A gratia: from grace
or favor: as a matter of indulgence, not of right. (Blacks Law Dictionary) Ex gratia: as a favor: not compelled by legal
right. (Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary) Aah JSHIT: to exclaim in amazement, joy or
surprise the JSHIT that’s really going down.
(Gaming Oracle definition 2011)
Judge Noel L.
Hillman having taken an oath to uphold the integrity and independence of the
court and the constitution of the United States of America, now either by a
gratia, ex gratia, or just plain old Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics, has
caused there to be a "Fraud Upon the Court." Oop's my bad "Fraud
by the Court"
In the third
paragraph of A3 Canon Firing Squad I briefly cited NJ Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon
1. For this post lets delve into this
Canon a bit deeper, as we will want the full context and power of this canon
when we fire it. So let's begin to be on
the "READY."
Canon 1. A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and
Independence of the Judiciary. The canon further holds: "An independent
and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing,
maintaining, and enforcing, and should personally observe, high standards of
conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be
preserved. The provisions of this Code
should be construed and applied to further that objective."
Let us "take
aim" through the cross-hairs of the facts. But herein lies the problem, because Hillman has the power to use his
position to conceal the facts from you. As far as I know, I do not share lineage
with "Nostradamus", but I predict that the internet will be the
downfall of many a resistant and hubristic judge. Since time immemorial judges
have lavished in their ability to write opinions suited to their needs.
They even have
devices that are custom made for this practice, one is called the
"unpublished opinion."
According to NJ Rule of Court 1:36-3 Unpublished Opinions, "No
unpublished opinion shall constitute precedent or be binding upon any court.
Except for appellate opinions not approved for publication that have been
reported in an authorized administrative law reporter, and except to the extent
required by res judicata, collateral estoppel, the single controversy doctrine
or any other similar principle of law, no unpublished opinion shall be cited by
any court.
JSHIT #5
Ok--Wait for
it--Wait for it! Judge Noel L. Hillman
after reading the first complaint filed against Harrah's Hotel and Casino
realized that they needed a favor so that they would not join the ranks of
casinos' held liable for violating their patron's civil and constitutional
rights. So what did he do, as I will set forth in more detail in a later
posting, he did accept Harrah's Hotel and Casinos' attorney submission of a
deposition that purports to be that of Sharon Fedaczynsky. (See [12]During her deposition, Fedaczynsky)
I am alleging that
this deposition never took place. The
first reason being that it was supposedly taken in Hackensack New Jersey, in
blatant violation of a stipulation that was entered and agreed to by myself,
George Morton, and Harrah's Hotel and Casino's attorney Christopher C.
Mauro. This stipulation, which the tape
recording of the 12/17/2008 proceedings will reflect, that the parties agreed
that all depositions would be held at a conference room or some other office or
space at Harrah's Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey.
The above
stipulation was violated and to make a long story short here Judge Hillman's
opinion of September 27, 2010 is anchored in this deposition, even though the
caption page states that it is the subject of a matter before the
"Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden" not the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey, Camden vicinage. (SEE Exhibit W attached to 2nd Complaint @ pg 155)
I say that a United
States District judge accepting a bogus deposition, writing an opinion couched
in said deposition, has indulged and or granted a favor to Harrah's Hotel and
Casino by going along with the submissions of false testimony from a manufactured
deposition. Then when I sought to prove
my point and filed a separate action wherein Christopher C. Mauro and Sharon
Fedaczynsky would have to answer for themselves, again judge Noel L. Hillman
steps in to run interference.
Judge Noel L.
Hillman knowing that there was now a well pleaded 61 page complaint, supported
by 174 pages of documentary exhibits, making the total complaint 235 pages in
length pursuant to FRCVP 10 (c). (See Attached byLaw and Ignored by Will) Now in his latest attempt to clean up (JSHIT)
or their shit, Hillman now says that a complaint wherein Sharon Fedaczynsky and
Christopher C. Mauro would have to answer and tell the truth about this
deposition. Judge Noel L. Hillman posits that he is presiding over this matter
and regardless of the fact that he is a material witness and named as a
coconspirator he is dismissing civil
action 11-cv-06304. I say it appears we have J.S.H.I.T. #5, you be the judge.
Please, go back to
the fourth paragraph above, read it, look at the documents then FIRE ONE!
Black History Month 2012 reigns in and all still do not have equal protection of the laws and meaningful access to the Courts of these United States of America.
Black History Month 2012 reigns in and all still do not have equal protection of the laws and meaningful access to the Courts of these United States of America.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete