I could not forgo
the opportunity to bring to your attention what happens when a U.S. District
Judge meets his obligation to uphold the Constitution of the United States of
America.
I applaud U.S.
District Judge Jed Rakoff's setting a trial date in the case before him. One clicking the "Source Link" to
the right "Bloomberg.com" will find the article titled "Citi
Settlement With SEC Rejected by Judge."
I applaud Bloomberg. Com for brining this article to the public as it
outlines what a U.S. District Judge should do when he is not given sufficient
facts upon which he can make a ruling.
The article further
points out that Judge Jed Rakoff has criticized the SEC's practice of letting
big financial corporations settle without admitting or denying liability. Why,
do I applaud these actions you ask? First
and far-most, because they are just and in line with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Secondly, because I am
dealing with a judge of a different opinion.
This very posting
falls smack dab in the middle of my presentation of U.S. District Judge Noel L.
Hillman's action that are on the opposite end of what Judge Jed Rakoff has done
by his actions, that being following the Rules of Procedure. I invite all tuning
into this short posting to subscribe an keep abreast of what a U.S. District
Judge shouldn't do. I set forth my basis in fact and law just as I'm doing
here. Not only do I make the averment that I applaud the article but I'm giving
you a direct link to this article so that you may draw your own opinions.
The above is the
same method I am using in the presentation of Hickson v Marina Associates,
civil action 08cv02407(NLH) (KMW), being litigated within the U.S. District
Court for the District of New Jersey, Camden. Thank you for stopping by,
TheCasinoGamingOracle
No comments:
Post a Comment