If you do
not know what "Judicial Stealthy Hubristic Injustice Tactics (JSHIT)"
are, well welcome to "The Casino Gaming Oracle." You must be a "newbie." All those familiar with this blog know that
(JSHIT) is my acronym for the bullshit
judicial officers pull to effect injustice, especially when they are getting
their ass kick in court, or they are owed a favor by the judge for not
snitching on the judge or some other judicial officer, or "good ole boy's
and girl's" network member. (JSHIT defined,click here)
TRUE or FALSE?
Release
Notes |
District CM/ECF Release 4.1
| 12/2/2009 says:
A1 All PACER Users
A1.1 Searching by Page ID Number
A new sequential pagination feature was developed in CM/ECF
to provide a unique page ID number for
every page of each document in a case.
The page ID numbers are sequenced in the
order in which the documents are filed
in a case. If a user prints a set of documents, each page of the selected
documents will display the same unique page number each time it is printed or
viewed, provided the PDF Header feature is turned on.
Through this new sequential pagination feature, permanent
sequential page numbers are available,
so anyone accessing a document from the District court docket is assured
of always referencing the same page.
Those
within the legal profession know what the "PACER" and or
"CM/ECF" electronic court filing system is. For those outside this realm, it is the
system used to electronically file documents with a court of law.
The above
"Release Note" from "PACER" alerts all lawyers that as of
12/2/2009, this system was upgraded to add a unique "Page ID Number"
to each document one files within a court of law that has such a system in
place. The following is an example of a page file within the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey, the "Page ID Number"
is "809" as seen in the top right-hand corner of the page.
Please, reread the last sentence of the first paragraph,
stating: "provided the PDF Header feature is turned on." Lawyer, correct me if I'm wrong but all
document filed with courts having this system, have page ID numbers on all
document filed with that court after December 2, 2009, right?
The above example of [Document 40] filed on 12/ 15/09
confirms that "Page ID Numbers" are being assigned to documents filed
within the U.S. Dist. Court for the District of New Jersey.
My question is why would some judicial office, and I say
judicial office, because only judicial officers have access to the "pdf
Header Feature" button which is on the equipment at the "Clerk of the
Courts" office correct?
So, any document entered on a "PACER" system lacking a page ID number means that some judicial officer has turned off the "pdf header feature" correct. Once we can attribute to inadvertence, twice two lack of training, but three times has to be willful, and any thing more has to reflect some (JSHIT) going on.
So, here are a few more "pdf Headers" form actual document filed within civil action 08-cv-02407. Soon to be know or caption "In Re: the Matter of Noel L. Hillman's (JSHIT).
So, any document entered on a "PACER" system lacking a page ID number means that some judicial officer has turned off the "pdf header feature" correct. Once we can attribute to inadvertence, twice two lack of training, but three times has to be willful, and any thing more has to reflect some (JSHIT) going on.
So, here are a few more "pdf Headers" form actual document filed within civil action 08-cv-02407. Soon to be know or caption "In Re: the Matter of Noel L. Hillman's (JSHIT).
- 36 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 36 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 70 PageID: 603
- 37 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 37 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 2
- 38 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 38 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 1
- 39 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 39 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 133 PageID: 676
- 40 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 40 Filed 12/15/09 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 809
- 42 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 42 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 3
- 43 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 43 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 1
- 44 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 44 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 38
- 56 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 56 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 14
- 60 Case 1:08-cv-02407-NLH-KMW Document 60 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 5
Knowing
that birds of a feather, stick together, the ten examples above, span a six
month period, as to eliminate those that would say the practice hadn't set in
yet. I posit that if I can show that only 3 out of 10 filing in the above case
have "Page ID number," and all of the documents were filed after
12/2/09, someone has willfully tampered with the "pdf Header button."
TRUE OF FALSE? +1 this post for (True),
leave a comment and back it up if you think my inference is false and (JSHIT)
is not lurking in this instance.
Thank you
for viewing this blog, and please continue to share it with friends, the
support is oh so encouraging.
The Casino
Gaming Oracle!
P.S.
Don't forget +1 = True, Comment with all false answers and or responses.
Lawyers and those with PACER access, note that the docket number in the
examples above are linked, I lack the funds to pay my PACER bill so I can not
check the link, let me know if its not working, so I can remove, Thanks!