Hickson."</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I wanted to tell her,
"I did not assume shit, on 7/01/2009 your ass told me I had to amend the
complaint, so that’s why I addressed the [FN] package to you, plus I know
you're sitting there lying because I have a PACER account, and it shows that
you was a good girl and filed it with the clerk, but now that pimp daddy is
mad-- you coming down on a brotha, and or at least trying to mama."</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0SQhht2dXiGclLClDO-QIURBFj0GBWvu3-Doorqw9UNcJCKSNEKtf5Mg3gMIJcnJMDVZ7VSuCeWMcRdpLoFRxdXGglq3KjBkoK3ITHanjEYnfcj5o5isSv-FzIG9EU6bxJeeWCkYB49U/s1600/MC900055019.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0SQhht2dXiGclLClDO-QIURBFj0GBWvu3-Doorqw9UNcJCKSNEKtf5Mg3gMIJcnJMDVZ7VSuCeWMcRdpLoFRxdXGglq3KjBkoK3ITHanjEYnfcj5o5isSv-FzIG9EU6bxJeeWCkYB49U/s200/MC900055019.jpg" width="191" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now at that time I
had [FN] candor for the tribunal, and I didn't say that to Judge Karen M.
Williams, but as you can see she steadily continued to try and grease may ass
up for "Mass-a Hillman."</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
follow the teaching of the Honorable Thurgood Marshall, and I know that the law
is a weapon, so that day I clenched by butt-cheeks, and used FRCVP 5</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">to prevent that judicial assault.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
As usual I'm going
to thank you oh so much for your time, ask that you tell a friend or two, but
also ask that those that can comment without consequences, to please do so
below.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387818425506754042.post-39346586015632009052012-03-06T01:19:00.000-08:002012-03-06T01:19:03.337-08:00Cebull #1, Hillman #195 (Bush Appointments) part: 2<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZfl5rfmSyI01zDVFoxSajt-OGN33J7DfvtOZXRv0_y4s29QqIR6VkfimssaFkSqA3RZphr8LfF6mM1hyphenhyphen5A6_RGyMrBMpkGPaTVz8wi_8kvEh8fN6chZQwIv4IKNiT2yKkwvwWSXqyxCI/s1600/MC910217263.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZfl5rfmSyI01zDVFoxSajt-OGN33J7DfvtOZXRv0_y4s29QqIR6VkfimssaFkSqA3RZphr8LfF6mM1hyphenhyphen5A6_RGyMrBMpkGPaTVz8wi_8kvEh8fN6chZQwIv4IKNiT2yKkwvwWSXqyxCI/s200/MC910217263.jpg" width="150" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Within "</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 11pt;"><span id="goog_271252732"></span><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/cebull-1-hillman-195-bush-appointments.html%20http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/03/cebull-1-hillman-195-bush-appointments.html">Cebull #1, Hillman #195</a> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">(Bush Appointments</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">)<a href="http://www.blogger.com/"><span id="goog_271252733"></span></a>" I
introduced you to the fact that former President George W. Bush's first
nomination to a United States District Court was Richard F. Cebull.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">By now we are familiar with what the recent
events have revealed about this first draft pick so to speak.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The headline above
also includes the former president's 195th appointment, Noel L. Hillman. Some will say that any further postings by me
on this judge would just be pouring salt on his open wounds. I beg to differ, for injustice is like a
wart, left untreated it hardens and grows. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Bush's first pick
was caught disseminating racially offensive emails to his, as I term "good
ole boy's and girl's network."
Bush's 195th pick is a little bit more sneaky and appears to be a bit
more sophisticated. In past postings I
have shared with you several instances of this judges "Judicial Stealthy
Hubristic Injustice Tactic's" <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/02/jshit-judicial-stealthy-hubristic.html">(JSHIT)</a></span>. For those just joining in, here are a few by
title:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="color: red; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2011/11/low-down-dirty-dirty-criminal-shame.html">Low Down, Dirty-Dirty, Even Criminal (Shame)</a></span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="color: red; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2011/12/got-proofs-need-judges.html">Got Proofs--Need Judges</a></span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="color: red; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/01/hickson-vs-hillmans-williams-jshit.html">Hickson vs. Hillman's & Williams' (JSHIT)</a></span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="direction: ltr; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: .375in; margin-top: 0in; unicode-bidi: embed;" type="disc">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0; vertical-align: middle;"><span style="color: red; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/02/aiding-and-abetting-from-bench.html">Aiding and Abetting From the Bench</a></span></li>
</ul>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
My main reason for
bring these two judges to your attention, is to show you how their hubris has
allowed them to become careless to the point of exposing themselves. The first pick never expected the joke, as he
now calls it, to be released to the public. Hmm? Maybe one of his own became
offended by this so called joke and spawned his exposure. Hmm?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXrq_VVUdpN6K19uZNnWS6Zabft_dbaifxKfMI1mcpPW-HFTVGiUUHtRuGVy8gn2_kvzl8TxIxMB6-lAv8lyZPQdVrq92CVSRiO25jUN-87X_G_2mrjTSseW1oxSsbBpnjHQA-fLZp0Vc/s1600/MC900424444.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXrq_VVUdpN6K19uZNnWS6Zabft_dbaifxKfMI1mcpPW-HFTVGiUUHtRuGVy8gn2_kvzl8TxIxMB6-lAv8lyZPQdVrq92CVSRiO25jUN-87X_G_2mrjTSseW1oxSsbBpnjHQA-fLZp0Vc/s200/MC900424444.jpg" width="162" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Be fore warned I
will get long-winded here, but please stay with me, and I will show you how
judicial corruption festers within the courts.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I say festers because, if you were to ask any lawyer, he or she would
confirm that this bunch take an oath to be self-governed by their own morals,
and the Rules of Professional Conduct. Trust me they don't tend to tell on each
other until one really pisses-off another one then (JSHIT) hits the fan and the
newspapers.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Judge Noel L.
Hillman, like any other lawyer, took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the
United States of America. President
George W. Bush nominated him to the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey. This man was not
nominated and seated on the bench to be New Jersey's Casino industry's
gatekeeper, and or insurance policy against liability under section 1983. But…</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
This man, Noel L.
Hillman restricts equal protection of the laws by becoming a treasonous
"liar" just as the "liars for hire" he conspires with, that
are hired by Harrah's Hotel and Casino Atlantic City. If you will indulge me and give me your time
I will show you by his own hand, as he wrote the opinion now before the public
and fronting as decisional law. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13405143048046505225&q=Hickson+v+Marina+Associates&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31">Hickson v Marina Associates, 743 F.Supp.2d 362 (2010)</a></span>
has been released for all to see. But
the lies and violations of the law are well hidden by this judge. Lets take a
look like we have not done in the past.
One clicking the link to this opinion will find that page 367 hold: </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">"In May 2008, Hickson filed his
original complaint in this Court. Subsequently, he amended his complaint
multiple times. Hickson finally filed his third amended complaint in
December 2009. That same month, he filed his Motion for Summary Judgment. In
March 2010, he submitted a "Renewed/Supplemental" Motion for Summary
Judgment. The Casino defendants and the State defendants cross-moved for
summary judgment in April 2010, respectively.</span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13405143048046505225&q=Hickson+v+Marina+Associates&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31#[4]"><span style="font-style: italic;">[4]</span></a><span style="font-style: italic;">"</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Note that the above
paragraph concludes with the reference to footnote [4]. I will show you what footnote [4] says here:</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 10.0pt; margin-left: .375in; margin: 0in;">
<a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13405143048046505225&q=Hickson+v+Marina+Associates&hl=en&as_sdt=2,31#r[4]"><span style="font-style: italic;">[4]</span></a><span style="font-style: italic;"> Most
recently, on August 25, 2010, Hickson filed a verified complaint and
"Order to Show Cause with Preliminary Injunction." The submission
appears to reiterate the allegations and arguments already propounded by
Hickson in his complaints, his "Brief in Support of Complaint,"
his motions for summary judgment, and his oppositions to defendants' motions.
It is worth noting, however, that the operative complaint in this case remains
Hickson's third amended complaint. Nevertheless, this latest submission
does not alter the Court's conclusions in this Opinion. The Court further
stresses that, even accepting Hickson's averments as if they were set
forth in an affidavit, only those facts to which Hickson has personal
knowledge may be considered as true. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e)(1)
("A supporting or opposing affidavit must be made on personal knowledge,
set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant is
competent to testify on the matters stated."); Mosley v. City of
Pittsburgh Pub. Sch. Dist., 2009 WL 2948519, at *1, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
81174, at *4 (W.D.Pa. Sept. 8, 2009) (explaining that "[s]tatements in
affidavits made only on belief or on information and belief may not be
considered in support of or in opposition to summary judgment" and that
"courts routinely grant motions to strike affidavits that are based upon
`belief' or `information and belief,' or which contain conclusory language,
vague assertions, gross speculation and inferences" (citation omitted)).</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Now, if you will
stay with me on this, and I hate to come across as if I'm begging you too, but
I promise that from the paragraph above, which ends with the reference to
footnote [4], I will show you what a liar this judge is and how he blatantly
ignores the Constitution, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The first lie to
show you is easy, because we have covered that issue in detail in a past
posting. That lie is in reference to the filing of the "Third Amended
Complaint" in civil action 08-cv-02407, which was filed on August 18,
2009. You can click this link to "<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://thecasinogamingoracle.blogspot.com/2012/02/aiding-and-abetting-from-bench-part-ii.html">Aiding and Abetting From the Bench (part II)</a></span>,"
and you will learn the details of the filing of this complaint. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
I've asked for a
lot, so I'll close this post and continue next time. If you are reading this post on 3/6/2012, be
further advised that Judge Noel L. Hillman's response to the motion to recuse
himself, that you will also see when you click the above link, is now 14 day's
over due. Please get all the facts, tell
a friend or two and join me right here later. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
Thank You, </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; margin: 0in;">
The Casino Gaming
Oracle!</div>Gaming Oraclehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477266350477160990noreply@blogger.com0