Pages

Sunday, December 11, 2011

A Gratia--Ex Gratia--Aah JSHIT

A gratia: from grace or favor: as a matter of indulgence, not of right. (Blacks Law Dictionary)  Ex gratia: as a favor: not compelled by legal right. (Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary)  Aah JSHIT: to exclaim in amazement, joy or surprise the JSHIT that’s really going down.  (Gaming Oracle definition 2011)

Judge Noel L. Hillman having taken an oath to uphold the integrity and independence of the court and the constitution of the United States of America, now either by a gratia, ex gratia, or just plain old Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics, has caused there to be a "Fraud Upon the Court."  Oop's my bad "Fraud by the Court"

In the third paragraph of  A3 Canon Firing Squad I briefly cited NJ Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 1.  For this post lets delve into this Canon a bit deeper, as we will want the full context and power of this canon when we fire it.   So let's begin to be on the "READY."

Canon 1.  A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary.  The canon further holds: "An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society.  A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing, and should personally observe, high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved.  The provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that objective."

Let us "take aim" through the cross-hairs of the facts.  But herein lies the problem, because Hillman has the power to use his position to conceal the facts from you. As far as I know, I do not share lineage with "Nostradamus", but I predict that the internet will be the downfall of many a resistant and hubristic judge.  Since time immemorial judges have lavished in their ability to write opinions suited to their needs.

They even have devices that are custom made for this practice, one is called the "unpublished opinion."   According to NJ Rule of Court 1:36-3 Unpublished Opinions, "No unpublished opinion shall constitute precedent or be binding upon any court. Except for appellate opinions not approved for publication that have been reported in an authorized administrative law reporter, and except to the extent required by res judicata, collateral estoppel, the single controversy doctrine or any other similar principle of law, no unpublished opinion shall be cited by any court.
JSHIT #5
Ok--Wait for it--Wait for it!   Judge Noel L. Hillman after reading the first complaint filed against Harrah's Hotel and Casino realized that they needed a favor so that they would not join the ranks of casinos' held liable for violating their patron's civil and constitutional rights. So what did he do, as I will set forth in more detail in a later posting, he did accept Harrah's Hotel and Casinos' attorney submission of a deposition that purports to be that of Sharon Fedaczynsky. (See [12]During her deposition, Fedaczynsky)

I am alleging that this deposition never took place.  The first reason being that it was supposedly taken in Hackensack New Jersey, in blatant violation of a stipulation that was entered and agreed to by myself, George Morton, and Harrah's Hotel and Casino's attorney Christopher C. Mauro.  This stipulation, which the tape recording of the 12/17/2008 proceedings will reflect, that the parties agreed that all depositions would be held at a conference room or some other office or space at Harrah's Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

The above stipulation was violated and to make a long story short here Judge Hillman's opinion of September 27, 2010 is anchored in this deposition, even though the caption page states that it is the subject of a matter before the "Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden" not the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Camden vicinage. (SEE Exhibit W attached to 2nd Complaint @ pg 155)

I say that a United States District judge accepting a bogus deposition, writing an opinion couched in said deposition, has indulged and or granted a favor to Harrah's Hotel and Casino by going along with the submissions of false testimony from a manufactured deposition.  Then when I sought to prove my point and filed a separate action wherein Christopher C. Mauro and Sharon Fedaczynsky would have to answer for themselves, again judge Noel L. Hillman steps in to run interference.

Judge Noel L. Hillman knowing that there was now a well pleaded 61 page complaint, supported by 174 pages of documentary exhibits, making the total complaint 235 pages in length pursuant to FRCVP 10 (c). (See Attached byLaw and Ignored by Will) Now in his latest attempt to clean up (JSHIT) or their shit, Hillman now says that a complaint wherein Sharon Fedaczynsky and Christopher C. Mauro would have to answer and tell the truth about this deposition.   Judge Noel L. Hillman posits that he is presiding over this matter and regardless of the fact that he is a material witness and named as a coconspirator  he is dismissing civil action 11-cv-06304. I say it appears we have J.S.H.I.T. #5, you be the judge.

Please, go back to the fourth paragraph above, read it, look at the documents then FIRE ONE!

Black History Month 2012 reigns in and all still do not have equal protection of the laws and meaningful access to the Courts of these United States of America.

1 comment: