One on his or her
private one mile road, or should I say extended driveway, has no
reason to drive on either the right or the left side of this road. Why?
This person is under no legal or other convention requiring that they
drive on a particular side of their private road or extended driveway.
Upon coming to the
end of said driveway, and depending on the laws of the country or jurisdiction,
this same person now finds that upon entering a public roadway he or she must
now follow the convention set by the law as to which side of the road one must
drive.
So, why do we have
Rules of Court? It was my interpretation
that these rules determined how an action would proceed. After being the victim
of the Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactic presented in my last posting
it appears my faith in the holding of FRCVP 1 were misguided. FRCVP 1 Scope and
Purpose, holds: "These rules govern the procedure in all civil action and
proceedings in the United States district courts, except as stated in Rule 81. They should be construed and administered to
secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action and
proceeding."
Judge Hillman, his
understudy Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams, Harrah's Hotel and Casino,
Christopher Mauro, and DAG, Kathleen Bartus are hell-bent on circumventing this
rule of court. Their concerted actions
are designed to extend civil action 08cv02407 as long as possible. Hoping that I will acquiesce to their (J.S.H.I.T.),
or that the litigation will become to expensive for me to maintain or finally
that I'm hit by a bus or fall prey to some other accident and after I don't
respond they can sweep the case under some judicial rug.
I'm looking both
way's when I cross the street's now days. FRCVP 2 One Form of Action holds:
"There is one form of action--the civil action." Well I appear to
have met this standard as the court's records say civil action # 08cv02470, I
sort of get the impression that the cv between the "08" and
"02407" denote a civil action also.
What do you think?
Being further armed
with the rules above, I now ask that you dawn your "demolition
expert" suits and aide me in taking apart this time bomb, await to explode
and destroy our judicial system. You
will need some for of protection so to speak because in the forth coming
posting I will detail FRCVP 10 Form of Pleadings. More specifically FRCVP 10 ( c ) Adoption by
Reference, Exhibits, holding: " A statement in a pleading may be adopted
by reference elsewhere in the same pleading or in any other pleading or
motion. A copy of a written instrument
that is an exhibit to a pleading is a part of the pleading for all
purposes." This was the most important rule that I came to understand
before filing my complaint. God blessed me to understand that I had to attach
my documented proof's to the complaint and you'll start to see that I did.
Homework, Click
Hickson v. Marina Associates in the "Source Links" to the right, upon
Judge Hillmans Opinion of Sept. 27, 2010 appearing, search this document for
the word "exhibit." Attached
to the complaint pursuant to FRCVP 10 ( c ) are my exhibits "A"
through "Z" and the word "exhibit" is referenced or fifty
times in the complaint yet how can one reason that a United States District
Judge could write an Opinion wherein the word "exhibit" does not
appear once. (J.S.H.I.T.) I'm telling you, but will you stay tuned to stop it?
Well you have
homework and I can't wait all night for you to find "exhibit" as
assigned, so I'm going to bed. See you tomorrow. Happy and Knowledgeable Gaming!
TheCasinoGamingOracle
No comments:
Post a Comment