Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Answers Disputing Allegations = Issues for Trial?

(Atlantic City, NJ)-  I filed a "Motion for Summary Judgment" and it was denied. Harrah's Hotel and Casino by way of its attorney filed a "Motion Summed-Up in Lies" and it was granted. Lets take a look at the facts. You can't run from the truth I was always told.
Previously we touched on the answers that were filed by the defendants within civil action 08cv02407 NLH-KMW, in the posting titled Answer Genesis/Revelations of theDefendants.  It is now time for a more detailed analysis of the answers and other documents purporting to support Harrah's Hotel and Casino, Atlantic City's a gratia summary judgment.  By going into the details one can see that Judge Noel L. Hillmans opinion of September 27, 2010 is based on lies and his willingness to be "willfully ignorant" to the truth's I will show you.
JSHIT #7 is revealed by Harrah's Hotel and Casinos attorney Christopher C. Mauro's, as the court would say, "misrepresentation," and here I say "straight-up lies," as here I am not subject to "candor towards the [FN] tribunal." OH YES, I'm pissed and God has told me I don't have to be cute, as I can boldly speak the truth, and so that more of you keep interest in the truth I will "kick-it" with flavor. (you feel me?)

Like Das EFX said on their album Straight Up Sewaside, Check it Out, "I'm in the house with the books, so yo take a look." FRCVP Rule 3 plainly say that: "A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court." Christopher C. Mauro attempts to distort the facts and have the record appear that my complaint was not timely and that I filed amendment to the complaint which would yield the complaint at issue the "Fourth Amended Complaint" which does not exist.

You be the judge here is a copy of his "Brief in Support of Vance Thompson,Anna Haag, and Marina Associates Motion for Summary Judgment." On page 2 Mauro says: "Plaintiff commenced suit against Harrah's Hotel and Casino on May 28, 2008. (Plaintiff's summons and complained annexed hereto as Exhibit "C").  (JSHIT) Check it out y-all!  FRCVP says what?  You can't put your (JSHIT) out there and then try to cure it by pointing to a fact that, yes a summons was issued on May 28, 2008, but the ultimate fact remains that the action commenced on May 15, 2008.  Petty you might say but do you homework on statute of limitations and you will see that the lawless-ones are setting up the record to appear clean when the (JSHIT) gets flushed. (to be continued…)

Black History Month 2012 reigns in and all still do not have equal protection of the laws and meaningful access to the Courts of these United States of America.

No comments:

Post a Comment